Qualification and programme eligibility – final-year Fees Free

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

On this page:

Only qualifications and programmes at Levels 3 and above on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF) are eligible. Eligible qualifications and programmes must be recognised by the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) or Universities New Zealand and funded by the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) from:

the Delivery at Levels 3–7 (non-degree) on the NZQCF and all industry training Fund (DQ3-7), or
the Delivery at Levels 7 (degree) to 10 on the NZQCF Fund (DQ7-10), or
grants under section 556 of the Education and Training Act 2020 for tertiary provision towards a qualification on the NZQCF at Levels 3 or above.

Provider-based qualifications
Eligible provider-based qualifications are TEC-funded and are equal to or greater than 0.5 equivalent full-time students (EFTS).
Work-based programmes
Eligible work-based programmes are TEC-funded programmes comprising at least 120 credits.
Qualifications and programmes that are not eligible for final-year Fees Free
The following are not eligible for final-year Fees Free:

school learning programmes and secondary tertiary programmes
certificates of proficiency
pathway qualifications
zero fee programmes
qualifications funded through the Youth Guarantee (YG) Fund, Māori and Pasifika Trades Training (MPTT), or the Refugee English Funds 
qualifications and programmes at Levels 1 or 2 on the NZQCF
provider-based qualifications that are less than 0.5 EFTS, or work-based programmes that are less than 120 credits.

Pathway qualifications
Pathway qualifications are qualifications that prepare learners to progress into further study and training by supporting them to meet minimum entry requirements and/or to develop the required skills for higher study. For the purposes of final-year Fees Free, this includes:

bridging qualifications, Certificates of University Preparation, Certificates in Study and Employment Pathways, and Level 3 Study and Career Preparation (except when primarily intended for career preparation).

Qualifications focussed mainly on subject-specific content, such as arts or science, and are mostly cross-credited towards a higher qualification are unlikely to be a pathway qualification.
Any qualification confirmed as a pathway qualification will be excluded for all learners. The exclusion is not able to take into account individual learner intentions.
View the list of pathway qualifications that are excluded from Fees Free:
Pathway qualifications (XLSX 26 KB)
To request to add or remove a qualification from the list of pathway qualifications excluded from Fees Free, contact customerservice@tec.govt.nz with the subject: (EDUMIS number) Final-year Fees Free – pathway qualifications. Please briefly outline how the qualification you wish to add/remove from the list does/doesn’t meet the definition of a pathway qualification.
Qualification completion date
The qualification completion date is defined as the date the learner has met the requirements to be awarded the qualification (whether an eligible provider-based qualification or work-based programme). This should align with what is recorded on the learner’s New Zealand Record of Achievement.
For provider-based study, TEOs must submit the qualification completion date as part of their SDR submission from August 2025.
TEOs already report work-based programme completion dates to NZQA, which NZQA provide to TEC.
Qualification and programme eligibility FAQs
Why must provider-based qualifications comprise at least 0.5 EFTS and work-based programmes at least 120 credits to be eligible?
Setting a minimum threshold mitigates the risk of learners using their Fees Free entitlement on small pieces of study or training. For example, a learner will not be able to unknowingly consume their entitlement on a very short programme of 0.2 EFTS.
Setting the eligibility criteria for provider-based qualifications at 0.5 EFTS or greater means that the large number of learners who complete qualifications at this level, and don’t go on to do further study or training, can access final-year Fees Free.
A work-based programme minimum of 120 credits gives assurance that the training programme has career benefit for the learner. It reduces the risk that learners will either use up their Fees Free entitlement on short training programmes directed by (and often entirely paid for by) their employers, or that employers will shift training costs onto learners.
Why aren’t Level 1 and 2 qualifications covered by Fees Free?
The Fees Free policy aligns eligibility with student support and government tuition subsidies.
Foundation programmes and qualifications (at NZQCF Levels 1 and 2) are excluded because provider-based Level 1 and 2 study is already fees-free, and learners shouldn’t have to use their Fees Free entitlement on courses and programmes intended to prepare them for tertiary education at Levels 3 and above.
Why do programmes and courses have to be recognised and funded to be available for Fees Free?
Fees Free was designed to help New Zealanders access high-quality tertiary education that provides skills for life and work. When a course or programme is both recognised by the NZQA or Universities New Zealand, and funded by the TEC, it means the course is of a high educational standard.
Are private training establishment (PTE) courses covered by Fees Free?
Yes, as long as the provider-based qualification or work-based programme meets the eligibility criteria.
What happens if a learner is enrolled in two qualifications at the same time?
For provider-based study, a learner enrolled in two qualifications at the same time will only receive Fees Free on completion of their first qualification. We’ll use the qualification completion date reported by TEOs to determine the first completed qualification.
For work-based learning, eligibility is based on the learner’s first programme completion (apprenticeship or training programme) rather than the qualifications that make up that programme, many of which will be under the 120-credit minimum.

Implementation – final-year Fees Free

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

On this page:

Claiming Fees Free entitlement
From 2026, after completing their first eligible provider-based qualification or work-based programme, learners will log in to myIR to confirm their eligibility (ie, if they meet the criteria), and claim their final-year Fees Free entitlement.
Learners have 12 months to claim their entitlement once they have completed their qualification or programme. Learners that complete their first qualification in 2025, before the claim process is available, will have until the end of 2026 to claim their entitlement.
Learners need to organise payment of their fees as required by their tertiary education organisation (TEO). TEOs will not receive Fees Free payments from the tertiary education commission (TEC) or Inland Revenue (IR) on behalf of eligible learners under the final-year Fees Free policy.
Roles of agencies
The Ministry of Education leads the policy work for final-year Fees Free. The TEC and IR lead the implementation work. 
TEC is responsible for collecting learner enrolment and qualification completion data from TEOs. TEC will determine qualification/programme eligibility, calculate entitlement for learners, and provide data to IR to support identity matching and the assessment of learner eligibility. TEC will continue to hold the relationship with TEOs with regards to Fees Free.
IR is responsible for assessing learner eligibility and paying entitlement to eligible learners. IR will provide support to learners through their customer service channels.
Data collection
To support the final-year Fees Free policy, TEOs will need to submit learner fee and provider-based qualification completion data. To reduce ongoing administrative burden for TEOs, we plan to collect this data using the Single Data Return (SDR) and Industry Training Register (ITR) collection processes on DXP Ngā Kete, instead of the separate monthly reporting templates used for the first-year Fees Free scheme. However, this will require system changes to the SDR/ITR and to student/trainee management systems, to ensure we collect the data required.
With the Data System Refresh (DSR) programme already underway, we are integrating the data collection requirements for final-year Fees Free into the existing DSR specifications. 
Provider-based data changes will be integrated into the data specifications for SDR in May 2025. Fees Free data submissions will be required for the first time in the August 2025 SDR.

Work-based data changes are expected to be integrated into the work-based data specifications in December 2024. Fees Free data submissions will be required for the first time from July 2025.

Identity matching
We’re asking TEOs to collect and report learner IRD numbers to TEC to enable effective and efficient data matching across agencies and to support the payment of Fees Free entitlement payments by IR. A learner’s IRD number will be used alongside their NSN and date of birth to confirm their identity and help confirm their eligibility.
We are undertaking a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the collection of IRD numbers by TEOs, and the Ministry of Education has provided a summary of the initial PIA to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
We will provide TEOs with advice on collection, retention and deletion of IRD numbers.
Implementation FAQs
If an employer pays for a learner’s fees, can the employer claim the entitlement when the learner completes their qualification?
IR will only be making payments directly to learners – either offsetting their loan balance by the relevant amount for learners with loans or paying the learner’s entitlement into a nominated bank account.
The final-year Fees Free policy is about rewarding learners for completing their tertiary study or training. Paying Fees Free entitlement to employers does not align with this. It would also add significant administrative complexity and cost which does not align with the Government’s overall focus on improving the effectiveness, efficiency and responsiveness of public services.
Employers and learners will need to agree on how they will manage situations where the employer pays the fees. Employers may wish to adapt employment practices and contracts as necessary.
Are there tax implications for learners receiving the entitlement?
Fees Free entitlement paid to the learner will not be considered income for tax purposes.
There are tax implications if an employer has paid a learner’s fees and claimed them as an expense, and the learner agrees to repay the employer the Fees Free entitlement. Once the employer receives the payment from the learner, the amount will be taxable to the employer.  
Will statutory declarations still be used to confirm eligibility?
No. Learners will need to declare that they meet eligibility criteria when they apply for their Fees Free entitlement via myIR. They will be asked to provide relevant information and confirm that the information is true and correct as part of this process.
While creating the proposed implementation design, we considered the barriers that statutory declarations create for some learners and opted for an application process that could be completed digitally to reduce administrative complexity for learners and agencies.
Will TEOs be able to check a learner’s eligibility?
No, TEOs will not be able to check a learner’s eligibility.
Learners will be able to work through the eligibility criteria and determine if they think they meet them. In 2025, we aim to provide a tool for learners to self-assess their eligibility against the full criteria.
However, learners won’t be able to confirm their eligibility using their NSN until after they have completed their qualification or programme, and the TEC will not be providing a list of the eligible learners by NSN to TEOs. This is because we won’t know whether the learner is eligible or not until they complete their qualification or programme, and they may need to submit additional information to IR to confirm eligibility.
We will provide TEOs with as much information as possible on entitlement settings and programme eligibility so they can help learners understand their entitlement.
What happens if the learner hasn’t paid their fees to the TEO?
TEOs will be responsible for ensuring that learners pay their fees and for recovering any debt the learner has. Fees Free entitlement will not be paid to the TEO where the learner has not paid their fees.
There is no intention to include a reporting field for TEOs to record whether fees have been paid in full, or to provide this information to IR.
How soon after completion will learners receive their entitlement?
We will be ready to start making payments in early 2026, including payments for eligible learners who completed their qualification in 2025. A learner can apply for their entitlement at any time, but the frequency of payments is yet to be confirmed, as they rely on the frequency of data collection.

Renew your Maritime Transport Operator Certificate – we’re making it simple

Source: Maritime New Zealand

Maritime NZ knows many Maritime Transport Operator Certificates (MTOCs) expire this year and we want to help. We’re making renewal straightforward so it’s easy for you.

Six months before your MTOC expires, we’ll send you everything you need to renew it – to avoid delays, please then apply as soon as you can. Don’t wait.

It’s important to apply before your MTOC expires because we can’t renew an expired MTOC. Applying for a new one is a much longer process which includes a site visit. You would also be unable to operate until we issue a new MTOC. We don’t want that to happen.

If you haven’t applied within three months of our email, we’ll send you a reminder but it’s best to not wait.

We want to help your application go smoothly. If you have any questions, need assistance, or think you might have missed your six-month email, please:

  • talk to your maritime officer
  • email [email protected]
  • phone, toll-free, 0508 22 55 22 (press 1 from the menu)

see our MTOC page.

Have your say about major changes to vessel design, construction and equipment rules

Source: Maritime New Zealand

Maritime NZ is proposing important changes to the Maritime Rules for vessel design, construction and equipment. These rules (sometimes known as the ‘40-Series’) are well over 20 years old and are in need of reform.

The proposed changes are being consulted on as packages, each including four proposed new Rule Parts and the associated maritime transport instruments (MTIs). In total, 15 existing Rule Parts will be reformed through this programme. The proposed new rules and MTIs will come into force at the same time, after all changes have been consulted on.

Maritime NZ consulted on the first package of proposals towards the end of 2024. Consultation on package two is now open. The proposed changes in package two relate to:

  • stability, drainage, freeboard, and subdivision
  • watertight and weathertight
  • electrical, and
  • radio equipment.

“Consultation is your chance to tell us what you think, and help to influence the new rules. The proposals in this consultation aren’t a done-deal,” says Peter Brunt, Maritime NZ’s Deputy Chief Executive, Regulatory Frameworks. 

“In particular, we really want to hear how you think the new stability rules should apply to existing vessels. We want to understand the costs and practical implications of the different options.”

The proposals have been developed with extensive input from people working in the sector, and now everyone will be able to see what they look like.

A snapshot of the proposed changes sits alongside the ‘Invitation to Comment’ and drafts of the new rules on our consultation webpage. You can use this information to help you to comment on the proposals by Friday, 11 July 2025.

If you have questions or need help, please email [email protected].

Your notifications matter — use our online form

Source: Maritime New Zealand

We appreciate the proactive approach many people take to safety and reporting incidents to Maritime NZ. Lately, we’ve noticed that some people are preferring to call our staff directly to notify them of incidents.

While we understand the urgency, the way to report is through our online incident notification form – easily accessible via the red button on our homepage.

Using our main contact channels ensures you get any immediate assistance you need, as they’re always monitored during business hours and have after-hours support in place. This helps you to avoid delays that can happen when reaching out directly to someone who might not be working. Also, giving Maritime NZ staff uninterrupted breaks from work is important for their health and wellbeing.

When in doubt, fill it out

If it’s crossed your mind to contact us, it’s worth submitting a notification. Not sure if it’s notifiable? Submit it via the form and we’ll review it.

Our team will pick up your report quickly, assess its urgency, and ensure it reaches the right people. Urgent incidents are promptly escalated to the right frontline manager who will contact you to discuss any immediate steps needed (such as scene hold decisions).

Even if no further action is needed, every notification helps our harm prevention teams identify trends and improve safety across the maritime sector.

After hours serious event?

On weekends, New Zealand public holidays and on weekdays between 4:30pm and 9am NZT call 0508 22 55 22 to notify us about an actual or potential loss of life, serious injury, serious damage to a vessel or port, or serious pollution.

This will connect you with our out of hours call centre service, which will put you in contact with an experienced Maritime NZ staff member.

For an emergency response if you’re facing a life-threatening situation and require emergency services, call 111 immediately or radio a MAYDAY on VHF Channel 16.

Interim emergency ocean response capability for Cook Strait announced

Source: Maritime New Zealand

There was good news for safety in the Cook Strait on 17 April when Minister of Transport Chris Bishop announced that the Government is considering next steps on developing an emergency ocean response capability and has contracted anchor handling tug supply vessel – the MMA Vision – to provide assurance in the meantime.

The MMA Vision, owned by MMA Offshore and currently on charter to support offshore activity in Taranaki, has assisted in previous incidents such as last year’s Manahau grounding on the West Coast, when it successfully pulled the barge off the beach and towed it to Tasman Bay.

The agreement between Maritime NZ, MMA and the vessel charterer currently runs until July 2026 and will provide additional maritime safety and response capabilities for New Zealand and, in particular, Cook Strait. The vessel will be stationed in the vicinity of Wellington Harbour or the Marlborough Sounds when not engaged in its primary operational activity in Taranaki.

Cook Strait is a vital maritime route between Wellington and Picton, known for its challenging conditions and high volume of marine traffic. The availability of the MMA Vision will reduce potential risk for passengers and vessels crossing the Strait.

At the same time, the Government has decided to continue to explore procuring an enduring emergency ocean response capability, on a predominantly user-pays basis.

“We are interested in testing the willingness of users (public and industry) to pay a levy to fund a permanent response capability. I have instructed officials to provide me with advice on the most effective approach and expect to hear back in the middle of the year,” Minister Bishop said in the 17 April statement.

Port State Control inspection campaign promotes fair crew conditions at sea

Source: Maritime New Zealand

New Zealand recently led an inspection campaign to assess seafarers’ employment conditions on board ships of various flag states subject to Port State Control. The campaign was a collaboration between both the Tokyo and Paris Memoranda of Understanding, with Maritime NZ staff participating throughout.

The memoranda focus on eliminating substandard shipping, enhancing maritime safety, protecting the marine environment, and ensuring good working and living conditions on ships.

The campaign was conducted from September to November 2024 and focused on crew wages and employment agreements in line with the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) 2006.

During the three-month period, 8,134 inspections were carried out, with 6,580 specifically addressing the campaign’s focus areas that promote fair treatment and enhance the welfare of seafarers globally. The campaign resulted in 297 ship detentions, including 20 directly related to MLC violations, accounting for 7% of all detentions.

Common deficiencies included the absence of signed seafarer employment agreements (16%) and seafarers being unable to access information about their employment conditions on board (28%).

Ships from Panama, Liberia, and the Marshall Islands were most frequently inspected – 39% of the total. Some ships from Panama, Liberia, Mongolia, and Gambia were detained more than once.

A comprehensive report detailing the findings will be published later this year.

Agenda for June 2025 Rare Disorders Advisory Committee meeting

Source: PHARMAC

Pharmac is sharing the agenda for the upcoming Rare Disorders Advisory Committee meeting to be held on Tuesday 10 June 2025.

Note the meeting date is now one day earlier than the date originally shared. This is to accommodate advisor availability. 

What we’re doing

Pharmac is sharing what medicine applications will be considered at the Rare Disorders Advisory Committee meeting on Tuesday 10 June 2025.

We understand that people living with rare disorders face many challenges, including access to health care and effective medicines. Sharing the Rare Disorders Advisory Committee meeting agenda offers more transparency to those looking for updates on specific medicines.

The agenda for the meeting includes applications for treatments for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH), hereditary angioedema (HAE), Fabry disease, and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). It also includes a review of recent evidence for miglustat for Neimann Pick Type C.

The records from the Rare Disorders Advisory Committee meeting will be released later in the year. Funding applications will be reviewed using the Rare Disorders policy principles and will be assessed in line with Pharmac’s usual processes

We are working with the consumer group Rare Disorders New Zealand(external link) to make sure the right voices are heard at this meeting – we thank them for their time and expertise.

Applications

Pegunigalsidase alfa-iwxy for Fabry Disease

The Committee will discuss a new application for an Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) for people with Fabry disease. Fabry disease is a neurological condition that can affect many parts of the body, including the kidneys, heart, and skin.

Pegunigalsidase alfa-iwxy (branded as Elfabrio) is another treatment option for this condition.  The Committee had previously recommended funding of agalsidase alfa, agalsidase beta and migalastat for Fabry disease.

Application for pegunigalsidase alfa-iwxj for Fabry disease(external link)

Previous considerations of agalsidase alfa(external link), agalsidase beta(external link) and migalastat(external link) for Fabry disease.

Onasemnogene abeparvovec for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), pre-symptomatic or type 1

The Committee will rediscuss an application for onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of pre-symptomatic or type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). SMA is a genetic disorder that causes muscle weakness and wasting due to the loss of nerve cells in the spinal cord.

Previously the Rare Disorders Advisory Committee deferred making a recommendation for onasemnogene abeparvovec, seeking long-term evidence on its efficacy and safety. The Committee will consider the latest data now available.

Application for onasemnogene abeparvovec for SMA(external link)

Garadacimab for hereditary angioedema (HAE)

The Committee will discuss a new application for people with hereditary angioedema (HAE). HAE is an inherited disorder that results in recurrent episodes of severe swelling (angioedema).

The Committee had previously recommended funding of another treatment for HAE, lanadelumab.

Application for garadacimab for HAE(external link)

Previous application for lanadelumab(external link)

Iptacopan, Eculizumab, and Crovalimab for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH)

The Committee will discuss three applications for treatments for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) – iptacopan, eculizumab, and crovalimab.  PNH is a rare blood disorder in which red blood cells break apart prematurely. This can lead to anaemia, blood clots and other complications.

Pharmac has previously assessed eculizumab for PNH on several occasions. This is a new application which the Committee will consider in the context of rare disorders.

Application for iptacopan for PNH(external link)

New application for eculizumab for PNH(external link)

Previous considerations of eculizumab for PNH(external link)

Application for crovalimab for PNH(external link)

Matters Arising

Miglustat for Neimann Pick Type C

The Committee previously assessed miglustat for Neimann Pick Type C. New evidence was provided by a clinician, and so the Committee will consider if this changes their previous recommendation.

Previous consideration of Niemann Pick Type C(external link)

Advisory meeting agenda setting

The scheduling and agenda setting process for advisory meetings considers multiple factors. We aim to balance the relative priorities of:

  • clinical advice needed across indications
  • the factors for consideration for each application (for example unmet health need)
  • the time since applications were received
  • the internal and advisor resource available to support each meeting.

Applications received through the rare disorders call for applications that are not included on this agenda will be considered as soon as practicable via the most appropriate Advisory Committee for the application.

Pharmac Board Chair welcomes organisational culture report

Source: PHARMAC

An independent review has found that Pharmac needs to make significant organisational changes over the next five years to meet public and stakeholders’ expectations.

Pharmac’s Board commissioned organisational expert Debbie Francis to undertake a review at the end of last year. Board Chair Paula Bennett has welcomed the review’s findings and thanked Pharmac staff and external stakeholders for taking part, and Debbie Francis for her expertise.

“Pharmac is full of committed, passionate people and we wanted to understand what a positive organisational culture could look like in five years, and how to achieve that,” she says.

“This review, along with the feedback from the two consumer engagement workshops last year and the independent review of Pharmac in 2022, provides a clear sense of the direction we need to take as an organisation.”

Bennett says Pharmac is preparing for a reset to make the organisation more outward-focused and is confident that consumers and stakeholders will start to see the changes that they have been asking for.

The Pharmac Board has proactively released the executive summary of the independent workplace culture review on Pharmac’s website.

From finger pricks to freedom

Source: PHARMAC

Life was admin heavy

“Life was just admin heavy. I was doing injections every day and testing my blood sugar at every meal, so I was ecstatic when I heard the news,” she says.

“I think back to when I was 10, and my mum would wake me up two-to-three times every night to check my blood sugar. This technology will make a real difference for people with diabetes, especially children.”

The process of funding CGMs alongside insulin pumps involved innovation, commercial processes, collaboration, and the input of the wider health and disability system.

How we did it

The process began in February 2023 when Pharmac gave notice of a future procurement opportunity to suppliers. In July 2023, Pharmac invited proposals from suppliers through a request for proposals. Pharmac then developed a proposal to fund CGMs alongside insulin pumps and insulin pump consumables and asked the public what they thought.

“We received significant feedback. While most of the feedback supported our proposal, it was clear that we needed to do further work with clinicians, consumer groups, and suppliers, to better understand the options and the needs of people with diabetes. We knew how important it was to get this right,” says Pharmac Senior Therapeutic Group Manager, Conal Edwards. 

People were central to our work

In May 2024, Pharmac extended the funding timeline to ensure we had all the information needed to make the right decision.

Throughout June and July, Pharmac staff met with a large range of people to discuss the feedback. This included the Pharmac Diabetes Advisory Committee, Diabetes NZ, the New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes, Health New Zealand, and other government agencies, as well as suppliers, and other interested parties.

Pharmac hosted an online webinar for the first time, attended by over 700 people, to provide an update on the CGM work. This provided the community a chance to engage directly with Pharmac and have their questions and concerns addressed by Pharmac staff. 

A decision is made

In August, Pharmac staff presented the updated proposal, including the feedback and amendments made, to the Pharmac Board. The Board approved the proposal and from 1 October 2024, CGMs were funded and available to people with type 1 diabetes, alongside new arrangements for funded insulin pumps and consumables.

Since then, more than 16,000 people with type 1 diabetes have been prescribed funded CGMs.

“It really is a testament to all of the people with type 1 diabetes who saw these devices as life changing for their health care and were determined to work with Pharmac to see them funded,” Edwards says.

Life changing

For Georgie, having access to funded CGMs is ‘life changing’.

“Understanding how to monitor my blood sugars, knowing how certain foods affected me, and when, and how much insulin I should be using has changed my life. Once upon a time you didn’t know how you were going until you felt it. This is better.”