DOC asks people to stay away from seals after pup forms ‘unhealthy bond’ with humans

Source: Radio New Zealand

A kekeno / New Zealand fur seal pup. Supplied / Department of Conservation

It may not be the ‘silly season‘, but that has not put a stop to naughty New Zealand fur seals causing mischief.

The Department of Conservation (DoC) is reminding the public that kekeno are not pets, as more and are spotted around the country.

New Zealand made international headlines this month, after footage of a seal pup wriggling through the front door of Sprig+Fern The Meadows in the Tasman town of Richmond went viral.

Another seal pup was spotted in Christchurch last week, with DoC having to intervene after a member of the public threatened to take it home.

Ranger Mailee Stanbury told RNZ that the pup had travelled several kilometres – from the suburb of Redcliffs, through the Heathcote River, all the way to Opawa – which was “not unusual”.

“It is normal for seal pups to go exploring up rivers, and sea lions have been seen as far inland as 60 kilometres,” she said.

“It is common to see them coming up the estuary at this time of year, exploring and fishing. With an increasing population around Banks Peninsula, there’s a chance we can expect to see more fur seals coming into residential environments around estuaries.”

While DOC would prefer to leave the pup alone, Stanbury said she had to move it “because it was unsafe from people”.

“Unless we absolutely need to, we prefer to take a hands-off, more natural approach.

“That’s the only way that wildlife can actually learn and explore – and I think they should be able to do so without threats from humans.”

DoC moved the pup “because it was unsafe from people”. Supplied / Department of Conservation

Stanbury said the pup was being hand-fed fish, and one person had even taken it from the Heathcote River and put it beside the road.

It had learned that people would give it food, Stanbury said, so it had started to habituate to them.

“There were men there who were saying that they were going to take the pup and put it in their bath at home, which is completely inappropriate. That is a very inappropriate way to treat New Zealand wildlife. We do not take them home.”

While Stanbury had taken the pup to Godley Head late Friday night, it had returned in search of more hand-fed fish by the morning.

The pup was first spotted at Taylors Mistake beach, passing by the Surf Life Saving Club, before loitering in the car park.

“It actually stopped some people from leaving because it went and sat right underneath the back wheel, and they couldn’t back out of the car park and go away. Even when they turned on the engine, it just got in closer under the car, so it really has no fear of humans or cars at all.

“And at that point, we made the call that we were going to need to take it quite a bit farther away – somewhere where it can’t hear or see people at all – and will hopefully be able to re-bond with its own kind and break this unhealthy bond that it’s now forming with humankind.”

Stanbury released the pup in a bay past Akaroa Harbour on Monday.

“These little seals are only just weaned from their mothers and need to learn to feed and survive in the wild. When people feed them or interact with them, they are putting its life in danger as it will bond with people and keep coming back to urban settings where it can be attacked by dogs or hit by a car.

“We urge the public to leave seals alone, give them a wide berth, and absolutely do not feed them.

“Ring the DoC hotline if you think a seal is injured, sick, or in danger.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Northland hit harder than most by climate change, report finds

Source: Radio New Zealand

Kimberlee and Gary Whitehead at their home in Pupuke Valley, north of Kāeo. RNZ/Peter de Graaf

Gary and Kimberlee Whitehead have lost count of the number of times their Far North property has flooded.

Water has come up through the floorboards, pets have been swept away, cars written off, and foundations damaged.

Now they feel anxious any time they hear rain on the roof.

Some people ask: Why don’t they just sell up and leave?

“We can’t,” Gary Whitehead said.

“I mean, I’m 58 now. I can’t sell the property because it’s an intolerable risk to life. No one’s going to buy it. I mean, what do I do? Go homeless?”

Whitehead said insurance was no help either.

“The insurance will only pay to fix the house. They won’t pay to lift the house or make it safe. And once you make so many insurance claims, they just cancel your insurance. So we can’t even really make another claim unless it’s a total loss.”

The Whiteheads had pinned their hopes on a joint council-government buyout scheme for homes damaged in the 2023 storms, but they were refused.

New stopbanks and spillways were protecting homes in flood-prone towns such as Kāeo and Moerewa, but there was little help for people living in isolated valleys like theirs.

“It’s okay if you’re in a town, but anyone that’s rural is just left to their own devices,” Gary Whitehead said.

A new report by the Climate Change Commission – the first to focus solely on Northland – found the region was hit harder than most by climate change.

That was partly due to the region’s exposure to storms, droughts and cyclones, but it was also shaped by socio-economic factors.

Flooding north of Dargaville during Cyclone Gabrielle. Kaipara District Council / Supplied

The report said the region’s exposure to the effects of climate change was amplified because many Northlanders lived in rural areas and were employed in “climate-sensitive” industries such as farming and forestry.

The authors said Northland stood out for its “social vulnerability” to climate change with almost 40 percent of its population living in areas of high deprivation and a similar proportion not in the labour force.

That meant Northlanders were less likely to have enough money to cope with crises and losses.

People who were already at a disadvantage had limited options for avoiding the negative effects of climate change and could be left behind as others adapted, the report stated.

For example, people with the money to do so could relocate out of harm’s way, while others had to stay in hazard zones where they could be hit again and again by floods or storms.

Many of those issues were concentrated for Māori, who made up 40 percent of Northland’s population, double the national average.

A large proportion of jobs held by Māori in Northland were in climate-sensitive primary industries and therefore vulnerable to droughts, flooding along rivers and coasts, and saltwater intrusion into ground water.

As well as examining the impact of climate change, the Commission’s case study looked at the ways local communities and businesses were responding.

Farmers told the Climate Change Commission about the “whiplash effect” of swinging from extreme rainfall to drought. RNZ / Liz Garton

Clive Stone, the taiao (environment) head for east coast iwi Ngātiwai, said flooding, even in summer, was a major concern.

“One of the communities we live in is a place called Whangaruru. It’s really impacted by heavy weather events. It gets closed down, kids can’t get to school. The flooding seems to be intensifying, which then leaves us isolated.”

Coastal erosion was another worry, especially when it threatened homes or wāhi tapu such as urupā (cemeteries).

“Large tracts of our coastline are disappearing and it seems to be accelerating. We put that directly on climate change.”

Stone said Ōakura residents were trying to reduce erosion by planting on sand dunes, while whānau in Punaruku were working with the council to reduce flooding by clearing forestry debris from their rivers.

The effects of climate change on the ocean also worried the iwi.

“The moana is so essential to Ngātiwai because a lot of our people get their sustenance from there. We are noticing changes that are affecting our ability to harvest kai from the moana. Things like caulerpa, a new weed that seems to really thrive on the warmer water. That’s another real big concern for us.”

Another person interviewed by the Commission was community consultant Zonya Wherry from North Hokianga.

She said one of the biggest climate-related challenges in her area – as highlighted by Cyclone Gabrielle in February 2023 – was the fragility of the power network.

Wherry said Hokianga residents had gone nine to 14 days without power, and three to five days without communications.

In many instances, no power also meant no running water.

Flooded roads in Kaipara District, Northland. RNZ / Soumya Bhamidipati

Modern communication systems – unlike the old copper-wire phone network – also required power, while roads blocked by slips and floods made it hard to bring in food or fuel for generators.

“We were out of power for days. That meant that some of our most vulnerable, our kuia, our kaumātua, who rely on power for water, for hygiene, for their medical equipment, were at high risk. So energy insecurity is huge here.”

Wherry said Northlanders had learnt from Cyclone Gabrielle with her marae, for example, installing solar power and satellite internet to ensure residents could stay connected to the outside world in future emergencies.

Projects were also underway around Hokianga to make the area more self-reliant in food and electricity.

Wherry said the cyclone response highlighted a disconnect between government, both local and central, and the needs of people on the ground.

She says the Climate Change Commission’s approach made a refreshing change.

“I was impressed with the team, especially commissioner herself, coming up and being on the ground and visiting all these remote areas, just wanting to hear from us. Hopefully this report is going to be a benchmark to start advocating for us on the ground.”

The report stated sudden downpours, cyclones and droughts were nothing new for Northlanders.

However, they had become more intense in the past decade, in particular during the summer of 2022-23 when four major storms battered the region in seven weeks.

The resulting damage to roads, the railway and other infrastructure cost hundreds of millions of dollars to repair.

A subsequent study found warming caused by human activity had increased the total rainfall dumped by Cyclone Gabrielle by 10 percent and lifted peak hourly rainfall rates by 20 percent.

Downed trees and extensive flooding in Kaipara during Cyclone Gabrielle. RNZ / Soumya Bhamidipati

The Climate Change Commission report found other effects were more gradual but also had profound implications.

Farmers interviewed for the report described the double whammy of rising flood risk plus more frequent and longer droughts, and the “whiplash” effect of swinging between extremes.

Higher temperatures and changing rainfall patterns promoted the spread of new pests such as Madagascar ragwort, a fast-spreading weed toxic to livestock, and fall army worm, a caterpillar that could decimate crops such as maize.

On the upside, tropical crops such as dragonfruit, bananas and pineapples were now being grown in Northland.

The country’s first commercial coffee farm started operating in the hills above Doubtless Bay in 2023.

However, growers stressed that those niche crops could not replace the staples grown in Northland, and small producers were limited in their ability to commercialise new crops.

Other measures described in the report to mitigate climate change effects included a water storage reservoir built at Ahipara by Far North iwi Te Rarawa to supply its market gardens.

At nearby Kaitāia, the $15 million Awanui flood scheme aimed to prevent a repeat of the devastating 1958 flood that sent metre-deep water coursing through the low-lying town.

Although not yet complete, it was already proving successful.

During a storm in 2022 the volume of water flowing down the Awanui River was almost 50 percent higher than in 1958, but the town did not flood.

The report, called Ā Te Taitokerau urutau i ngā āhuarangi/Responding to a changing climate in Northland, is the fourth case study to date by the Climate Change Commission and the first to cover an entire region.

The other studies focussed on Wairoa, South Dunedin and Westport.

The Northland study was based on meetings with a broad cross-section of groups and individuals in March 2025.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Light-fingered army corporal Jackie Te Weehi to be sentenced after guilty plea at court martial

Source: Radio New Zealand

who stole off her fellow soldiers and the Defence Force (NZDF) during a touch rugby tournament is waiting to find out her fate.

Corporal Jackie Te Weehi at her Court Martial at Whenuapai Air Base on Monday, 8 December 2025. RNZ / Kim Baker Wilson

A light-fingered army corporal who stole off her fellow soldiers and the Defence Force (NZDF) during a touch rugby tournament is waiting to find out her fate.

Corporal Jackie Te Weehi pocketed $3422.57 of team member and NZDF funding and prosecutors are calling for her detention and dismissal.

The Territorial Force soldier has since paid back the money she swindled.

Te Weehi pleaded guilty at a Court Martial at Whenuapai Air Base on Monday to theft by person in a special relationship, and making a false official document.

The maximum penalties are seven years’ and two years’ imprisonment respectively.

NZDF prosecutors said Te Weehi had breached the trust and integrity that were fundamental to the armed forces.

It said she could not reasonably be put in a position of trust again.

“The fact that Corporal Te Weehi was in a position of trust and authority is a severely aggravating factor, she was the team manager,” prosecutors said.

They said the fact there was a representative charge spanning months showed the offending was pre-meditated.

After the hearing of evidence and her guilty pleas and convictions being entered on Monday, Te Weehi will face being sentenced on Tuesday afternoon.

The offending

Defence Force prosecutors Lt Letitia Smith and Sub Lt Angus Graham laid out the case before Judge Bill Hastings.

It was July 2023 when the New Zealand Army Men’s Touch Team was invited to play in the Australian Defence Force Touch Championship in Australia.

Te Weehi, an Acting Sergeant at the time, was manager of the team.

She overcharged team members and asked for money that wasn’t used, including asking for donations for the coach’s emergency bereavement flight back to New Zealand.

She took money at various points.

Te Weehi pleaded guilty at a Court Martial at Whenuapai Air Base on Monday. RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly

Te Weehi sent a budget to team members on 1 August 2023 saying they needed to pay $635 to cover the trip – $531 for flights, $80 for uniforms and $24 for other costs.

Days later she was told that sponsorships meant flight costs had dropped to $400.

She then told team members they needed to pay $535 in total, when it should have been $504.

Between 27 July and 23 August, team members put money into Te Weehi’s personal bank account.

In all, she got $8726 that was supposed for be for tournament expenses.

Between 15 and 23 August Te Weehi transferred $5600 to another service person who booked flights and then paid $1200 for uniforms.

In total she spent $7200 on the team’s needs.

But she held onto $940 from overcharging each player, asking for money for expenses that weren’t used and not repaying two players who overpaid.

Another player wanted to take his civilian daughter to the tournament and was told she would need to pay full price for the flight.

But Te Weehi knowingly put her on a seat subsidised by the Army and held onto the extra $586, which she used for personal expenses.

Then, she got $3000 of sponsorships from the Army Logistics Regiment that was supposed to be given to team members equally as a reimbursement.

Te Weehi, while distributing the money, told players there were hidden costs and insurance fees when there weren’t, and held onto $939.67 and used it personally.

Money from a Manager Grant for extra expenses was also paid into her bank account for the likes of sports drinks and washing powder, but was not used for those.

On 18 October, she asked players for more contributions, $490 for the team and miscellaneous costs.

She only put $294.70 of it toward those, and held onto the rest.

Then, when the team coach had to return to New Zealand urgently during the tournament for a family bereavement, the flight was charged to an NZDF credit card.

Te Weehi raised $189.60 from donations from four team members but gave none of the money to the coach or the Defence Force.

On 25 October she offered to order new team t-shirts for the team with eight players together handing over $372, but the shirts were never ordered.

On the second charge of making a false official document, she made a document addressed to the Chief of Army saying she had arranged travel insurance for the team.

A later investigation by Military Police found Te Weehi had never got insurance.

“Corporal Te Weehi blatantly lied, this was not spur of the moment offending,” Lt Smith said of the second charge at the Court Martial.

She also told the judge Cpl Te Weehi was not acting in any form other than self interest.

Lt Smith said Te Weehi had “a clear unwillingness” to comply with the ethos and values of the NZDF.

Te Weehi’s defence

When interviewed under caution in October last year, Corporal Te Weehi asked to terminate the interview and exercise her right to refrain from making further statements.

At the Court Martial, Te Weehi’s lawyer, David Pawson, told the military panel it was “absolutely warranted” to have her dismissed.

“No problem with that at all,” he said.

But he argued she should not face detention, and that dismissal was a higher punishment than detention.

“She immediately pleaded guilty, she is remorseful, she’s paid back the donations and she’s written a letter of remorse,” he said.

He also urged the military panel to consider the effect of Cpl Te Weehi’s name being published by the media.

“I invite you to consider about being empathetic too, I’m not saying be soft but I’m not saying let’s be harsh either,” he said.

“Because at the end of the day Corporal Te Weehi is toward the end of her long and distinguished service.”

“We’ve all made mistakes,” he told the panel before it considered its sentence.

No victims were willing to provide victim impact statements.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

GST turns 40: Is it here to stay?

Source: Radio New Zealand

The tax, which is applied to almost everything you buy, has turned 40. 123RF

Happy birthday, GST. You probably pay it every day – 70c or so on a bottle of milk, $150 on an airfare.

But did you know the tax, which is applied to almost everything you buy, has turned 40?

This December marks 40 years since the law changed to allow Goods and Services Tax (GST) to be introduced in New Zealand. It took effect the following October.

Alan Bullot, a GST expert at Deloitte, said there was a lot to celebrate about the tax.

“New Zealand certainly wasn’t a trailblazer, but the GST legislation we brought in in New Zealand is seen universally as almost being best practice from a tax design point of view.

“It has a broad base that has very few exceptions and it just gets on with the business of what the tax is supposed to do, which is collect some money for the government to go off and do what the government needs to.”

He said when GST was first introduced in New Zealand, about 30 or 40 countries had a similar tax.

“Now, it’s the vast majority of countries other than America that have a national GST or VAT regime.

“Governments just love GST or VATs because they can forecast its collection a lot better because it functions over the whole economy. It’s a test of what the economy is doing.

“If you think about company tax, if I make a profit Inland Revenue can say ‘you made a $100 profit in the company and 28c is coming in’. That’s great, but if I’ve made a loss for two or three years, even if I made a profit of $100 this year the government might not get anything because I’ve got to go through my loss that’s in there.

“It’s much harder for the government to forecast exactly how much money will be coming in from income tax.”

More change coming?

Over the years, the rate has lifted from 10 percent to 12.5 percent to the 15 percent we now pay.

Bullot said it had also had to keep up with technology.

GST now applied to almost all international purchases imported into New Zealand.

“If you think about 1985, you might have heard of a CD. You may have seen a CD, that would be the pinnacle of music. You would have had a Walkman, you certainly weren’t able to download endless amounts of songs from overseas, you couldn’t download any movies.

“If you wanted to order anything online you couldn’t. If you wanted to order something from overseas that would have been pretty difficult… it was just so different in terms of the way that things would operate.

“The fundamentals of GST haven’t changed, but it has had to keep adapting to the economy it operates in.”

Every so often, there are calls for GST to be taken off things like public transport or food. Bullot said that was possible, but there would be drawbacks.

“Every time you do that, you add a bit of additional complications for businesses that are having to deal with it. And more to the point, if you’re not collecting it here, where are you collecting it?”

Bullot said Australia had more exemptions than New Zealand, but had been discussing whether to increase its coverage.

Treasury recently calculated that if nothing else were to change, GST might have to increase to 32 percent to cover the cost of an ageing population.

Bullot said another option would be not to have income tax but to charge a much higher rate of GST.

“Would people accept the doubling of GST?”

He said he could not see a future where GST was not a very significant part of the tax take.

“I think that it will stay that way. I think it is unlikely for it to increase from this rate from a practical political perspective. I think it is much more a case of we just need to keep making sure that it’s fit for purpose.”

He said Inland Revenue should change the rules if GST was not working as intended over time.

“I think Inland Revenue needs to be able to use that power perhaps a little more frequently sometimes rather than us going into sort of long technical debates… Sometimes we should just say what’s best for ‘New Zealand Inc’ and let’s move on.”

Roger Douglas, finance minister at the time GST was introduced. TVNZ

He said it was notable the level of GST tax debt had also increased recently and the government would need to continue to take action on it.

“I think it really needs to be a focus, because GST isn’t working if we’re getting information on returns but no cash. GST’s job is to collect large amounts of money in a consistent manner for the government, for the government to do the government’s programmes with the least amount of economic damage to the country in terms of compliance costs, uncertainty…

“Businesses can work around odd rules as long as they can see that they’re going to be there and they’re not going to flip and change.”

Is the tax regressive?

A major criticism of GST is that it is regressive because lower-earning households tend to spend more of their money, and spend more of it on things that attract GST.

Bullot said when the tax was introduced, benefits were increased to help cover the cost. He said the tax might not be as regressive as some people worried.

“When you look at what people in the lower incomes are spending their money on, a lot of it is residential rent, which is one of the big aspects that doesn’t have GST charged on it.

“Whereas if you are going out and you’re lucky enough to be in the financial position to buy a new house, for instance, when you’re buying that new house off the developer and say that was $500,000, you’re paying them $75,000 GST on top of that.”

Financial services and rent were some of the few things exempt from GST.

Could we introduce a tax like this now?

New taxes tend to be politically difficult. Bullot said the environment was different in 1985.

“It was coming in as part of a range of things… the floating of the New Zealand dollar, deregulation, we had a wage price freeze not many years before that, we’d had carless days and the GST coming through was just another one of those things.

“There was some pushback ,but not massive amounts, and there were significant cuts in the top rate of income tax.”

Infometrics chief forecaster Gareth Kiernan. RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

Good sales pitch

Infometrics chief forecaster Gareth Kiernan said it helped that the tax replaced other complicated sales taxes, and happened alongside income tax cuts.

He said income tax was almost 75 percent of the tax take in March 1986, and that had dropped to 69 percent in June this year as the share of GST lifted to 24.4 percent.

The top income tax rate dropped from 66 percent two years later.

“The pre-MMP political environment was such that large changes could be made relatively easily, whereas political policy now is often very much about compromise between the various parties in the governing coalition.

“Interestingly, the yearbook also notes reviews in 1967 and 1982, both of which recommended greater reliance on indirect taxes, with mention also being made of the need to reform existing indirect taxes – so it wasn’t like GST was something that came completely out of the blue.

“I can’t comment on the sales job that Labour did around introducing GST in the 1980s, but it must have been reasonably good, given that the party was re-elected in 1987.

“Perhaps an analogy can be drawn with the current (longstanding) debate about capital gains tax. From an economist’s point of view, a move to tax profits on property more fully is a positive, because it means that person who has lots of money and assets would then be taxed more fully than currently, compared to the low-asset wage-earner who doesn’t have the ability to tap into these tax-free gains.

“It seems to me that the problem is in the sales pitch, which for the last six years has been ‘here’s a new tax’, rather than ‘this tax change will enable us to reduce income tax for the 80 percent of the population who aren’t property investors’.

“But even with its recent announcement, Labour was finding new ways to spend money from the additional tax, rather than just looking to make the tax system fairer.”

Economist Shamubeel Eaqub said he thought it would be possible for a government to do something similar with a tax on capital.

“It will happen with the political calculus of bankrupting our grandchildren forces us to.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Supermarkets ‘know how far they can push people’: How to get a good deal on Christmas groceries

Source: Radio New Zealand

What surprises does Santa have in store this Christmas? 123RF

Shoppers who look beyond the cheapest price tag might be able to save on their Christmas groceries in supermarkets trying to extract top dollar from them, Consumer NZ says.

Spokesperson Gemma Rasmussen said there was a risk people buying the item with the lowest advertised price might miss out on something that would be cheaper on a per-unit basis.

“We know the supermarkets will be filled with specials like multi-buy deals and member prices as we get closer to the big day – using unit pricing can help you cut through the promotions and figure out the best value.

“Grocery shopping can be stressful and expensive at the best of times. Unit pricing is an easy way to see through all the different brands, quantities and promotional chaos. So, instead of just grabbing the big container of custard, thinking it’s better value, you can check that it really is. You might find you’re paying less per 100g if you buy the smaller container.”

Supermarkets are now required to display a unit price for items as well as the overall package price, to make it easier to compare different sizes.

Rasmussen said Consumer research showed many people found that useful when products came in different sizes or when something was on special and they wanted to work out which size was the most price-effective.

“If you need eggs for whipping up the pavlova, unit pricing will make it easy to see what you’re paying for each egg regardless of whether you’re comparing six-, 10-, 12- or 18-packs.”

Consumer looked at the cost of creating a pavlova at Rasmussen’s local supermarket. The shopping list included eggs, caster sugar, vanilla extract, cornflour and cream.

Eggs can vary in price. Morgane Perraud / Unsplash

“We compared the cost of buying the cheapest and then the cheapest unit price option for each item.

“The cheapest overall picks cost a total of $18.61 and would have been enough to make one pavlova, with a small amount of leftover sugar and plenty of vanilla extract and cornflour to spare.

“When we went for the cheapest unit price items we would have spent more in total, at $37.37, but we would have bought enough produce to make three pavlovas. This version equated to a cost of just under $12.50 per pavlova, with two eggs, sugar, cream, cornflour and vanilla to spare.”

She said shoppers would have a lot of things vying for their attention in the supermarket.

“Maybe you’ve got a lot of things that you need to buy, there’s a lot of pricing and promotional activity that’s happening with signs and the unit pricing is very small.

“So sometimes it can be hard to give your attention to that, but we have heard that 64 percent of New Zealanders have said that unit pricing is helping them.

“Often when we are looking at a product, maybe you’re looking at Weetbix for example, and one packet which is smaller might be on sale and so automatically you think that is a better deal, but if you to look at the unit price of the Weetbix between multiple sizing, you’ll actually be able to see where the best value lies.

“We completely understand that sometimes purchasing more is not cost-effective for families, given how stretched many budgets are particularly around Christmas time, but by looking at the unit pricing, it really does enable you to understand the value of a product and how much you could be paying for that.”

She said supermarkets sometimes made their savings sound better than they were.

“We would really advise people to try and cut out the noise with that type of with the specials and the promotions and to lean on that unit pricing a little.”

She said anyone going to the supermarket at the moment would think there were deals to be had everywhere.

“Supermarkets are really good at creating this feeling of savings and promotions. Supermarkets are experts of customer behaviour and they know the things people are going to be buying around this time of year.

“Obviously there are benefits like things like strawberries, blueberries, raspberries… we get these seasonality benefits where the price of certain items do come down, but I think that those supermarkets’ modus operandi is to get as much money as possible from shoppers, and I think they employ really sophisticated technology in terms of those price points and knowing how far that they can push people, particularly around the festive season.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Schools’ spending on cruises, travel, hospitality scrutinised

Source: Radio New Zealand

Stock photo. The auditor-general’s annual report on schools’ 2024 accounts said more schools than the previous year were struggling financially or spent money inappropriately RNZ/ Nick Monro

Auditors have called out schools for spending their money on boat cruises, food for local families and travel for principals – and in some cases their partners.

The auditor-general’s annual report on schools’ 2024 accounts said more schools than the previous year were struggling financially or spent money inappropriately, and many still failed to plan ahead for building maintenance.

The report said 27 schools needed Ministry of Education guarantees for their finances – about four times as many as the previous year.

It said schools needed guidance on “sensitive expenditure” and on planning maintenance for their buildings.

The report said one school board provided so little financial information auditors could not give an opinion on their accounts.

That was the combined board of Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Manurewa and Te Wharekura Manurewa and applied to their 2021, 2022 and 2023 audits.

“The school board did not retain accounting records and relevant supporting documents to underpin the financial statements,” the report said.

“We also could not obtain evidence that controls over the school’s expenditure and payroll were in place and operating effectively during the years that we were auditing.”

It said auditors highlighted issues in 64 audit reports and at 21 schools this related to use of schools’ $6000-a-year fund for professional coaching and support for principals.

“We drew attention to some spending on personal travel for the principal and, in some instances, companions because there was no clear business purpose for it,” the report said.

“In some instances, there was a lack of documentation or receipts to support the business purpose of the principal’s travel. For most of these, there was a clear business rationale for the travel, but there was additional travel and spending (such as on tourist activities) that appeared to be personal in nature.

“Any personal travel incorporated into business travel should be at no additional cost to the school.”

Some of the larger sums involved included:

  • Glenview School in Hamilton spent $29,458 on trips to Canada, Vietnam, and Samoa that had business purposes but did not provide enough evidence that all the spending had a clear business purpose or was in keeping with expectations about how public funds were used.
  • Fairfield College in Hamilton paid $17,155 for its principal to travel to Alaska and Canada. The travel through Alaska and Canada was for research, but there was not enough evidence that all the spending, including during stopovers in Hawai’i and New York, had a clear business purpose.
  • Haeata Community Campus School paid $18,500 for a trip to Queenstown for professional coaching and well-being for its senior leadership team but did not provide enough evidence that all the spending had a clear business purpose.
  • Maraenui Bilingual School in Napier paid $9086 for the now-former principal to attend a relative’s tangi and $7058 for that principal and a family member to travel to Rarotonga but did not provide enough evidence that the spending had a clear business purpose linked to student outcomes.

The report said the Ministry of Education had developed new guidance and criteria for spending on professional coaching and well-being support which would be published early next year.

Other sensitive spending issues included:

  • Rotorua School’s principal spending $38,882 of school funds on meals and entertainment for 44 students and adults on a trip to the US in 2023 but not providing receipts.
  • Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Mangere spending $35,025 on hospitality and entertainment for staff including “$22,833 on a boat cruise for 45 people and other spending that we consider is neither moderate nor conservative”.
  • Sutton Park School, which spent $11,017 for a staff planning meeting at SkyCity and “distributed $14,227 of food to families of school pupils during the Covid-19 lockdown and gave $4000 of Pak’nSave gift vouchers to families of school pupils for the vaccination drive, which did not have a clear business purpose”.
    • The report said auditors noted some instances where schools broke the law.

      It said two schools met the costs of an international student through a scholarship, even though legislation required schools charge fees that at least covered the costs of tuition and capital facilities.

      Eight schools borrowed more money than they were allowed to and 10 schools breached conflict of interest requirements by entering contracts with board members worth more than $25,000 without the secretary for education’s approval.

      The report said 51 schools did not provide enough evidence about their plans for ongoing maintenance of their buildings.

      The report said some schools did not keep adequate records of community-raised funds or sports fees.

      Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

I accidentally got sunburnt – what should I do?

Source: Radio New Zealand

As more of us head outdoors for beach days, hikes and barbecues, experts are reminding us that sunburn isn’t just uncomfortable — it can cause long-term damage.

Dr Sharad Paul from Skin Surgery Clinic says it can speed up aging, cause pigmentation, and increase your risk of skin cancer.

Dermatology Society spokesperson Dr AJ Seine adds sun damage often starts young.

Dermatology Society’s spokesperson AJ Seine is based in Tauranga at Skin Centre.

Supplied / Wayne Tait Photography

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

NZ Cricket CEO Scott Weenink ‘on leave’ as governance spat escalates

Source: Radio New Zealand

NZ Cricket CEO Scott Weenink is understood to be entering mediation over his job. Alan Lee

NZ Cricket chief executive Scott Weenink has stood down from day-to-day duties at the national body amid an ongoing fight for his survival.

RNZ understands Weenink went on leave as of 5pm on Friday ahead of mediation with the NZ Cricket board over his future.

It is understood Paul Wicks KC is advising the board on the process ahead, including the possibility of negotiating an exit agreement with Weenink.

In a statement, NZC’s manager of public affairs Richard Boock denied the national body had started an employment process with Weenink.

“He’s taken some time off to be with his family at the start of the school holidays,” Boock said.

Boock added an agreed date for return had been set for 19 December.

However, sources say Weenink offered to go on leave as his position at NZC has become increasingly untenable as he has been sidelined from attending key events.

“He basically exists in a state of purgatory right now,” said one insider.

Weenink’s sudden absence marks a dramatic escalation in a battle that has been brewing over several months.

RNZ last month reported Weenink was “fighting for his survival” amid a power struggle over the future of the domestic game.

Weenink faced allegations of working to “actively undermine” a bid by a private consortium to establish a new T20 franchise competition – a proposal supported by all six major associations and the NZ Cricket Players’ Association (NZCPA).

All of six of the major NZ Cricket associations are supporting a bid for a new privately-funded T20 league. Photosport

However, several senior cricket figures told RNZ while a proposed private Twenty20 franchise league has been a flashpoint for tensions, the crisis runs far deeper.

According to one source, concern around Weenink’s leadership has been simmering for several months, culminating in a letter sent to the NZ Cricket board on 16 October following a series of meetings between the six major associations.

In that letter, the major association chairs warned the board that the relationship with the CEO had become “irretrievable”, stating the network had lost “respect, trust and confidence” in Weenink.

The source said concerns about Weenink were also raised directly with the NZ Cricket board chair Diana Puketapu-Lyndon and later by follow-up letter in July – well before the concept of NZ20 was first pitched to the national body.

It is understood the major associations have obtained independent legal representation from high profile employment lawyer Stephen Langton, who has gone through a process of formally documenting the concerns of each of the regions.

Asked about the issues raised by the major associations over a period of several months, Boock responded: “NZC wouldn’t comment on that type of speculation.”

Martin Snedden, a former CEO of NZ Cricket, was part of a group alleging a “campaign to remove” Weenink as CEO Photosport

Plea to stop ‘playing the man’

While the major associations and NZCPA are keen to divorce the NZ20 from the conversation over Weenink’s leadership, there is a feeling among some in the cricket community that his lack of support for the concept has led to a “campaign to see the CEO removed”.

Last week, a group of four NZC life members wrote to the board chairs and directors of the national body, each of the major associations, the NZCPA and the NZ20 establishment committee to express their “dismay” at the damage caused to cricket’s reputation and leadership of the game as a result of the “growing dysfunction within New Zealand’s cricket family”.

“Currently it appears that the focus on NZ20, and other T20 opportunities, has been somewhat sidelined, as the dysfunction within the NZC board, NZC’s troubles with the MAs and with the NZCPA, and a campaign to see the NZC CEO removed, is publicly laid bare day after day,” said the letter, signed by Sir Richard Hadlee, Lesley Murdoch, Stephen Boock and Martin Snedden.

“We are deeply saddened by and worried about the resulting damage already impacting cricket’s reputation.

“We urge all those involved to stop ‘playing the man’ and, instead, focus solely on ‘playing the ball’.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Mariameno Kapa-Kingi resolute on her return to Parliament

Source: Radio New Zealand

Mariameno Kapa-Kingi is returning to Parliament for the first time after being temporarily reinstated to Te Pāti Māori. VNP / Phil Smith

MP for Te Tai Tokerau Mariameno Kapa-Kingi is returning to Parliament for the first time after being temporarily reinstated to Te Pāti Māori.

Kapa-Kingi contested her expulsion in court last week and got her membership back in time for the party’s annual general meeting in Rotorua over the weekend.

She told RNZ she wanted to be included in the Māori Party’s weekly caucus meeting, though she was yet to get an invite.

“It makes Parliamentary sense to me to do that and I’ve prepared myself for that but I would expect that a discussion or a reaching out would happen. We’ll see.”

Regardless of getting an invite to the party’s weekly hui, she said she would be showing up and working this week.

“I’ve already had a couple of meetings in terms of the next two weeks. We know that the House is likely to go into urgency because there’s still quite a bit of work to push through.

“I’ll be there as usual, first thing in the morning … and we’ll set ourselves up in that way. I haven’t heard anything from the party, anything formal yet, but I’ll be at the House and ready if any of that comes through.”

Kapa-Kingi said she had received a lot of respect and love at Te Pāti Māori’s AGM over the weekend.

“There was certainly a lot of photo interest and the number of people, I’m talking from across the hui, not just people who I know, but definitely a number from across each of the electorates who were overtly kind, respectful, loving and supportive. They were all of those things directly.

“It didn’t surprise me that a lot of them were women, wahine Māori and wahine Pākehā, that were overtly expressing you know, that sort of ‘good on you Meno’, that kind of thing.”

Expelled Te Tai Tonga MP Tākuta Ferris wasn’t at the AGM but published an Instagram story at the weekend, saying, “What Te iwi Māori doesn’t need is a political leader driven by UTU’.”

While Kapa-Kingi didn’t have a speaking slot at the hui, she said Dame Naida Glavish spoke on behalf of Tai Tokerau.

“She got really straight and plain in her reo Māori that only Tai Tokerau can take Meno out because it’s Tai Tokerau voters that put her in.”

Kapa-Kingi said Glavish also laid down key messages from a large hui at Kohewhata marae in Kaikohe a few weeks ago.

Te Pāti Māori’s leadership had been invited but did not attend.

“She laid that down very clearly and had the executive hear that. Obviously up to them how they understand it,” Kapa-Kingi said.

Glavish also shared a message from women in Northland about how they thought the Te Tai Tokerau MP had been treated, she said.

“They are absolutely disgusted with the way the president has treated me and the way in which he would address and assault me.

“Their kōrero was you are not suitable to be the president … and that we will persist with our plans for the Tai Tokerau from the voice of people.

“It’s not the executive that runs the people, it’s the people, the voices of the people, that will decide what is best for Tai Tokerau.”

Dame Naida Glavish spoke on behalf of Tai Tokerau at the AGM, Kapa-Kingi said. Lucy Xia

Asked if she thought the executive had understood this message, Kapa-Kingi said it was loud and clear for everyone that was present.

“Naida is very straight. There was nothing grey, no nuance in her kōrero. What they then do with that is yet to be seen.”

Kapa-Kingi said it was too early to say if the party had made any progress at the AGM.

“I haven’t watched or heard [Tamihere’s] discussion after the AGM but there was certainly a lot of contest to the discussion from the front table inside the room.

“There was a lot of contest and questioning and clarification, which is typical actually in an AGM, but there was definitely an edge to this.”

She said she didn’t have any interactions with the party’s president John Tamihere or party co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi over the weekend.

“You need to keep yourself safe, I don’t mean that in a dastardly way, I just mean you need to contain and moderate yourself.

“Naida was very clear, she was very clear with me; Tai Tokerau, I will carry that voice.

“It’s one of the most comforting things when you’ve got a he kahurangi, he rangatira just saying it’s okay, you’ve done your bit, you’ve done the heavy lifting. We’ve already got this decision from court so we’ll take this now.”

Kapa-Kingi said she was looking forward to taking a break over summer and would not change her mind about contesting the Te Tai Tokerau seat next year.

“Not at all. I am as resolute as I was when we first made the decisions to move a particular way and in fact I’m as resolute as I was when Tariana asked me to run.

“Of course there’s ups and downs and life is always present and this situation now, but I’m as resolute as I was then and I’m determined.”

She wanted those in her electorate to take a break over summer too.

“Keep connected to the idea that by Māori, for Māori, and all those things Māori that you value, those are still the things that in my heart our party is about.

“Fundamentally, tikanga is critical, te reo is critical, your connections to your marae and all of those very deeply traditional Māori things are critical.

“So connect, reconnect over Christmas with everybody that you love, care about and want to spend time with and just focus on those things because there’s a lot to come in the next year.”

A substantive hearing into Kapa-Kingi’s future in Te Pāti Māori will be heard in the High Court in Wellington on 2 February 2026.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Government to reveal Resource Management Act replacement

Source: Radio New Zealand

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon (R) and RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

The government will release its long-awaited replacement to the Resource Management Act, which the Prime Minister has described as a “game changer” for New Zealand.

Details of exactly what the replacement will look like will be revealed on Tuesday afternoon, but the government has already signalled the RMA will be replaced by two new pieces of legislation.

Both pieces of legislation will have more of a focus on private property rights.

A Planning Act will be focused on regulating the “use, development, and enjoyment” of land, while the Natural Environment Act will be focused on the use, protection, and enhancement of the natural environment.

On Monday, Christopher Luxon said the RMA was “broken” and was the “root cause” of many of New Zealand’s economic challenges.

“Everyone knows that the RMA is broken,” he said.

“It has held us back for 30 years, and it’s turned us into a country that says no far too often. With our government’s new planning system, there will be less talking and filling in forms, and more building, and more growing.”

Luxon said officials had estimated up to 46 percent of consent and permit applications required under the existing RMA could be removed under the new planning system.

Shortly after the coalition came into government it repealed Labour’s replacement of the RMA, which had only passed into law two months before the election.

The Natural and Built Environment Act and the Spatial Planning Act were instead replaced by the old RMA until the coalition could introduce its own replacement.

Despite repealing Labour’s reforms, Luxon said the government had reached out to Labour to seek bipartisanship on its own reforms.

Labour leader Chris Hipkins said he had a few “informal conversations” with RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop about the legislation.

“I don’t think that this merry-go-round of constant repeal and replace, repeal and replace, repeal and replace, is sustainable,” Hipkins said.

“So if we can find ways to support large parts of what the government are doing, we will do that. If there are areas where we disagree, we’ll be clear on what those areas are. But they won’t necessarily involve a whole other cycle of repeal and replace.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand