Ancient DNA shows how Pasifika carried pigs across the ocean

Source: Radio New Zealand

By Christine Rovi of PMN

123RF

A major genetic study has revealed how Pacific people helped move pigs across the ocean for thousands of years, shaping island life, culture, and ecosystems from Southeast Asia to Polynesia.

The study, published in the journal Science, looked at the DNA of more than 700 pigs, including living animals and archaeological remains.

By comparing their genomes, researchers were able to track where pigs came from, when they arrived on different islands, and how they mixed with local pig species.

The research was led by Professor Laurent Frantz from Queen Mary University of London and Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Dr David Stanton from Cardiff University, and Professor Greger Larson from the University of Oxford.

Scientists from Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vanuatu were also part of the team.

For a long time, scientists believed many animals could not cross a major natural divide known as the Wallace Line, which separates Asian wildlife from Australasian species.

While animals such as monkeys and leopards remained on the Asian side, pigs were found on both sides of the boundary.

The new study shows this did not happen naturally. Instead, people carried pigs with them as they travelled and settled across islands.

Early Pacific journeys

The earliest movements may have happened as far back as 50,000 years ago when people living in Sulawesi, known for some of the world’s oldest cave art, moved warty pigs to nearby islands such as Timor.

The pigs may have been taken along to provide food for future hunting. Around 4000 years ago, pig movements increased quickly as early farming communities expanded into the Pacific.

From a Polynesian archaeology perspective, the findings support long-held knowledge that Pacific voyagers travelled with food systems, not just people, and that pigs reflect careful planning and adaptation as communities settled new islands.

Researchers say these journeys started from Taiwan, moved through the Philippines and eastern Indonesia, and continued into Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, and remote Polynesia.

Researchers at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre say pigs hold deep cultural value there and were intentionally brought by ancestors than arriving by chance as invasive animals.

Stanton, the lead author, says the research shows how human movement across the Pacific reshaped animal populations over time.

“This research reveals what happens when people transport animals enormous distances, across one of the world’s most fundamental natural boundaries,” he says. “These movements led to pigs with a melting pot of ancestries.”

Mixing with local species

The study also found that many pigs escaped or were released and became wild.

In some places like the Komodo Islands, pigs introduced in different periods interbred. These hybrid pigs are now an important food source for the endangered Komodo dragon.

European pigs were also introduced during the colonial period, adding another layer to the region’s complex history.

Larson says pigs were ready to spread once people helped them reach new islands. “When people have lent a hand, pigs were all too willing to spread out on newly colonised islands in South East Asia and into the Pacific,” he says.

“By sequencing the genomes of ancient and more recent populations, we’ve been able to link those movements to specific human populations in both space and time.”

Big questions for Pacific conservation

The findings raise difficult questions for conservation. Today, pigs are seen very differently across the Pacific.

In some places, they are sacred, spiritually important or central to culture. In others, they are pests, while in some islands, pigs have been present for so long that they are treated almost as native species.

Pigs for the Tongan King’s coronation feast. Kavaforums

Pacific scholars say the findings question Western ideas of what is considered “native”, showing that animals present for thousands of years are now part of Pacific landscapes and history.

Frantz says the research helps uncover layers of human activity across the region and challenges simple conservation labels.

“It is very exciting that we can use ancient DNA from pigs to peel back layers of human activity across this megabiodiverse region,” he says.

“The big question now is, at what point do we consider something native? What if people introduced species tens of thousands of years ago? Are these worth conservation efforts?”

Pacific conservation practitioners say pigs highlight ongoing challenges in the region, where their cultural importance must be balanced against real environmental damage.

The researchers say future conservation efforts in the Pacific will need to respect culture, history, and community knowledge instead of relying only on traditional definitions of “native and invasive species.

PMN

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Petition against deep sea mining near Mariana Trench gaining support

Source: Radio New Zealand

Polymetallic nodules in the western Atlantic Ocean. This image was captured on a deep sea research mission in 2019. NOAA Ocean Exploration

More than 3,000 people from U.S. territories have signed a petition opposing proposed deep seabed mining in waters near the Mariana Islands and American Samoa, warning of irreversible environmental damage and the exclusion of Indigenous communities from decision-making.

In a letter addressed to Guam Senator Therese M. Terlaje, the petition’s authors said the federal government was pursuing mining proposals without the free, prior and informed consent of the Indigenous peoples who would be most affected.

They argued the plans highlight the limited political power of residents in US territories, where local voices were often sidelined in decisions that directly affect land, ocean, and livelihoods.

The petition claims deep sea mining is incompatible with a healthy marine environment and threatens biodiversity, cultural heritage, and traditional ocean stewardship.

It adds, Pacific Islander communities depend on the ocean for their survival and identity, and that the permanent extraction of seabed minerals would amount to a one-time loss of resources that have existed “since the dawn of time,” especially as climate change accelerates environmental pressures.

The waters around the Pacific Ocean territory are estimated to contain large amounts of potato-shaped rocks known as polymetallic nodules filled with the building blocks for electric vehicles and electronics. Impossible Metals

Drawing parallels with past extractive industries in both the Pacific and the Caribbean, the signatories said such activities have brought long-term environmental harm while undermining self-determination and Indigenous governance.

They are calling on the US government to immediately halt any plans for deep seabed mining in the Marianas and American Samoa and to commit to inclusive, community-led decision-making.

The petition also questions why island communities continue to bear the risks of resource extraction for the global energy transition, while investments to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels remain limited.

Organizers said they would continue collecting signatures until the public comment period closes on 12 January and plan to formally submit the petition on the deadline.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Tonga’s Cabinet line-up announced for new parliament term

Source: Radio New Zealand

Lord Fakafanua receives appointment confirmation from King Tupou VI at the Royal Palace in Nuku’alofa, Tonga. 18 December 2025 Tonga Prime Minister’s Office

The inner circle of Tonga’s legislative assembly has been confirmed, with new prime minister Lord Fakafanua announcing his selection of cabinet ministers on Monday afternoon.

Fakafanua will take on the police, fire and emergency services portfolios for his government, as well as disaster management, climate change and communications.

He has named Dr Viliami Latu as his deputy. Among his portfolios are justice and economic development.

Crown Prince Tupouto’a Ulukalala returns as the minister in charge of foreign affairs and defence. He has been appointed from outside of parliament, which is permitted under Tonga’s constitution.

Former prime minister Hu’akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni is also back at the decision-making table as fourth in the cabinet line-up. He has picked up the health and public enterprises portfolios.

Dr Taniela Fusimalohi, who was former prime minister Dr ‘Aisake Eke’s deputy prime minister, has also made it into cabinet as Minister for Lands, Survey, Planning and Natural Resources.

King Tupou VI has already appointed Fakafanua’s ministers to cabinet, according to Monday’s Tonga parliament announcement. This is a formal process enshrined in Tonga’s constitution.

The appointment of the King’s son, the Crown Prince, to parliament increases the size of the size of the legislative assembly, which has a base of 26 elected representatives from the general election. According to the constitution, up to four ministers can be appointed to Cabinet from outside parliament.

The only woman elected to Tonga’s parliament, Fane Fituafe, has also been named as a cabinet minister. Fituafe, who is a new MP, takes on a range of portfolios including women, social affairs and employment.

Monday’s cabinet announcement concludes the parliamentary election process that began with Tonga’s general election voting day on 20 November last year.

Twenty-six representatives (17 peoples’ representatives and nine nobles’ representatives) were elected by voters on that day – making up the country’s legislative assembly or parliament.

Following this, the group then conducted a vote for prime minister on 15 December, with Fakafanua winning over his predecessor Dr ‘Aisake Eke 16 votes to 10. Fakafanua was then formally appointed by the King to the office of prime minister, in keeping with Tonga’s constitution.

The King also appointed Lord Vaea as the speaker of the new parliament, and Lord Tu’iha’angana as his deputy. Both speaker positions can only be held by nobles’ representatives.

Cabinet lineup:

1. Lord Fakafanua

Prime Minister

Minister for Meteorology, Energy, Information, Disaster Management, Environment, Communications and Climate Change (MEIDECC)

Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Services, and Prisons

2. Dr Viliami Latu

Deputy Prime Minister

Minister for Justice

Minister for Trade and Economic Development

3. Crown Prince Tupouto’a ‘Ulukalala

Minister for His Majesty’s Diplomatic Services

Minister for His Majesty’s Armed Forces

4. Hu’akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni

Minister for Public Enterprises

Minister for Health

5. Lataifaingata’a Tangimana

Minister for Finance & National Planning

6. Semisi Sika

Minister for Tourism

Minister for Infrastructure

7. Dr Taniela Fusimalohi

Minister for Lands, Survey, Planning and Natural Resources

8. Dr Mo’ale ‘Otunuku

Minister for Education and Training

9. Sevenitini Toumo’ua

Minister for Customs and Inland Revenue

10. Viliami Sisifa

Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forests

Minister for Fisheries

11. Fane Fituafe

Minister for Internal Affairs, Employment, Women, Social Protection, Youth and Sports.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Trump attacked Venezuela and arrested its president. Is that legal?

Source: Radio New Zealand

By Aaron Blake, CNN

Fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela’s largest military complex, is seen from a distance after a series of explosions in Caracas on January 3, 2026. The United States military was behind a series of strikes against the Venezuelan capital Caracas on Saturday. CNN/SUPPLIED

Analysis – On 2 November, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told Vanity Fair that land strikes in Venezuela would require the approval of Congress. She said that if Trump “were to authorise some activity on land, then it’s war, then [we’d need] Congress”.

Days later, Trump administration officials privately told members of Congress much the same thing – that they lacked the legal justification to support attacks against any land targets in Venezuela.

Just two months later, though, the Trump administration has done what it previously indicated it couldn’t.

It launched what Trump called a “large scale strike against Venezuela” and captured its president, Nicolás Maduro, to face charges. And it launched this regime change effort without the approval of Congress.

(Trump in November claimed he didn’t need congressional authorisation for land action, but it clearly wasn’t the consensus view in the administration.)

US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth look on as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine (out of frame) speaks to the press following US military actions in Venezuela. CNN/SUPPLIED

It appears the mission is, for now, limited to removing Maduro. But as Trump noted, it did involve striking inside the country – the same circumstance some in the administration previously indicated required authorization that it didn’t have. CNN reported back in early November that the administration was seeking a new legal opinion from the Justice Department for such strikes.

And Trump in a news conference Saturday spoke repeatedly about not just arresting Maduro, but also running Venezuela and taking over its oil – comments that could certainly be understood to suggest this was about more than arresting Maduro.

Legally dubious strikes inside another country – even ones narrowly tailored at removing a foreign leaders – are hardly unheard of in recent American history. But even in that context, this one is remarkable.

Shifting justifications

That’s because the Trump administration has taken remarkably little care to offer a consistent set of justifications or a legal framework for the attack. And it doesn’t even appear to have notified Congress ahead of time, which is generally the bare minimum in such circumstances.

A full explanation of the claimed justification has yet to be issued, but the early signs are characteristically confusing.

Republican Sen Mike Lee of Utah said shortly after the strikes that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him the attack was needed to, in Lee’s words, “protect and defend those executing the arrest warrant” against Maduro.

“This action likely falls within the president’s inherent authority under Article II of the Constitution to protect US personnel from an actual or imminent attack,” said Lee, a frequent critic of unauthorized foreign military action.

Hours later, Vice President JD Vance echoed that line.

“And PSA for everyone saying this was ‘illegal’: Maduro has multiple indictments in the United States for narcoterrorism,” Vance said on X. “You don’t get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live in a palace in Caracas.”

At a later news conference, Rubio echoed the line that the military had been supporting “a law enforcement function”.

But there are many people living in other countries that are under indictment in the United States; it is not the US government’s usual course to launch strikes on foreign countries to bring them to justice.

President of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro participates in a civic-military rally in Caracas, Venezuela, on November 25, 2025. CNN/SUPPLIED

The administration also hadn’t previously indicated that military force could be legally used for this reason.

Initially, Trump threatened land strikes inside Venezuela to target drug traffickers – this despite Venezuela being an apparently somewhat small player in the drug-trafficking game.

Later, the administration suggested strikes might be needed because Venezuela sent bad people into the United States.

And then, after initially downplaying the role of oil in the US pressure campaign against Venezuela and Maduro, Trump said he aimed to reclaim “the oil, land, and other assets that they previously stole from us”.

The signals were confusing enough that even the hawkish Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina in mid-December indicated the administration lacked “clarity” in its messaging.

“I want clarity right here,” Graham said. “President Trump is saying his days are numbered. That seems to me that he’s gotta go. If it’s the goal of taking him out because he’s a threat to our country, then say it. And what happens next? Don’t you think most people want to know that?”

Leading countries by crude oil reserves, 2023 (billions of barrels). Note: Data excludes oil sands, which are mainly exploited by Canada. OPEC/CNN

Despite the focus on the law enforcement operation on Saturday, Trump at the news conference said the United States would now participate in running Venezuela, at least temporarily. And he repeatedly spoke about its oil.

“We’re going to rebuild the oil infrastructure,” Trump said, adding at another point: “We’re going to run the country right.”

And even if the administration had offered a more consistent justification, that doesn’t mean it would be an appropriate one.

A controversial 1989 memo

The most recent major example of using the US military for regime change is, of course, the war in Iraq. That war was authorized by Congress in 2002. The broader war on terror was authorized by Congress in 2001, after the 9/11 attacks.

Since then, administrations have sought to justify several military actions in the Middle East using those authorisations – sometimes dubiously. But Venezuela is in an entirely different theater.

While many have compared the effort in Venezuela to Iraq, the better comparison – and one the administration apparently intends to make – is Panama in 1989.

Like in Venezuela, Panama’s leader at the time, Manuel Noriega, was under US indictment, including for drug-trafficking. And like in Venezuela, the operation was less a large-scale war than a narrowly tailored effort to remove the leader from power.

The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in 1980 had concluded that the FBI didn’t have the authority to apprehend and abduct a foreign national to face justice. But George HW Bush administration’s OLC quietly reversed that in the summer of 1989.

A memo written by William P. Barr, who would later become attorney general in that Bush administration and Trump’s first administration, said a president had “inherent constitutional authority” to order the FBI to take people into custody in foreign countries, even if it violated international law to do so.

That memo was soon used to justify the operation to remove Noriega. (As it happens, Noriega was captured the same day Maduro was: January 3,1990.)

But that memo remains controversial to this day. It’s also an extraordinarily broad grant of authority, potentially allowing US military force anywhere.

Pedestrians walk past destroyed containers lay at La Guaira port after explosions were heard in Venezuela, Saturday, 3 January 2026. CNN/SUPPLIED

And the situation in Venezuela could differ in that it’s a larger country that could prove tougher to control with its leader in foreign custody. It also has significant oil wealth, meaning other countries could take an interest in what happens there next. (China has called the attack a “blatant use of force against a sovereign state.”)

In both the news conference and an interview with Fox News on Saturday morning, Trump invoked the possibility of further military option, reinforcing that this could be about more than just arresting Maduro.

That also means the questions about Trump’s legal authorities could again be tested – just as he’s already tested them with his legally dubious strikes on alleged drug boats and other actions in the region.

What’s clear is that Trump is seeking to yet again test the limits of his authority as president – and Americans’ tolerance for it. But this time he’s doing it on one of the biggest stages yet. And the story of his stretching of the law certainly isn’t over.

– CNN

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘The mood is of happiness and hope’ – Venezuelans in NZ

Source: Radio New Zealand

A person flutters a national flag in Caracas on January 3, 2026, after US forces captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. AFP / FEDERICO PARRA

A Venezuelan woman living in New Zealand says her family and friends in Venezuela are happy – but anxious – about the move by the United States to capture the Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

Ari Ruiz and her sister Katherine Halkett have both lived in New Zealand for more than 10 years.

Ruiz said she rang her parents in Venezuela this morning to tell them the news, and her mother broke into happy tears.

Ruiz said her parents hoped this will be the first step towards change for the country.

“There has also been a lot of uncertainty about what comes next,” said Katherine Halkett.

“I think that is where a lot of the anxiety comes from, but the mood in Venezuela, of most Venezuelans, is of happiness and hope. The attacks started at about 8 o’clock (pm) New Zealand time, and we haven’t stopped watching the news since and it very scary.”

Halkett said their parents are in Barquisimeto – about five hours drive from Caracas where the attacks were – and knew nothing of the attacks until their phone call.

Other friends and family members who live in Caracas had a very different experience.

“None of them were in any danger at any point, but there were loud noises, windows shaken by the explosion, and smoke. Very scary of course.”

MARTIN BERNETTI/AFP

Halkett said America’s reasons for the attack may be complicated, but she said people who say it was all about oil did not understand the situation in Venezuela.

“To all the people in New Zealand, from the comfort of their couches with all their human rights, I tell them that we in Venezuela have not had access to the petroleum money from the Venezuelan government for many years.

“They have given away our petrol to Iran, to Cuba, to Russia, to China. So for them now to be worried about our petrol when we haven’t had our petrol for many years.

“That’s why Venezuelans are not really worried about that.”

Halkett said people in New Zealand were worried about what will happen with the petrol, but not the torture, state violence and political detainees.

Halkett said about 90 percent of the population lived in poverty, with about half the population in extreme poverty.

“My mum’s pension is $US4 a month, and box of 20 eggs is $US10, so people are dying,” said Ruiz. “People don’t have access to food.”

Ruiz said their family and friends say the streets have been very quiet, and it felt as if everyone was waiting to see what will happen next.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Kiwi expert on Venezuela attack: ‘Time that we made our voice clear’

Source: Radio New Zealand

Otago University international relations Professor Robert Patman. Provided

New Zealand experts in international relations and law have criticised the attack on Venezuela by the United States, saying the move is also a direct challenge to New Zealand.

International relations Professor Robert Patman of the University of Otago described the US’ military actions against Venezuela as an audacious move.

“It’s a direct challenge for countries like New Zealand, which support the view that international relations should be based on rules, procedures and laws,” he told RNZ’s Worldwatch.

On Saturday, the US attacked the Venezuelan capital Caracas and captured the South American nation’s president and his wife, citing alleged drug offences.

The fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela’s largest military complex, after a series of explosions in Caracas on 3 January, 2026. LUIS JAIMES

Patman said while many would be pleased to see Nicolas Maduro gone, that did not mean they would be happy the US “[violated] Venezuela’s sovereignty”.

He believed New Zealand’s response to the US action in Venezuela should be firm and robust, and that the US had shown little regard for New Zealand’s interests by imposing tariffs.

“When in fact, the United States faces virtually little or no tariffs on their own products coming to this country.”

He also highlighted that New Zealand did not speak out in defence of Canada or Denmark when the Trump administration made “territorial threats” against them.

“I think it’s time that we made our voice clear. Foreign policy in this country has been traditionally bipartisan. We have stood up for the rule of law internationally.”

Foreign Minister Winston Peters earlier on Sunday said New Zealand was “concerned”, calling on “all parties to act in accordance with international law”. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s office declined to add more to Peters’ statement when asked by RNZ.

Patman said it was important that while New Zealand might not support the Maduro government, it should be up to the people of Venezuela to decide what happens in their political leadership.

University of Waikato international law Professor Al Gillespie also urged for Venezuelan people to have the opportunity of choosing their country’s next leader.

He said the “worst-case scenario” now was that the US attempted to run the country.

Professor Alexander Gillespie of the University of Waikato. Alexander Gillespie

Trump has claimed the US would “run” Venezuala in the meantime.

“I think an ideal situation, if you were seriously concerned about the corrupt practices of that regime, is that you would call for an election.”

He said Venezuela should be handed over to an independent body such as the Organisation of American States or the United Nations.

“You’d let the regional or international community govern an election process so the Venezuelan people can speak to their own interests.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Live: Worldwatch special on US attack on Venezuela

Source: Radio New Zealand

This combination of pictures created on August 08, 2025 shows Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro (L) in Caracas on January 10, 2025, and US President Donald Trump (R) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on July 15, 2025. Powerful explosions, resembling aircraft flyovers, were heard blasting in Caracas on January 3, 2026 at around 2:00 am (0600 GMT), an AFP journalist reported. The sounds of explosions come as US President Donald Trump, who has deployed a large navy armada in the Caribbean with a stated mission of combatting drug trafficking, raised the possibility of ground strikes against Venezuela. JUAN BARRETO / AFP

RNZ presents a special edition of Worldwatch, airing after the midday news from about 12.10pm – listen live in the player above.

On Saturday, the US attacked the Venezuelan capital Caracas and captured President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, citing alleged drug offences.

US President Donald Trump said in the meantime, the US would “run” the South American nation, which has some of the world’s largest oil reserves.

The New Zealand government has expressed concern, calling on all parties to respect and follow international law, while the United Nations has called an emergency meeting for Monday.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Why did fashion make us so mad in 2025?

Source: Radio New Zealand

Fashion! A delight to the senses, a thing of beauty, a source of pleasure, pain and, in its determined ridiculousness, humor. But this year, fashion was more likely to inspire something else: pure, unadulterated rage.

Sydney Sweeney’s great jeans ad — or were they great genes?! — became a cultural firestorm so potent that President Donald Trump weighed in, praising the campaign on Truth Social as “the HOTTEST ad out there”. Months later, Sweeney is still offering explanations in interviews, and one can’t help but politicise her haircuts and clothing choices.

Dutch indie designer (and, in the months since, the head of Jean Paul Gaultier) Duran Lantink’s hilariously realistic top made of jiggling oversized breasts, worn by a male model at Paris Fashion Week in March, was so hotly debated that former Fox news anchor Megyn Kelly dedicated a segment of her podcast to dissecting the look.

At Paris Fashion Week, models walking the Duran Lantink runway show wore prosthetics in the form of chiseled abs (pictured) and bouncing breasts.

AFP / Bertrand Guay

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘The Wire’ actor Isiah Whitlock Jr. dies aged 71

Source: Radio New Zealand

Isiah Whitlock Jr., whose singular delivery of a tagline in The Wire gave the world one of the most iconic phrases of the century, has died at the age of 71.

Whitlock “passed away today peacefully in NYC after a brave battle with a short illness”, his manager, Brian Liebman, told CNN. “Isiah was a brilliant actor and even better person.”

Whitlock had a storied career spanning more than three decades in both TV and film. He appeared in a number of Spike Lee movies, including Da 5 Bloods, BlacKkKlansman and The 25th Hour.

He got his start in TV on Cagney & Lacey in the 1980s and went on to appear often in police procedurals, from Law & Order to NYPD Blue. Most recently on TV, Whitlock played a police chief on The Residence, a Netflix murder mystery starring Uzo Aduba.

Whitlock will be most remembered for his unforgettable role in The Wire, David Simon’s HBO crime drama, which is widely recognised as one of the best series of all time.

Whitlock appeared on all five seasons of the show as R. Clayton “Clay” Davis, a crooked Maryland state senator. He quickly became known for his unique reaction to events, delivering an elongated “s**t” that catapulted straight into the American lexicon.

Whitlock reveled in the attention that his delivery received. “I was in, I think, Grand Central Station and far away I heard someone say it and they’d be kind of smiling,” he told an interviewer in 2008. “I’m glad people enjoy it.”

In 2014, he started a YouTube series teaching people how they, too, could perfectly say it. Whitlock said he got the phrase from his late uncle Leon, who delivered it in a way that would always make people laugh.

“Do I get tired of it? No,” he told the AP in 2020. “If it makes you feel good, so be it,” he said with a smile.

Whitlock also had a recurring role on Veep, playing General George Maddox, a defense secretary who toys with a primary run against Vice President Selina Meyer, played by Julia Louis-Dreyfus.

Whitlock grew up in Indiana, the fifth of 10 children, and studied at the American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco before moving to New York, where he lived for decades.

“He was loved by all who had the pleasure to work with or know him,” his manager said. “He will be greatly missed.”

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘Princess Bride’ star’s emotional tribute to Rob Reiner

Source: Radio New Zealand

The star of one of Rob Reiner’s most celebrated films, The Princess Bride, has posted a lengthy and loving tribute to the director and his wife, more than two weeks after they were found dead, saying he “can finally put my grief into words.”

Cary Elwes shared footage of the filming of the beloved 1987 film on his verified Instagram account, as well as a conversation with Reiner, who he described as “a brilliant filmmaker” whose laugh he loved.

“I was 24 when I first met Rob Reiner on The Princess Bride,” Elwes wrote. “And from that very first meeting I fell in love with him. I was already a fan of his work so meeting him in person was a dream come true.”

Cary Elwes in The Princess Bride (1987), directed by Rob Reiner.

Archives du 7eme Art / Photo12 via AFP

From that moment, Elwes said he “knew this was someone I wanted in my life.”

“I also knew that by casting me as Westley he was giving me the keys to the castle,” Elwes wrote.

Elwes portrays the film’s main character, who goes on a swashbuckling adventure to save the love of his life. It was a role so life changing for the actor that he penned the 2014 book As You Wish: Inconceivable Tales from the Making of The Princess Bride about his experience.

“The first thing I noticed about Rob was that he wore his heart on his sleeve. This was a man who felt deeply,” Elwes wrote on Instagram. “He wasn’t impressed by how much money you had or if you had a privileged upbringing. He just wanted to know if you were a ‘good guy.'”

From left, musician David Foster, actor Jim Carrey, actor Cary Elwes, and director and producer Rob Reiner attend the ‘As You Wish’ book launch on 6 October, 2014 in West Hollywood, California.

Ari Perilstein / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP

The Reiners were found dead in their Los Angeles home earlier this month. Their son, Nick Reiner, has been charged with their murders.

Reiner “loved his family and friends immensely,” Elwes wrote.

“He obviously loved making movies – and was clearly a brilliant filmmaker – but he told me what he really enjoyed the most was the experience itself. He used to say, ‘Once the movie is released it belongs to other people. But while you are making it, that’s your time on the planet, so you wanna make it good,'” the actor wrote. “And boy was my time with him on The Princess Bride beyond great. I can’t remember a single day without laughter. The movie is about love, loyalty and sacrifice. Things that Rob held dear.”

That made Reiner “the perfect person” to direct that now iconic film, Elwes said.

Cary Elwes and Robin Wright in The Princess Bride (1987), directed by Rob Reiner.

20TH CENTURY FOX / Archives du 7eme Art / Photo12 via AFP

He also mourned the death of Reiner’s wife, Michele Singer Reiner, who the director met while filming another of his celebrated movies, When Harry Met Sally…

“Besides being a gifted photographer she was an incredibly loving, intelligent person. Deeply passionate about her family and about lifting others up,” Elwes wrote. “To say that they were a great team would be an understatement. Their only interest in fame was that it allowed them to shine a light on causes they believed in, especially helping those who were marginalized.”

Elwes ended his note with condolences to the Reiner family as well as heartfelt gratitude for the couple.

“Thank you Rob and Michele for sharing your life and art with us,” he wrote. “Because my heart still aches every time I think of you, I know the grief of losing you too soon will likely never go away. Sure, death cannot stop true love but life is pain without you.”

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand