Police name man being sought in relation to Pahiatua homicide

Source: New Zealand Police

Police are urgently seeking a man in relation to a homicide investigation underway in Pahiatua.

Jeremy Robertson, pictured, is in his 50s and is of solid build.

Officers want to speak with him in relation to an incident on Thursday 15 October, where a woman was located deceased in a residential property that afternoon.

Detective Senior Sergeant Dave Thompson, Area Investigations Manager, says it is believe Jeremy was driving a red Mitsubishi ASX, registration QGU91 (an impression is attached).

“This vehicle was taken from the victim’s address in Pahiatua, and Police located it unoccupied at the Blue and Green Lakes lookout on Tarawera Road, Rotorua,” he says.

It is believed Jeremy arrived in the Tarawera Road area in the Mitsubishi around 2am on Thursday 15 October.

Members of the public have seen the vehicle parked at the lookout carpark from around 8am on Friday 16 October.

“Police are keen to hear from anyone that may have seen this vehicle, in this area, between 2am on Thursday 15 and 8am on Friday 16 October,” Detective Senior Sergeant Thompson says.

“We are also interested in any sightings of Jeremy in the Tarawera Road, Rotorua area from Thursday 15 October.”

It is not clear if Jeremy is still in the area or has left. Should you see him, do not approach him but call 111 immediately and advise Police.

Non-urgent information can be passed to please contact Police via 105 and quote file number 251015/6286.

Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

ENDS

Issued by the Police Media Centre

Supporting school leaders to drive change

Source: New Zealand Government

Education Minister Erica Stanford has launched the Curriculum Roadshow for Leaders, a nationwide initiative designed to support school leaders as they lead curriculum change across New Zealand. 

“The Roadshow was developed in direct response to requests from the sector for more support. It’s about the importance of collaboration, leading through changes, and sharing best practice. It focuses on helping schools implement a strengthened national curriculum with greater clarity and confidence,” Ms Stanford says. 

The programme brings together national and international experts, including keynote speaker Dr Nathaniel Swain, who share evidence-based insights on structured teaching approaches. 

It offers a clear overview of the curriculum changes, practical strategies for implementation, and resource packs to support planning and professional conversations with staff.

As part of the wider curriculum refresh, the Roadshow also supports school leaders to prepare for the staged release of curriculum content. The final curriculum content for Years 0-10 English and Mathematics is available now for use from the start of Term 1, 2026.

Other learning areas (Social Sciences, Science, Health and Physical Education, the Arts, Technology, Learning Languages) will be rephased and introduced in two stages in 2027 and 2028. This provides schools with more time to plan and progress their implementation. 

“This Government remains committed to getting 80 per cent of Year 8 students achieving at or above curriculum expectations by 2030. This Roadshow will help equip school leaders with the tools, knowledge, and networks they need to lead curriculum change that delivers better outcomes so more students reach their potential,” Ms Stanford says.

Consultation on the Code of Practice for the Security of Radioactive Material: ORS C5 2021

Source: New Zealand Ministry of Health

Publication date:

The Director for Radiation Safety (the Director) intends to review the Code of Practice for the Security of Radioactive Material: ORS C5 2021 (ORS C5 2021) . The review will be conducted in accordance with section 90 of the Radiation Safety Act 2016 (the Act).  

The Director is appointed under section 76 of the Act.

About the review

The purpose of the review is to enable the Director to decide whether changes are required to improve ORS C5 2021. The review will consider information on the operation, technical accuracy and clarity of the code of practice.

Call for public submissions  

Before reviewing the code of practice, the Director invites public submissions on the review question: 

Are changes required to improve the Code of Practice for the Security of Radioactive Material: ORS C5 2021?

To make a submission, please email ors.codes@health.govt.nz by 5pm, Friday 28 November 2025. It will be helpful if you use the subject line: Submission on the review of ORS C5 2021.

About ORS C5 2021  

ORS C5 2021 was issued under section 86 of the Act. The purpose of the code of practice is to specify the technical requirements that a person who deals with radioactive material must comply with in order to comply with the fundamental requirements for security of radioactive material set out in sections 11 and 12 of the Act. The scope of the code of practice includes the requirements for radioactive material that is in storage or is to be transported. 

The code of practice was issued to be appropriate to the level of risk posed by the radioactive material, its use, and its potential misuse.

The scope of the code of practice is set out in the Code of Practice for the Security of Radioactive Material: ORS C5 2021

After the review is complete

If the review indicates that changes are required to improve ORS C5 2021, a further public consultation on the proposed changes will be conducted. Information on the review’s findings will be published on this webpage following the completion of the review and this information will indicate the ‘next steps’. 

Proposed amendments to commercial fishing regulations

Source: NZ Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

Fisheries New Zealand is seeking feedback on a package of 19 proposed changes, mostly to commercial fishing regulations. Most changes have been proposed by representatives of the commercial fishing industry as a means to remove redundant regulations and regulations that are overly complex, duplicative, or impose unnecessary compliance costs. Fisheries New Zealand has assessed these proposals and is now consulting on those outlined in the consultation document.

Consultation opened on 20 October and we will accept submissions until 5pm on 28 November 2025.

This work is related to the wider fisheries reform work programme. Other work as part of the reform has related to changes to the Fisheries Act 1996. The changes we are consulting on here are related but different, as they focus on changes to the commercial fishing regulations.

Consultation document

Discussion document [PDF, 2.5 MB]

What’s being proposed?

Summary document [PDF, 156 KB]

Making your submission

Email your feedback on options set out in the consultation document by 5pm on 28 November 2025 to FMsubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can post written submissions to:

2025 Fishing regulation amendments
Fisheries Management
Fisheries New Zealand
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140

What to include

Make sure you tell us in your submission:

  • the title of the consultation document
  • the proposals you’re making a submission on
  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

Related document

Fisheries reform work programme – Cabinet paper [PDF, 1.1 MB]

Related consultation

Fisheries reform: proposed amendments to the Fisheries Act

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Inflation remains within target band

Source: New Zealand Government

Acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop has welcomed the latest figures showing inflation remaining within the Reserve Bank’s target range. 

Stats NZ reported today that annual Consumers Price Index (CPI) inflation rose from 2.7 per cent in the year to June to 3 per cent in the year to September 2025.

“This is the quarter in which most economists were expecting inflation to peak so it is pleasing to see it remain within the Reserve Bank’s target range of 1 to 3 per cent. 

“Expectations are that the rate will decline towards 2 per cent in the first half of next year, easing pressure on households and businesses. 

“However, continued discipline will be required by the Government to ensure inflation does not return to the 7.3 per cent peak it reached under the previous government in 2022. 

“Top contributors to the annual increase included electricity – up 11.3 per cent – and local authority rates and payments up 8.8 per cent. 

“Encouragingly, domestic inflation continues to fall. It is down from 3.7 per cent in the June quarter, to 3.5 per cent. This is the lowest rate since mid-2021, and is down from a high of 6.8 per cent in the March quarter of 2023.

“Stats NZ’s update highlights the importance of increasing electricity supply and competition, and the significant impact that local government rates have on New Zealanders’ wallets.”

Pharmac proposes greater transparency for medicine funding decisions

Source: PHARMAC

Pharmac is proposing changes to bring greater transparency and clarity to how medicine funding applications are managed on the Options for Investment (OFI) list.

The approach would allow Pharmac to decline applications that have remained in the lowest-ranked group for more than two years – helping people better understand which medicines are unlikely to be funded and why.

“The OFI list was designed to show which medicines we would consider for funding if our budget allowed,” says Pharmac’s Director Pharmaceuticals, Adrienne Martin. “But some applications have stayed on the list for years, ranked low and therefore unlikely to be funded.

“This isn’t because they’re not important, but because other applications have been assessed as higher priority. In some cases, we’ve funded newer and more effective medicines for the same condition, yet the original application remains on the OFI list.

“We’re proposing a change to make our intentions clearer and provide more clarity for people and clinicians.”

The OFI list includes medicines that have been assessed and recommended for funding by Pharmac’s advisory committees. Applications are ranked using the Factors for Consideration framework, which balances clinical evidence, health need, suitability, and cost-effectiveness.

Under the proposal:

  • Applications in the lowest-ranked group for more than two years would be declined.
  • This would apply to the bottom 20% of applications (if there are more than 100), or the bottom 10% (if fewer than 100).

Declined applications could be reconsidered if new evidence becomes available or the price of the medicine changes. Pharmac cannot disclose where medicines are ranked on the OFI, as it is commercially sensitive.

“We’ve heard from people living with health conditions, and the clinicians who support them, that the OFI list can feel frustrating and uncertain,” says Martin. “People want clarity – even if a medicine won’t be funded – so they can plan accordingly.”

Pharmac is committed to consultation and will not decline any applications without hearing from the public.

“We understand these decisions have a real impact,” says Martin. “That’s why we’re committed to listening before making any changes. We want to be open and honest – even when the decisions are difficult – so people and clinicians can make informed choices.”

Consultation is open until Monday 17 November. Feedback can be sent to: applicationfeedback@pharmac.govt.nz

Motorbike riders urged to take care after several crashes

Source: New Zealand Police

As spring arrives and the weather improves, Police are urging motorcycle riders to use good judgement on the roads, following four crashes in the space of two hours.

“As the country steps out of winter into warmer and lighter months we usually see an uptick of motorcycles on our roads, and unfortunately an increase in motorcycle injuries and crashes,” says Superintendent Steve Greally, Director Road Policing.

Spring often brings inexperienced riders, and people who might have had time off from riding, back onto bikes.

“The consequences of a mistake on a motorbike can be far worse than for other vehicles, which is why we’re urging new and returning riders to take extra care,” Superintendent Greally says.

Spring riding can present its own challenges. Short bouts of rain can make for a combination of wet and dry, and greasy, roads; sunstrike and glare can limit rider vision; and warm temperatures can lead to oil and loose grit.

Police were aware of and monitoring an organised motorcycle run, which went from Whatawhata, through Pirongia, Te Awamutu, Arapuni, Putaruru, and north to Huntly on Saturday.

Within around two hours, Police were notified of four riders coming off their bikes.

At around 11am, a woman came off her motorbike after hitting gravel on Te Pahu Road, sustaining a fractured wrist.

Ten minutes later on the same road, a man came off his bike and was knocked unconscious, and reported having a sore back. The man hadn’t ridden in 30 years.

About 12:20pm, another member of the motorcycle run came off his bike on Arapuni Road. He had been riding in formation, and was pushed onto gravel after going around a slight bend. He suffered a broken arm.

Around 15 minutes, later another man who was riding two abreast came off his bike on Arapuni Road – ambulance assistance was declined.

“We all want to be out on the roads when it’s good weather, but it’s important to get the basics right,” Superintendent Greally says.

“I understand that riding with friends can be a great experience, but it’s not great when the cost is a serious injury or worse.

“We’re reminding riders to take it slow, make sure they’re wearing the right gear and make good decisions,” he says.

New and returning riders are urged to explore resources such as Ride Forever.

ENDS

Issued by the Police Media Centre.

New Zealand’s first sports school will open in Term 1 2026

Source: New Zealand Government

Associate Education Minister David Seymour has today announced that the much-anticipated New Zealand Performance Academy Aotearoa (NZPAA) will open as a charter school for athletes in Term 1 2026.

The school will serve students with serious sporting aspirations, giving them the skills to ignite a professional career, while ensuring they get the academic education all students need.

“Students will no longer have to sacrifice their education in pursuit of sporting dreams, or vice versa,” Mr Seymour says.

“There is absolutely no doubt that if this school was open when I was growing up, I would have been an All Black.

“The academy will initially offer elite football training, leveraging the expertise of the Wellington Phoenix Football Academy, and rugby union training. Other sports will be added over time based on the needs of students.”

The academy will be based at the New Zealand Campus of Innovation and Sport (NZCIS) in Upper Hutt, a state-of-the-art facility designed to support high-performance sports. NZCIS will also partner with the school to provide specialised sports training.

“The school will teach a nationally recognised curriculum and world class-athletic development. For example, students will be taught key skills such as leadership, how to build healthy relationships, how to look after their mental health, and nutrition. Students will also have access to flexible scheduling, personalised support, and top-tier coaching and facilities,” Mr Seymour says. 

“When it comes to education, one size does not fit all.

“Charter schools show education can be different if we let communities bring their ideas to the table.

“These schools have more flexibility in return for strictly measured results.

“The charter school equation is: the same funding as state schools, plus greater flexibility plus stricter accountability for results, equals student success.

“There are more ideas in the communities of New Zealand than there are in the Government. That’s why we open ideas to the wider community, then apply strict performance standards to the best ones.

“It will join the three new charter schools announced last week which will open in Term 1 2026. This takes the total number of charter schools to 15. We expect more new charter schools to be announced before the end of the year, along with the first state schools to convert.   

“I want to thank the Charter School Agency and Authorisation Board for the work they have done getting charters open. They considered 52 applicants for new charter schools. This year they tell me the choices were very difficult. 

“This is just the beginning. I hope to see many more new charter schools opening, and state and state-integrated schools converting to become charter schools.” 
 

Proposed changes to the Plant Export Requirement: MPI Technical Standard: Phytosanitary Certificates

Source: NZ Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is consulting on proposed changes to an existing plant export requirement, the MPI Technical Standard: Phytosanitary Certificates [PDF, 326 KB]

This is part of the ongoing work to strengthen the MPI plant export phytosanitary assurance system.

MPI wants your feedback on the proposed changes to the standard.

This consultation opened on 20 October and we will accept submissions until 5pm on 28 November 2025.

Summary of what is being proposed and why are we making these changes

MPI has reviewed the standard, proposing some changes designed to make it easier for users to follow requirements. They include:

  • amending the flow of information to make it easier to read and find relevant information
  • adding more guidance and detail to the requirements to ensure they are well understood
  • future-proofing the standard as much as possible by broadening terminology
  • requiring exporters (whether requesting the certificates themselves or via another organisation) to register with MPI for access to the electronic certification system. This change aligns with new functionality being introduced in MPI Trade Certification, which will enable enhanced user management and allow exporters to have greater control over who can view and submit requests on their behalf. (Note that this change will not be introduced in ePhyto).

We are proposing these changes to the requirements to offer clarity and provide more guidance. These changes are intended to help industry more efficiently obtain and use phytosanitary certification while still meeting MPI’s requirements. While the standard may look different, the requirements largely remain the same.

Note: these are proposed changes only and are not currently in effect. The requirements outlined in the current version of the MPI Technical Standard: Phytosanitary Certificates (dated 18 November 2020) remain applicable.

Consultation document

Proposed updates to the MPI Plant Export Requirement: MPI Technical Standard: Phytosanitary Certificates [PDF, 702 KB]

Note: due to the number of amendments, the proposed changes to the requirements have not been highlighted in yellow.

Making your submission

Submissions are open until 5pm on 28 November 2025.

You can submit your feedback online or by email.

Online

Complete the submission form – SurveyMonkey

Email

Send your comments to plantassurance@mpi.govt.nz

To help you give feedback, use our submission template [DOCX, 81 KB]

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Richard Wagstaff’s response to the Government on nationwide strikes

Source: NZCTU

This statement was originally published by The Post

The strikes planned by several unions on October 23 represent the biggest day of industrial action in decades. More than a hundred thousand union members spread across many occupations have voted to send a message that they expect their employers to respond properly to the claims they have put forward in negotiations.

These workers include primary and secondary teachers, teacher aids, allied health workers, care and support workers, advisory and knowledge workers, mental health and general nurses, and doctors. Other professions like fire fighters are also taking industrial action.

What these groups all have in common is that they are being confronted with a coordinated and deliberate bargaining strategy from the Public Service Commission and employers. That is to respond with long-term pay offers that are well under inflation. In other words, the employers are insisting that these workers take a pay cut in real terms, not just for this year, but for two or three years.

These disputes are about much more than pay rates. These workers have also raised numerous issues around the quality of service and care, especially around short staffing and resources. This has largely fallen on deaf ears. No meaningful proposal has been made on these issues, which go to the very heart of the disputes.

Taken together, the bargaining position of the employers, which will have been signed off by the Government, represents a downgrading of our public services, our health services, and our education services.

The public sector workforce is highly committed to providing what they were trained as professionals to do – deliver a quality service that supports communities to have a high quality of life. If they accept the paltry offers being put in front of them, they know service quality will suffer, and even more workers will head overseas.

The Government consistently demonstrates they are out of touch with the realities of workers. They have tried to portray the dispute as politically driven by unions – ignoring the fact that it is the workers themselves, not union officials, who have voted overwhelmingly to take this action.

The Prime Minister even falsely claimed that the unions taking action are affiliated to the Labour Party – in reality, none of these unions are affiliated to Labour. He is deliberately spreading misinformation to deflect from his Government’s failure to deliver quality public services.

The concerns over safe staffing, resources, and equipment are all long standing and have been raised year after year. There have been agreements to fix things that have not been honoured. Just a few months ago, these workers had their pay equity claims and settlements severely undermined by the Government, which has had a significant impact on their take home pay.

This Government promised to fix the cost-of-living crisis but are instead cutting wages for hundreds of thousands of public service workers.

The nature of industrial disputes is that reaching a fair settlement will ultimately require agreement between the parties.

The Government argues it can’t afford it to meet the claims. But workers are well aware that the Government found $23 billion over the past two budgets for tax cuts for high income earners, and tax breaks and write offs for landlords, tobacco companies, and businesses.  Workers understand its all about priorities, and that ministers could choose to prioritise the essential services and workers we all depend on.

Previous National-led governments have found ways through industrial disputes in the past. We need to see leadership not politics from this Government.

No one wants to take strike action if it can be reasonably avoided. Workers know there are impacts of strike action – but if there wasn’t no pressure could be brought on employers to change their position.

In fact, these workers have shown extraordinary patience. They have been in bargaining for many months, for some over a year. This simply can’t go on with the meaningless timewasting of employers who keep coming back with effectively the same offers.

It is condescending for the Government to accuse these workers of not caring about the impact of the strike. This workforce is dedicated to these services and fully understand that these disputes are not just about settling collective agreements, but also about protecting the public investment and long-term viability of these services. They are taking a stand for all of us, and we encourage the public to show their support.

We all depend on essential public services that are there when we need them. We need to show that we value these services not just with words, but by addressing the concerns brought to the negotiating table by the people who do the work.