Category: Business

Source: Radio New Zealand

Chef and barista Sam Wilson hopes the re-opening of his cafe in a rustic railway station flanked by Mt Ruapehu is a pointer to something good for a region suffering economic hardship.

He lives at nearby Kakahi, far from his old life in the city.

Now he’s fuelling hikers day-to-day and creating a meeting point for people in the Central Plateau.

“There’s been a great deal of loss in the region, with the Chateau closing and with a lot of the businesses closing in what was National Park,” Wilson said.

“The failure of the skifield and the timber mills closing, and then having us opening is something really positive.

“A lot of people have a lifelong association with the railway station and a deep fondness for that building, and that’s why it’s been so well received.”

Wilson’s Station Cafe is up and running after a full refurbishment.

Within the last week, the government has announced it will invest $10.8 million in tourism around the mountain to help the district.

The completion of Ruapehu’s cycle trail network is one of the council’s major economic development goals.

The latest funding is for two sections of the Mountains to Sea trail from the Tūroa Ski Area to Whanganui.

Once completed, both the Te Ara Mangawhero trail and Te Hangāruru trail, to the Last Spike, will be linked to the Mountains to Sea ride.

The historic station, which dates to an era when engineers first linked Auckland and Wellington by train, sits exposed at 800 metres above sea level.

Located beside the National Park park and ride, the cafe is well placed for more than 100,000 hikers taking on the Tongariro Crossing each year.

With the cycleway developments, you’d expect more lycra-clad riders coming in.

“The crossing season started about a week ago, and we’ve started getting tired and exhausted looking… people in the afternoon, looking for a slice of cake and a coffee.”

Wilson was running the Milk and Honey cafe at Victoria University until he shifted north in the Covid lockdown.

He wasn’t put off by the gloomy local economy, when he decided to make a go of it.

Wanting to create something of quality for locals, he’s hit something of a sweet spot.

“People from places like Taumarunui, Ohakune, Tūrangi, people come from Taupo,” he said.

It’s not unusual to see gumboots by the door, as busy farmers drop in, or families holidaying in the area sit on the sofas and around the tables.

Re-elected Ruapehu Mayor Weston Kirton ticks the Taumarunui box as a resident there. He’s also a staunch supporter of heritage buildings.

“We were going down to an old school theatre down at Raetihi and we thought we’d have dinner at the Station,” Kirton said.

“We were delighted. National Park, Waimarino was developed around the railway of course.

“It’s got a lot of history and as the skifields developed, it made it more attractive to go there.”

The bigger prize for Kirton and many people around the country is to see the decaying Chateau Tongariro restored to its former glory.

Kirton’s campaign to save the Chateau has taken another step forward.

Once the jewel in the crown, the district council submitted its petition calling for urgent government action earlier this month.

“We need a clear government pathway to resolve any hurdles, so investors can get on with the job,” Kirton said.

On the southern side of the mountain in nearby Ohakune, Bayleys real estate agent Jenny Dekker has seen all the highs and lows of the ski town.

Values had now fallen so far, there’s renewed interest from buyers, she said.

“Prices have dropped $100,000, so new people can come into the market,” Dekker said.

“I’m not selling rumpty old houses to first-home buyers – they’re beautiful and warm, and you’d be proud to own them. They’re great for the family.”

Dekker said there was a glimpse of increased activity among first-time buyers and downsizers, with people moving in from other regions.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Got questions? RNZ has launcheda new podcast, No Stupid Questions, with Susan Edmunds.

We’d love to hear more of your questions about money and the economy. You can send through written questions, like these ones, but even better, you can drop us a voice memo to our email questions@rnz.co.nz.

You can also sign up to RNZ’s new money newsletter, Money with Susan Edmunds.

I have recently started investing more seriously and have heard many positive things about the S&P500. However, from my research, I understand that if I invest directly into this fund, I will be liable for FIF tax once my portfolio exceeds $50,000 in value.

It is possible to invest in the S&P500 from a NZ domiciled fund within a PIE structure, and these are advertised as ‘taking care of the tax for you’ and keeping your tax rate to 28 percent or less depending on your earnings bracket.

My question is, isn’t the fund manager of the NZ domiciled fund still required to pay FIF tax, and as any cost is generally split over all the investors, and the combined value of the fund is way over $50k, isn’t FIF already triggered? So even if you had just started investing and had less than $50k invested in the S&P500 through the NZ domiciled fund, you would still proportionally have FIF tax deducted?

If this is correct, shouldn’t this be more transparent by the fund managers, as investors I know think they’re avoiding FIF altogether by investing in this type of PIE NZ domiciled fund and the funds note tax is deducted on your behalf, but there is no mention of FIF tax?

You are right that if you put more than $50,000 into certain types of foreign investments, you will be captured under the Foreign Investment Funds (FIF) regime. Under that level, you only pay tax on the income received.

New Zealand funds that invest in international shares such as the S&P500 index fund are subject to the regime without the $50,000 cap.

PIE fund are required to calculate their FIF tax using the fair dividend rate (FDR) method which means they work out what investors have to pay with a calculation of the investor’s prescribed investor tax rate on 5 percent of the average daily portfolio value.

If you are earning a higher income, you might find that the 28 percent cap on the PIR rate is a benefit.

Dean Anderson, founder of Kernel, said one of the reason he launched the shares and ETFs feature was to help navigate this.

“For some tax optimising investors, they could reduce their total tax costs by purchasing an offshore ETF or shares to the combined value of say $49,000, and then investments above that they start direct to a PIE structured fund.

“One thing investors need to be conscious of, is some broking platforms have a ‘money market’ fund for their wallet. This means that an investor may intend to purchase just under $50,000 in an investment, but then when those investments start to pay out dividends and they land in the money market fund it gets captured and counts towards their FIF threshold and they can be triggered over $50,000 and now have to calculate FIF tax on their entire portfolio.”

He said whether there was more tax to pay overall by investing offshore would depend on the investment.

“It is possible to have lower tax by buying offshore investments directly for the first $50,000. However, if the dividend yield was high then that may not be the case. Investors also need to consider the other costs of investing – including brokerage fees, foreign exchange fees…”

My mum and the rest of my family and I (two adults, two teens) are about to move to a new house with two units, and I’m looking for advice on the simplest way to run our bills banking-wise. We both bank with the same bank, which helps a little.

My husband and I will be solely responsible for the mortgage and our power is split by unit, but other than that we will be splitting 80/20 for rates, piped gas, broadband, insurances (house, contents, two cars), food box subscriptions, takeaways, and groceries. We will continue to share our main family meal each evening.

The two unpredictable values (per month) are groceries and gas costs. But I don’t want either us or mum to need to be adjusting the amount to put into a shared account each month. We need to pay for the subscription box by debit card, and would like to also be able to access the debit card-linked account for our streaming accounts.

Do we make the account we get paid into the bills account too? And get everything going out of that, with mum just paying a set amount per month into it, setting aside our regular spending money into a different account? But how do we budget for gas? Is there any predictable value we can put on this, allowing for peaks in winter?

I took your question to David Verry, at North Harbour Budgeting Service.

He said, for the regular expenses, a good way to work it out would be to use history to guestimate what you might each have to pay under your new structure.

“Take the last six – or 12, even better – months and work out what each expense cost and then work that out on a monthly basis for the mother’s contribution.

“Some expenses may also be set for the next six or 12 months – rates, insurances, broadband, possibly even the foodboxes – so these can be calculated with some accuracy. It’s the grocery costs that tend to move around a bit but averaging them out usually works out pretty well.

“Vehicles can be a bit tricky depending on who is paying for what – mother may be running her own vehicle – WOFs, regos and insurance can be calculated reasonably accurately. Petrol can be worked out by keeping a mileage log – I recall having to use a logbook when I was using the family vehicle and living at home. Repairs and maintenance are the biggest unknowns – I generally default to $400-$500 per year for this per vehicle.”

He said you would probably need to repeat the exercise regularly to ensure your budget was working once you were in your new place.

As for the account structure, he said it would need to be worked out so that it suited everyone without too much transferring going on.

Verry said he would generally recommend three accounts for households.

One would be a general or everyday account into which income was paid and from which weekly and fortnightly expenses were paid.

A monthly account would cover monthly bills, and you would transfer a set amount in each time you were paid to build up a buffer to cover these.

Then an annual account could be used to build a fund to cover yearly expenses.

“The general/everyday account then becomes the wash-up account. So, if a household has a budget surplus, what’s left over in this account can go into an interest-bearing savings account. It can act as an emergency fund too.

“Account structure is very family-dependent and what works best. For instance, in our household we put as much as we can on credit card but ensure we have sufficient to pay the balance owing off every month.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

New Inland Revenue guidance suggesting hard hats could be a taxable work perk could confuse some employers, one tax expert says.

IRD has released an update on when fringe benefit tax (FBT) exemptions apply to employee benefits provided for health and safety reasons.

Robyn Walker, tax partner at Deloitte, said there had been some confusion about how wide that exemption would be.

Fringe benefit tax generally does not apply when the benefit being provided is related to an employee’s health and safety, aimed at managing health and safety risks, and would be excluded by an ‘on-premises exemption’ if it was provided at work.

Exemptions might apply to things like an ergonomic desk for someone working at home, or flu vaccinations.

Work clothing has a separate exemption, but only if it is “distinctive”, such as a uniform with an employer’s name on it.

Walker said IR had made it clear that it did not think protective clothing would always fit into that exemption.

In one example it gave, a road maintenance contracting business providing workers with hard hats, high-vis clothes, safety glasses and ear muffs would find they were not exempt from FBT.

Walker said it was unlikely anyone would think a hard hat required for work was an employee benefit.

She said FBT was probably not being paid on these at present.

But it seemed IRD had assumed they were a benefit, and then were working out whether an exemption would apply, rather than discussing whether there was a benefit in the first place, she said.

“It could potentially push people to just incur additional costs having to brand things in order to be absolutely clear that there is no FBT payable on something where FBT shouldn’t be payable to start with.”

IRD said it was also its view that there was a benefit to an employee when their employer paid their medical costs after a workplace accident.

Walker said that was strange.

“While good health is obviously viewed as a benefit to an individual, in the situation of an employer assisting to put right a workplace accident to reinstate an employee’s health, this does not seem like a scenario where FBT should be levied. Again, if it is concluded there is a benefit, a law change is warranted.

“If I chopped off my hand in some sort of terrible accounting photocopier accident I would expect that, if it’s due to a fault of the photocopier that I’ve lost my finger or whatever it is then the employer should be paying my medical cost to rectify that.

“Is there a benefit where your health has been negatively impacted by a workplace accident to restore your health? It’s hard to say there’s a benefit if I have my finger chopped off and have it put back on. I start with 10 fingers, I go down to nine and I end up with 10. I’m not actually better off in that scenario.

“FBT should apply when the employer is doing something for the employee which saves them from having to incur their own private expenditure on something. And so I would say I shouldn’t have to pay to get my finger attached because my fingers were all attached to start with and if I’m going to work on a construction site, I should be provided with everything that I required in order to go home at the end of the day without concussion, with all my fingers, my toes haven’t been sliced off.

“Working in a freezing works, I should be able to have some gloves provided and there shouldn’t be any tax on that. I’m not saving myself any private expenditure by having the employer provide what is required to do the job.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Callaghan Innovation’s shutdown has so far cost taxpayers more than $10 million in redundancy payouts for 209 roles lost, according to recently published documents.

The crown-owned science and innovation entity has been a casualty of the Government’s overhaul of the science sector, which has also seen the merging of Crown Research Institutes into Public Research Organisations and a newly established advanced technology institute.

While some functions of Callaghan Innovation were retained, other parts have been wound up over the past year, with all funding expected to end by mid-2027.

Documents released to the Public Service Association (PSA) under the Official Information Act (OIA) revealed Callaghan Innovation’s dissolution has cost $10.69m in redundancies since November 2023.

Callaghan Innovation has confirmed the numbers in the OIA, made public by the PSA on Friday, but offered no further comment.

The OIA documents showed 36 redundancies in the 2023/24 financial year cost $2.87m, the axing of 162 roles in 2024/2025 cost $5.72m and so far this year, $2.1m has been spent with the loss of 11 roles.

More payouts were expected, as roles continued to be disestablished into 2026.

They said the future impact and total cost of Callaghan’s closure was unknown, as “redundancies continue to be processed on a regular basis”.

The documents said Callaghan had spent $68,913 since October 2023 on external consultants advising on restructures – the figure also included other legal advisory services.

The OIA showed roles at Callaghan had dropped from 367 to 158 – a reduction of 57 percent – over two years, with more than 60 jobs axed in February, followed by a proposal to cut a further 67 in April.

PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the OIA had revealed the “staggering cost” of layoffs.

“This is an obscene waste of money from a government, which claims to want to spend taxpayer money wisely,” she said.

“More importantly, this is a critical loss of expert scientists and researchers, who had more to give New Zealand. It will set New Zealand back for years.”

According to the PSA, the 209 job cuts at Callaghan Innovation included the chief scientist, among 114 scientists and researchers, and contributed to the loss of 650 research roles in the public sector – a figure that the Science Minister’s office could not confirm.

Ben Wylie-van Eerd, a former Callaghan scientist and union delegate who was made redundant this year, said the country had lost talented scientists and engineers.

“Many of my colleagues have moved overseas, and have been snapped up quickly by organisations in Europe and Australia, where their skills are valued.

“Sadly, I don’t think they’ll be looking to come back any time soon.”

In response to the OIA, Science Minister Shane Reti said New Zealand’s science system was undergoing its most significant reform in more than three decades, which would make it more effective and create opportunities long-term.

“To better support and incentivise innovation for future economic growth, the government made the decision to disestablish Callaghan Innovation, and redistribute its key functions to other parts of the science, innovation and technology system.”

He said Callaghan Innovation was spread thinly across conflicting functions and “struggled to work to a clear, focused purpose”, tasked with delivering grants, advice, technical services and research, as well as innovation support for businesses.

Reti said the government had invested $70m for artificial intelligence research, and $71m for future materials and magnet technology, as part of the new Institute of Advanced Technology, and $42m for a new biodiscovery platform.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Sealord has confirmed 48 job losses as the company makes parts of its Nelson operations seasonal.

Sealord last month announced that it was closing its coated fish factory, resulting in the loss of 79 jobs.

The company originally proposed cutting a further 59 jobs under plans to operate its wetfish and by-products factories and fresh fish trawler during the hoki season from May to September, instead of year-round.

On Friday Sealord confirmed the final number of job losses was 48, saying staff were told in mid-October.

The wetfish factory will close in December and reopen in May.

In September chief executive Doug Paulin said the move to seasonal operations meant the company could retain most of its Nelson-based operations, including cold and dry store and office-based support roles, instead of closing the site completely.

“In total we would retain 81 permanent jobs and 400 seasonal roles and save over 90 percent of the economic benefits to the region,” he said.

Paulin said export products produced at the Nelson wetfish factory were loss-making every month, except in hoki season.

The loss had been exacerbated with recent price drops at the same time as sharp rises in costs and falling volumes of fish for harvesting and processing outside of hoki season.

The region has been rocked by job cuts in recent months, with Carter Holt Harvey telling staff in August it would shut its Eves Valley Sawmill, resulting in the loss of 142 jobs.

In September Griffin’s Snacks told staff it planned to close the Nelson factory that produces Proper Crisps, with operations moving to Auckland from late 2027, affecting 47 staff and Māori food and beverage company Kono announced it would wind down brewing operations at Motueka-based craft brewery Hop Federation from October with the loss of five jobs.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Treasury has warned the strength of the Crown’s balance sheet is likely to deteriorate if policy settings are not changed.

Its 2025 Investment Statement found liabilities were forecast to rise 33 percent by 2029 to $504 billion, as the debt grows to fund investment spending and operating deficits.

The increase in liabilities was also projected to outpace the increase in assets, with net worth expected to fall 10 percent to $172b.

As at June 2024, assets on the Crown’s balance sheet totalled $571b, and liabilities were $380b.

The ‘social’ portfolio spread $314b worth of assets across 141 entities such as transport, housing, education, and health.

$99b of assets were in the ‘commercial’ portfolio, which included “services related to strategic policy objectives, in a commercial manner,” such as Air New Zealand and the gentailers.

The ‘financial’ portfolio, which included entities like the Reserve Bank, ACC, and the Superannuation Fund, held $158b of assets, but also $280b of liabilities, accounting for 74 percent of the total.

The Treasury said there were ageing assets in the social portfolio that were becoming unfit for purpose, the commercial portfolio’s entities did not always meet performance expectations, and the financial portfolio held assets and liabilities facing different risks.

The balance sheet had more than doubled in size over the last decade, but assets and liabilities were projected to grow at a slower rate over the next ten years.

Since the last investment statement in 2022, assets had increased by 30 percent ($132b). Treasury said that was driven mainly by growth in physical assets, and more than half of that growth was down to revaluations, largely due to inflationary pressures.

Liabilities had increased by 35 percent ($98b), to fund investment and operating deficits.

Treasury secretary Iain Rennie said as demands on public services and investment had changed, the balance sheet had become increasingly important, and challenging to manage.

“The Investment Statement shows we need to improve our asset management – to get more value from existing investments, ensure we’re investing in the right assets, and improve our risk management and understanding.”

The Treasury suggested changes to balance sheet management in order to maintain New Zealand’s credit rating, and prepare the Crown for any shocks.

The suggestions are largely procedural, mostly focusing on “better” or “consistent” information and monitoring.

This included changes to decision-making processes, such as more consistent approaches to long-term planning across agencies, better business case development, and improving the information of assets, liabilities, and risks.

The Treasury also called for better asset management, saying some assets were underperforming, poorly maintained, and lacking quality information. It suggested more regular reviews of assets, clarifying the purpose of government ownership for each commercial entity, and adopting a more formal capital recycling programme.

“A formal capital recycling programme may be useful where government reallocates or reinvests capital from existing assets or infrastructure projects into new opportunities or projects to meet policy

objectives,” the report said.

“In this way assets that are no longer required or have limited ownership value are not retained. This can avoid the often increased operating and maintenance costs from ongoing ownership.”

The statement also said the Crown could manage the risks on its balance sheet better by centralising the management, and stress testing the combined fiscal balance sheet.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Retailer Briscoe Group sales dropped in the third-quarter sales, as consumers pulled back spending on sports goods.

• Total group Q3 sales $171.0m (-1.8%)
• Homeware sales +1.8%, sports -7.3%
• Group sales for nine months $542m (-0.7%)
• Re-affirms full-year profit forecast of about $60m

Managing director Rod Duke said the three months ended September were a mixed trading environment, with consumers buying household staples, but cutting back on discretionary spending, like sporting goods.

Duke said the group, which owns Briscoes home goods and Rebel Sports, switched strategy in the third quarter, from discounting prices to make sales to earning more on lower volumes.

“With inventory in excellent shape at half-year, we made a strategic decision to shift focus from driving top-line sales to stabilising gross profit margin percentage,” he said.

That led to a fall in sales for the three months, but homeware sales grew by 1.8 percent and margins on sports goods improved markedly, despite lower volumes.

“Both segments have maintained the quality and level of inventory heading into our critical fourth quarter. The decision means homeware and sports goods are well placed for the festive season.”

He said he was satisfied with the group’s overall performance over the first three quarters, especially as consumer confidence remained low.

“With sales less than one percent behind last year, gross profit margin stabilised, inventory in great shape and transformative projects well progressed, we are well placed to maximise the final quarter.”

He hoped recent interest rate cuts would boost consumer confidence and lift spending in the key holiday season.

Briscoe Group maintained its full-year profit forecast of of about $60m.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The owner of a new, independent Upper Hutt supermarket hopes he can offer locals an alternative to the big supermarket duopoly.

Plenty Foods supermarket opened in Brewtown on Thursday, the second Hutt Valley store in the portfolio of Wellington businessman Henry Hutcheon, who also owns Supersave in Naenae.

Despite a few technical issues, Hutcheon told Nine to Noon the opening went well.

“Unfortunately, the database we had errored out first thing in the morning, so we had to basically rebuild our entire database of all the products we had on the shelves – which takes a lot of time.”

Hutcheon said he would hire 40 staff to work at the store and he aimed to provide cheaper products for the community.

“We’ve hired most of our staff locally and we’ve got a lot of young people for the local workforce as well.

“We definitely will be working with community groups when they approach us – we will do everything in our power to make commodities cheaper and affordable for the locals.”

Hutcheon said he started working in the industry as a checkout operator in 2007, worked in supermarkets around the Wellington region, and he and his partner later bought the Supersave convenience store.

He said starting an independent supermarket was challenging the current market.

“There’s been some suppliers that have been willing to work really hard with us, there have been some that have taken a little bit of convincing and then there are some that have just proven to be very difficult,” Hutcheon said.

“I guess the bigger they are, the harder they are to deal with us – some of them have been quite disappointing.”

He said the supermarket aimed to stock “everything”, including a full produce department, butchery, bakery, fish cabinet, a hot cabinet with chickens and a cafe.

He had developed a pie with CJ’s Hangi, which the store would sell as well.

Upper Hutt mayor Peri Zee said it was great to see the supermarket stock local producers, including Dough Bakery products and The Pickery flowers.

“It’s awesome to see that they are using local businesses, which is beneficial to the local economy overall.”

She was encouraged to see a supermarket employing young people from the area and providing another option to compare prices.

“Having independently owned supermarkets is really helpful for that competition, because clearly, we have a competition problem in the supermarket sector.

“Having extra players come in is awesome and can be really helpful to reduce costs.”

Brewtown was a growing brewery precinct in Upper Hutt, she said, which had developed over the past few years to include a Sunday farmers’ market and event spaces.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

While animal blood might make some people squeamish, a New Zealand company putting it “to very good use” in the pharmaceutical industry is now expanding into South America.

Auckland BioSciences manufactures and exports animal-derived serum and plasma from mostly cattle and pig carcasses raised in Aotearoa. It is used in medical and life science research, including in the development of veterinary vaccines.

Serums are collected from animal blood, filtered, tested, and then used as a medium for cultivating viruses and cells to develop vaccines.

The firm has invested $4 million into the new sterile filtration site in partnership with major firm Montesera at Uruguay’s free-trade zone, Parque de las Ciencias – adding to its Tāmaki Makaurau home and another site in Brisbane.

In Uruguay, a team of a dozen staff will process and export South American-origin animal serum with capacity to filter up to 250,000 litres of animal blood each year.

Its freezer will be able to store up to 70 tonnes of serums, worth about $10m in inventory.

Company director and chairperson Gary Paykel said it will be about five times the size of its Auckland site and provided more choices for its pharmaceutical customers.

“It will enhance our reputation worldwide and offer a choice. We can say to them, we can supply you from a country that’s free of mad cow disease, free of foot and mouth and we know that the product is of the highest quality, or we can supply you from our Australian plant or South American.”

He said the company had come a long way in the past 12 years from starting out of a container with carcass supplies coming from an Ōtāhuhu abattoir.

“Only New Zealand product here, cattle and pigs, we use quite a bit of porcine blood, that’s used amongst other things for human eye drops.

“So it’s really a resource that was not used at all or wasted, if you like. Now it’s being put to very good use.”

Paykel said it had a range of interested suppliers which it will assess for quality and supply chain.

Major beef producer South America produced about a quarter of the world’s beef, driven by Brazil.

Uruguay, a country of just under 3.4 million people, led efforts to improve traceability of cattle from farm to plate over the past few decades.

Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard, New Zealand Ambassador to Uruguay Kathryn Beckett, and Uruguay president Yamandú Orsí President were at the opening of the site in late October.

Hoggard said on Facebook, the plant was “the largest New Zealand investment in Uruguay”.

Paykel said New Zealand’s role in life sciences and biotechnology globally had grown in recent years.

“We are very much part of a global biotech infrastructure, New Zealand is playing a growing role in the whole life sciences industry, actually.”

Auckland BioSciences exports to 18 countries including the European Union, the United States, Japan, Brazil and India.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The finance minister says New Zealand is at risk of missing out on film productions as international competition intensifies.

The government is expanding eligibility for the International Screen Production Rebate scheme to allow smaller budget productions and digital effects only projects to benefit from the rebate.

Nicola Willis said the country’s screen sector contributed $3.5 billion to the economy each year.

“These changes ensure New Zealand remains a serious contender in an increasingly competitive global screen industry.

“They will help diversify our screen economy, build stronger partnerships in growing markets across Asia and the Middle East, and keep Kiwi talent in steady work while attracting new investment, skills and technology.”

From January next year the minimum spend for productions eligible to access the scheme would be lowered from $15 million to $4m.

More mid-budget productions would be enabled to qualify for a 5 percent additional “uplift” – with that part of the rebate’s eligibility threshold lowered from $30m to $20m – and post-production, digital and visual effects only projects would now also be able to access the funding boost.

The rebates would be funded through the additional $577 million provided to the scheme in the last Budget, bringing its total funding to $1.09b.

Willis said the updates would empower the screen sector to attract a broader range of productions.

“Modern screen production is borderless and dynamic. By staying agile and globally connected, we can turn Kiwi creativity into competitive advantage – keeping New Zealand on the world stage and growing one of our most distinctive export industries.”

New Zealand Film Commission head of international attraction Philippa Mossman said changes to the rebate scheme would improve the position of the sector in an “intensely competitive” market.

New Zealand’s 20-25 percent rebate still lags behind other territories such as Australia (up to 40 percent), Ireland (32 percent), the UK (29 percent) and Canada (up to 29 percent).

Mossman said stronger rebates globally had seen fewer productions come to Aotearoa.

“We’re not at the top of the pack, and all over the world recently we’ve seen rebate rates increasing. It’s not a magic wand that will bring every single production in. We have to work hard to land every possible opportunity.”

She said the scheme had recently assisted productions such as Avatar: Fire and Ash, Minecraft, Spartacus: Chief of War and Predator: Badlands.

Mossman said the broader eligibility to the scheme would have flow-on benefits to tourism, hospitality and construction.

She said the move reinforced New Zealand’s reputation as a “creative powerhouse” in global film production.

A Screen NZ International survey in July revealed a sharp decline in productions and highlighted the need to improve the international competitiveness of the sector.

Vice chairperson Harry Harrison said the changes responded to the challenges facing the industry and acknowledged its contribution to the economy .

“Research has shown that every $1 of rebate investment generates more than $6 in economic return to New Zealand across Kiwi businesses, crew and creative professionals as well as tax payments back into the Government’s books.

“Kiwis make up over 82 percent of the workforce on these international productions, demonstrating the sector’s important role in employment and skills development,” Harrison said.

Actor Cliff Curtis said changes to the International Screen Production Rebate would make a real difference to the 34,000 people working in the country’s screen sector.

Curtis said people in industry were “heartened” to have the government listen to the sector’s pleas for greater support in the face of stiff international competition.

“These incentives are crucial. It means that we keep this connection with coming from where we come from and then going out into the big wide world and realising that we can lead. We’re not just in this race to survive we can actually lead our sector,” Curtis said.

He said the changes assisted the need to balance attracting international investment while also continuing to support local projects and story-telling.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand