Blog

  • Release: Driver licensing proposal doesn’t put safety first

    Source:

    The Government’s proposal to change driver licensing rules is a mixed bag of sensible and careless.

    “Zero tolerance for alcohol on restricted and learners licence holders regardless of age is necessary for safety. This is a move that will save lives and encourage better behaviour when it comes to alcohol and driving,” Labour acting transport spokesperson Damien O’Connor said.

    “Halving the demerit threshold shows little mercy for those who take to the roads and break the law, also something Labour supports.

    “Unfortunately, that’s where the sensible suggestions end. Batting down a second practical driving test as ‘time consuming and inefficient’ is a flippant way to describe minimum driving standards.

    “Transport Minister Chris Bishop suggesting drivers should be able to jump to their full licence without any other requirements puts passengers and other road users at risk. If the test is going to be scrapped there needs to be a minimum requirement for moving on to a full licence.

    “It’s well documented by the Ministry of Transport that restricted and learner licence holders are more likely to be involved in speed-involved fatal crashes than those with full licences, and are usually young people who are more likely statistically to have risky driving behaviour.

    “According to the AA, 70 people under 25 die on the roads each year. Chris Bishop can’t put this evidence to one side, he needs to put safety first.

    “Labour looks forward to seeing submissions to the Ministry of Transport on this proposal, and making sure scrappy legislation isn’t raced on to our roads,” Damien O’Connor said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • Release: Students struggling as Govt sits on hands

    Source:

    “It is unacceptable that struggling students can’t eat and pay their rent because they can’t access their student loan or allowance,” said Labour’s tertiary spokesperson Shanan Halbert.

    “With unemployment rapidly increasing, Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds and Minister for Universities Shane Reti both should have known that enrolments would increase but failed to ensure that support systems were in place.

    “Students are now halfway through the semester and more than 14,000 have not been paid their student allowance. This is appalling.

    “We said that job cuts to the back office were going to mean more paperwork flowing through to the frontline. Our students are feeling the brunt of this today.

    “With no update in sight about Te Pūkenga and university funding still on the line with no reassurances from either Minister, I worry they’re going to drop the ball on a sector that supports hundreds of thousands into work

    “This is all in addition to a measly increase to the minimum wage which was well below inflation, power bills going up, and student loan interest rates increasing for those overseas.

    “If we want our students to secure jobs, be in good health and have a place to live, we need to ensure our support systems are providing relief to those who need it now to achieve those things,” Shanan Halbert said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • Release: More must be done to stop children going hungry

    Source:

    More children are going hungry and statistics showing children in material hardship continue to get worse.

    “I’m worried about children in this country, who seem to be becoming more and more of an afterthought by the day,” Labour child poverty reduction spokesperson Jan Tinetti said.

    “The Government has reversed the measure Labour put in place to ensure benefits rise with the average wage – which the Children’s Commissioner said at the time was the single best thing a government could do to lift children out of poverty.

    “They are running the school lunch programme into the ground, meaning more children aren’t getting the hot, healthy meal that was sometimes their only one in the day.
    “They’ve squeezed lower-paid Kiwis, by refusing to lift the minimum wage in line with inflation – while at the same time they are failing to tackle cost of living issues like they promised.

    “They cut public services for measly tax cuts, which have been more than offset by their decisions to cut free prescriptions, cut free and half-price public transport, and introduced a rebate scheme for childcare that isn’t delivering what was promised.

    “Just this week, Nicola Willis wouldn’t commit to not cutting the best start payment, which helps out new parents and the winter energy payment which helps families heat their homes in winter.

    “The Government must prioritise investment in children and stop making cuts that make families’ lives harder,” Jan Tinetti said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • Release: Longer wait for treatment under National

    Source:

    New Zealanders have waited longer to get an appointment with a specialist and to get elective surgery under the National Government.

    Health data released today shows the Government is failing to ensure New Zealanders can get hospital treatment when they need it.

    “National’s chaotic job cuts and underfunding have taken waitlists backwards and New Zealanders’ health will suffer for it,” Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said.

    In Q1 2023/2024, 67 percent of patients saw a specialist for a first appointment in less than four months. This latest data from October through to the end of December last year showed only 60 percent got an appointment within four months – a drop of 7 percent.

    “You’ll also be waiting longer for elective surgeries – so if you need a hip replaced, or a gynaecological procedure, be prepared.”

    In mid 2023, 62.1% of patients got their surgery within four months. At the end of 2024, that number was down to 59.2%.

    Reducing elective surgery waitlists and waiting times for first specialist appointments are targets the Government set itself.

    “Hospitals will continue to struggle to meet demand unless we get the basics right; like being able to see a doctor in the community,” Ayesha Verrall said. 

    “But even that statistic is going backwards – the number of people enrolled with a GP is down 2 per cent for the same period in the previous year to 94.7%.

    “The family doctor or GP is often the first port of call when you are sick or need other kinds of health care. But 5 per cent of New Zealanders aren’t registered with one, and even if they are, it’s hard to get an appointment.

    “That puts pressure on our emergency departments and after hours services, and ultimately our entire hospital system.

    “By underfunding GPs the National Government is just kicking the can down the road for many New Zealanders who will get sicker or need more urgent care without being able to see a doctor in the community,” Ayesha Verrall said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • Chris Hipkins speech: Treaty Principles Bill second reading

    Source:

    This is a grubby little bill, born of a grubby little deal.

    It has had a colossal impact on the fabric of our nation, and this bill will forever be a stain on our country. What I do take pride in is the way New Zealanders have come together over the last six months to say, loud and clear, “This is not us; this is not Aotearoa New Zealand.”

    For 185 years, Māori and non-Māori have worked together to make progress. We honour those who have come before. We stand on their shoulders today.

    When I say “we”, I mean those on this side of the House: Labour, Te Pāti Māori, the Green Party – united in our determination, throughout this debate, to defeat this bill, to end the division that it has created, and to bring this country together.

    Today, National and New Zealand First join the opposition to this bill, but they can claim no victory, no virtue, and no principle.

    They get no credit for finally starting to fight the fire they helped to ignite.

    Today, their votes will fall on the right side of the ledger, but they will forever be on the wrong side of history when it comes to this bill. Not one National MP should walk out of this debating chamber today with their head held high, because when it comes to this debate, they led nothing, they stopped nothing, and they stood for nothing.

    Unlike the 300,000 New Zealanders who stood up to be counted when it comes to this bill. All those who marched in the streets together: Māori, non-Māori, ethnic communities, young and old, saying, “This is not New Zealand, and this will not define who we are as a country.”

    This is a bill based on a mythology. A mythology that is far too easily turned into outright lies – the myth of Māori special privilege.

    • Life expectancy seven years lower than for other New Zealanders is not special privilege.
    • Being twice as likely to die from cancer as others is not special privilege.
    • A higher rate of childhood hospitalisation,  
    • And 40 percent of Māori living in the highest areas of deprivation compared to just 10 percent of Europeans – these are not signs of privilege.

    But too often these statistics are twisted to suggest that Māori are wanting the Crown to save them. I’ve been up and down the country in recent years speaking to Māori all over New Zealand, and that could not be further from the truth.

    How ignorant, how blind, and how wrong those statements are.

    Māori have been very clear: what they’re asking for is partnership, for the Crown to walk alongside them and to embrace by-Māori, for-Māori solutions. Māori want to do the mahi themselves, and they want the Crown to stop acting as an impediment to that. I say it’s time we listened and it’s time we acted on that.

    When it comes to Māori politics and politicians, I have found that there are two approaches in common, and I spoke about these before the last election: Playing the race card, spreading the myth of Māori special privilege, talking about one law for all, and playing on people’s fears; but on the other side is the middle ground, keeping quiet and, too often, watering down policy so as not to be seen as too pro-Māori.

    I said before the election, and I’ll say it again today: I reject both of those approaches, because when Māori thrive in New Zealand, all of us benefit, all of us will thrive, and non-Māori have nothing to fear from Māori getting ahead here in New Zealand.

    Once again, I say to the members opposite in the National Party, where are the voices like Christopher Finlayson, Doug Graham, Jim Bolger, Jenny Shipley, John Key, Bill English, who were proud of the Treaty partnership, who embraced concepts like co-governance, and they didn’t call it divisive.

    Our work in Government, which has been the subject of much debate on that side of the House, actually built on the foundations that were set by successive Governments – both Labour and National.

    It is that history of progress that today’s National Party have turned their backs against.

    In my lifetime, we have changed as a nation for the better—from one that punished kids for speaking te reo Māori to one that embraces te reo Māori in all of our classrooms.

    From one that ignored our history, to one that teaches all of our kids in all of our schools Aotearoa New Zealand’s history.

    From one that turned a blind eye to the wrongs of the past to one that makes amends and commits not to repeating the same mistakes again. Until today, that is.

    Christopher Luxon called Te Tiriti o Waitangi “a little experiment”. Winston Peters claims that Māori are not indigenous to Aotearoa. In fact, as I was re-reading my notes from before the election, I was reminded of a quote by a New Zealand First candidate in this most recent election campaign, which I’m going to quote directly from: “Cry if you want to, we don’t care. You pushed it too far. We are the party with the cultural mandate and the courage to cut out your disease and bury you permanently.” That was a New Zealand First candidate speaking about Māori in New Zealand.

    It made me sick to my stomach then, and it still does now, because te Tiriti is not “a little experiment”; it is a bold promise and a bold vision.

    It is not a source of division, it is what binds us together.

    Yes, it is a partnership, a structure, something to work towards, a promise to uphold, because when Māori thrive, all of Aotearoa New Zealand thrives.

    Over 185 years, we’ve worked together to fulfil the promise of te Tiriti—the good and the bad—and there has been far too much bad in that work. We have discussed, debated, and argued about the meaning of te Tiriti. We’ve argued about what the visionary rangatira who signed it had intended. That 185 years of history, of debate, of discussion, of argument, of progress, informs how we interpret te Tiriti today, and no member of this House simply gets to wipe all of that 185 years of history away to suit their own purposes.

    The Treaty of Waitangi is not just history, it’s not just ink on paper, it’s a living promise.

    Today, on this side of the House, we honour that promise. We commit to continuing to strive to do better, to bring people together, to move our nation forward.

    We must work together for the wellbeing of all, work together in partnership.

    Coming together does not mean being the same. It does not mean thinking the same. It does not mean acting the same. It means embracing our differences but working together to find common ground so that we can all move forward together.

    So let’s finally consign this grubby little bill to the scrapheap of history, where it can take its place alongside the other darker acts of this House that have also been consigned to our history.

    Let’s instead move forward together. Let’s find a positive, lighter path, where we can bring the country together, where we cannot play on prejudice but seek to reconcile our differences, where we can celebrate our history—the positives of it—and recognise the ugly parts for what they were and commit to doing better.

    This debate has not been helpful for the fabric of Aotearoa New Zealand. It is well and truly time for it to be over.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • Release: End to the Treaty Principles Bill, but challenges remain ahead for Aotearoa

    Source:

    Ka mate te pire I te rā nei
    The bill dies today

    Engari ka kakati tonu te namu I te whārangi o te pukapuka
    But the sandfly continues to nip at Te Tiriti o Waitangi

    Ka ora tonu te hoariri!
    The enemy still lives!

    This whakataukī penned by Labour MP Peeni Henare reflects what it means for the Treaty Principles Bill to be voted down today.

    “While this Bill was officially defeated in Parliament today, it was defeated in the hearts and minds of people long before today,” Chris Hipkins said.

    “We saw more than 300,000 submissions, thousands marching in the streets with volunteers all over the country providing water, shade or a seat to rest tired feet. We saw whānau holding writing workshops in their marae, churches, community halls, parents teaching their tamariki and kaumātua raising flags with trembling hands.

    “These are the people we thank today. Our work on progress for Māori, and for all New Zealand does not stop here. While this grubby little bill goes no further, it shows how much more work we still have to do,” Chris Hipkins said.

    Willie Jackson pointed out that Prime Minister Christopher Luxon did not turn up for the debate, and National’s Crown-Māori Relations Minister did not speak.

    “That weak, spineless Prime Minister used Te Tiriti o Waitangi as a bargaining chip during his coalition negotiations and then failed to turn up again and again to front the damage and division he has caused,” Willie Jackson said.

    “Our people have had to stand up, speak out and submit against this Bill because of him, but he hasn’t even bothered to be here. And the one Minister in that Cabinet whose job it is to stand up for Māori didn’t even speak. This Government is a disgrace.”


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • Release: Bill to make trading laws fairer passes first hurdle

    Source:

    Labour MP Kieran McAnulty’s Members Bill to make the law simpler and fairer for businesses operating on Easter, Anzac and Christmas Days has passed its first reading after a conscience vote in Parliament.

    “This Bill is about the sale and supply of alcohol – and that’s it. It only focuses on businesses that can already open and workers that will already be working. It will allow bars, restaurants, and supermarkets to serve or sell alcohol as they would any other day of the year,” Kieran McAnulty said.

    “The current law is confusing. At Easter for example you can purchase alcohol at the pub down the road on Thursday, but not Friday unless you have a meal as well, then you can buy a pint or two again on Saturday, but not Sunday again unless you have a meal. And its unfortunately hospitality workers who have to monitor this – which can sometimes be difficult – as well as doing their usual jobs.  

    “RSAs should be able to serve veterans the traditional rum and coffee on Anzac Day morning without having to apply for a special license.

    “There isn’t any good reason why the law is this way, except that it’s always been that way. That’s not a very good reason to have a law.

    “It’s time to simplify it, take the onus off businesses to interpret how they can or can’t serve their customers and make hospitality workers’ lives a little easier.

    “This Bill is different to previous ones like it because it only looks at liquor licensing rules – not labour laws or trading laws. It won’t mean people have to work on their otherwise guaranteed days off.

    “It allows businesses that would’ve opened anyway to serve their customers a drink,” Kieran McAnulty said.


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

  • E tū welcomes defeat of Treaty Principles Bill – E tū

    E tū welcomes defeat of Treaty Principles Bill – E tū

    Source:

    E tū, New Zealand’s largest private sector union, welcomes the overwhelming defeat of the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill in Parliament yesterday. The bill, which sought to redefine the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, was rejected by 112 votes to 11.​

    E tū President Muriel Tunoho expressed immense pride in the union’s active opposition to the bill:​

    “I am extremely proud that E tū took a stand and made submissions to oppose the Treaty of Waitangi Principles Bill too. Thank you all for playing your part in this incredible fightback.​

    “It was right to finally see the bill consigned to the past and into the bin. The results show that this is not us.​

    “We don’t need to rewrite or re-define the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. We just have to live them!”​

    E tū National Secretary Rachel Mackintosh highlighted the bill’s potential to undermine the foundational agreement between Māori and the Crown:​

    “This bill sought to fundamentally alter the meaning of Te Tiriti o Waitangi by selectively and incorrectly interpreting the reo Māori text. It tried to undermine the separation of powers under the rule of law by using the power of Parliament to change Aotearoa New Zealand’s constitutional foundation, all based on a legal and historical fiction.​

    “This bill has done damage. It has given airtime to false and racist ideas.​

    “It also galvanised hundreds of thousands of people to stand up – toitū Te Tiriti. More than 90% of the submissions on the bill called for it to be abandoned. E tū and thousands of our members were among the voices in those submissions. The submissions stood up for the truth of Te Tiriti as the foundation on which we can build a society where tāngata whenua and tau iwi take care of each other.​

    “Now that Parliament has voted it down, we can start to repair the damage and to build an Aotearoa where we honour Te Tiriti and respect each other.”​

    E tū remains committed to upholding the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and advocating for a just and inclusive society.

  • Public Defence Service to consult staff on proposed changes

    Source: Tertiary Education Commission

    Headline: Public Defence Service to consult staff on proposed changes

    5:00pm – 3 April 2025

    Proposed changes for the Public Defence Service (PDS) are designed to increase case volumes, boost access to the service and contribute to court timeliness.

    “The PDS are a highly professional group of dedicated, hard-working people, focused on ensuring clients receive high quality legal services,” says Director, Public Defence Service Peter Hutchinson.

    “We have been reviewing our operating model to ensure that we are meeting our current performance expectations as well as achieving timeliness for the criminal justice system. A significant way in which we can do this is by being able to take more legal aid cases, within our current volume settings, from the 2025-26 financial year onward.”

    “To achieve this within our current budget, we need to make changes to how the PDS operates and prioritises work, and to its organisational structure,” Mr Hutchinson says.

    Today, a Proposal for Organisational Realignment was sent to PDS staff for consideration and feedback.

    Under the proposal 25 roles would be disestablished, with 22 of these either support or management roles.

    Twelve new roles are proposed to be established. Depending on final decisions made after consultation with staff, PDS would also look to establish a further 12 new lawyer positions.

    Once the new lawyer positions have been established, there would be a net overall reduction of one position.

    The delivery model for legal support services would also change, with the establishment of two legal support hubs – one in Manukau and one in Wellington.

    It is proposed that the PDS reduce the size of the current standalone Appeals Team, with a corresponding decrease in the number of Court of Appeal and Supreme Court cases that the PDS can accept each year.

    PDS lawyers with the required Appellate listing would still represent clients at appeals.

    The proposal also seeks to improve the delivery, alignment and national consistency of the duty lawyer service.

    The consultation period closes at 5:00pm on Thursday 24 April 2025.

    “Our proposed reprioritisation, combined with the hiring of more lawyers is designed to help boost the number of PDS lawyers able to take legal aid cases,” Mr Hutchinson says.

    “We will not be making any decisions until we have carefully considered all feedback from our staff. We appreciate that this is an unsettling time, and appropriate support is being offered.”

    About the Public Defence Service

    • The Public Defence Service (PDS) is an independent criminal law practice providing advice and representation to defendants who have legal aid in criminal cases.
    • The PDS also oversees the duty lawyer services in the courts where it operates.
    • The PDS is the largest criminal law practice in New Zealand, with over 150 criminal defence lawyers in 10 offices across New Zealand.

     

    ENDS

    ← Back to the news

  • Ministry to undertake seismic strengthening work at Nelson Courthouse

    Source: Tertiary Education Commission

    Headline: Ministry to undertake seismic strengthening work at Nelson Courthouse

    Nelson Courthouse is being vacated for up to three to four months from Sunday (February 23) for seismic strengthening, prompting changes to the way court services are delivered in the region.

    The findings of an Initial Seismic Assessment, received by the Ministry of Justice in recent days, assessed the Nelson Courthouse as being at 15 percent of New Building Standard (NBS).

    While engineers found the courthouse could continue to be occupied, the connection between the original courthouse and a building extension added in 2007 was a safety concern.

    On that basis, the Ministry believes it is prudent to vacate the entire complex while remediation work is carried out.

    “Our plan is to complete the remediation work as quickly and as safely as possible to enable normal operations at the courthouse to resume,” Ministry of Justice chief operating officer Carl Crafar says.

    Addressing this potential critical structural weakness will improve the building’s performance in the event of a significant earthquake.

    “Protecting the safety of everyone who spends time in the building – including members of the public, the judiciary and staff is our highest priority,” Mr Crafar says.

    The Ministry is already in detailed planning to minimise the impact on court operations.

    “Some scheduled court events will continue virtually while some other events may need to be rescheduled. Anyone who is expected to attend court during the remediation work period should await instruction from court officials,” Mr Crafar says.

    An update on when the courthouse will reopen to the public will be made in due course.

    ← Back to the news