Specialist says Family Court needs to be screened for violence

Source: Radio New Zealand

Debbs Murray is a survivor of domestic violence and now heads Eclipse. supplied

A family violence specialist says she is regularly contacted by women who say their abusive partner has shared custody of their kids and they wish they never left.

It comes as newly released information reveals officials shelved work to see how families in custody battles could be better screened for domestic violence.

Debbs Murray is a survivor of domestic violence and now heads Eclipse, a service that aims to prevent family violence and train those working in the sector.

She said it breaks her heart to hear from women who say their abusive ex-partners are given unsupervised custody of their children.

“I get emails from women who say I should’ve just stayed because the Family Court has allowed my children to go unsupervised to a known family violence abuser and if I’d stayed at least I would’ve had eyes on.”

Murray said every case in the Family Court needs to be screened for violence, but they are not.

She is often contacted by women who want to have a formal risk assessment conducted by an expert.

“That’s part of why I’m contacted as well, because they want someone anyone to be able to present the risk that they are experiencing into the judicial space.”

Backbone Collective advocates for survivors of domestic violence and received a raft of information from the Ministry of Justice about introducing a formal risk assessment for those embroiled in family law proceedings.

The response showed Family Court Principal Judge Jackie Moran had started the work but it had been shut down at steering committee level in 2023.

A Ministry presentation included in the official information response stated they did not know if people coming to the Family Court have experienced family violence.

Backbone’s manager and co-founder Deborah Mackenzie said that’s a big gap and puts a lot of responsibility on the court-appointed psychologists and lawyers who assess such situations.

“What we know from everything victim survivors and children have shared with Backbone is that the reports they’re giving to Family Court judges often minimise the violence and abuse or they don’t believe protective parents and children when they disclose violence and abuse.”

She said it’s putting some people – mostly women and children – at risk.

“The judiciary are making decisions that force children into unsupervised care and contact with abusive parents as a result.”

Ministry of Justice group manager for commissioning and service improvement Lance Harrison said court staff may identify risk factors informally then refer the participant to a support service that must conduct formal risk assessments.

He said family violence response training is also provided to people working in the courts.

University of Auckland associate professor of law, Carrie Leonetti, said the Family Court accepts evidence of domestic violence only from court-appointed psychologists and lawyers.

“Women go to places like Shine and they go to places like Women’s Refuge and they get an evidence based risk assessment done,” she said.

“That evidence based risk assessment says this child is not safe in the care of the other parent or it is not safe for this person to have shared legal guardianship with the perpetrator it will put them at risk and the Family Court won’t accept the evidence.”

Carrie Leonetti is also a professorial lecturer in law at George Washington University’s domestic violence programme.

At times she is approached to do risk assessments.

“I’ve had women come to me and want to contract, privately, reports from me and I’ve had to say to them they won’t take it in evidence. The court won’t consider anything an expert in domestic violence has to say they won’t even admit the evidence. They only want to hear from their court psychologist.”

She says it is out of keeping with international practice and does not have to be that way.

Leonetti believed it comes down to the Family Court’s interpretation of section 133 of the Care of Children Act – which enables the court to hire psychologist to assess a child’s best interests.

“For years not the Family Court has interpreted section 133 of the Care of Children Act to mean that they won’t take evidence from any psychologists or any social workers or any psychiatrists other than the ones that they appoint and assign to the case.”

Backbone Collective is calling for the Minister of Justice to fund and progress work to ensure victims of family violence are identified and not put at further risk in custody disputes.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Zuru wins trademark battle against Lego

Source: Radio New Zealand

The dispute was around a simple phrase printed on packaging of Zuru’s own-brand MAX Build More plastic brick building kits: “LEGO® BRICK COMPATIBLE.” Pixabay

Zuru has scored a major win in its long-running legal fight with Lego, the Court of Appeal overturning a High Court ruling that had found Zuru breached Lego’s trademark.

The heart of the dispute centred on a simple phrase printed on packaging of Zuru’s own-brand MAX Build More plastic brick building kits: “LEGO® BRICK COMPATIBLE.”

Lego argued the wording infringed its trademark, potentially misleading shoppers into thinking Zuru’s cheaper bricks were Lego products or endorsed by Lego.

In 2023, the High Court agreed, ruling Zuru had infringed Lego’s trademark, but today, the Court of Appeal said the High Court had got it wrong.

The judges found Zuru’s statement to be purely descriptive, telling consumers the bricks work with Lego, not that they were actual Lego bricks.

In its written decision, the court said, “When use of LEGO is seen in its full context, the consumer would think that Zuru’s bricks were MAX BUILD MORE bricks.”

“The phrase ‘LEGO® BRICK COMPATIBLE’ is descriptive, not a badge of origin.”

Double loss for Lego

The court also dismissed Lego’s counter claims of passing off and misleading conduct under the Fair-Trading Act, saying shoppers would clearly see Zuru’s own brand, MAX Build More, on the packaging.

The court said there was no evidence of confusion.

The ruling aligns a legal precedent with Australia’s, known as “comparative advertising” – using a competitor’s trademark to make a comparison of products.

Comparative advertising is allowed under New Zealand law, providing its honest and not misleading.

For Zuru, it means the company can reinstate the phrase, “LEGO® BRICK COMPATIBLE” back onto its Max Build More packaging.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

7000 pensioners overcharged in another Inland Revenue error

Source: Radio New Zealand

An IR error has affected thousands of pensioners. Supplied

Almost 7000 pensioners have been affected by another Inland Revenue error.

Last week, RNZ reported that 4500 people had overpaid tax after their imputation credits had been incorrectly recorded in their prep-populated tax returns.

Others got in touch and said they had also experienced a problem, this time with the way that NZ Super was recorded for ACC purposes.

One man said he had been charged $301.68 in ACC earner levy for $18,854.98 of gross income from NZ Super that should not have attracted a levy at all.

He said he was not able to control this when he completed his return and did not realise the error until the process was complete.

He said he did not think a lot more about it but when he saw RNZ’s reporting of the other error, he realised that there had been at least two this year.

“This really starts to suggest a deficiency in change control of IRD systems.”

Another couple said they wanted assurance that Inland Revenue had taken steps to stop it happening again.

Inland Revenue said 6778 people were affected.

“There was an issue identified earlier this year where we were not populating the ‘earnings not liable’ figure correctly for some customers. We fixed those returns for the customers in July 2025.”

Chartered Accountants Australia New Zealand tax leader John Cuthbertson said ACC was not paid on NZ Super because it was not liable income.

“However, if you’re working and receiving NZ Super, your earnings from that work do attract levies.”

“The advancements in digitalisation and MyIR have been quite incredible, except when it goes wrong like this. You shouldn’t need a Chartered Accountant to check prepopulated forms, but the average person might not know that super income does not attract ACC levies. We used to say ‘google it’ but many taxpayers are now using AI to do a basic check of their tax returns, asking simple questions like ‘Should I pay ‘x’ levy on ‘y’ income?”

Angus Ogilvie, managing director of Generate Accounting Group, said it was concerning that issues seemed to be leading to erroneous data being prepopulated into Inland Revenue’s system.

“The new software employed was a very costly and complex project. However, taxpayers should expect that there is a high level of diligence applied to get their tax obligations right. Let’s hope that the department is devoting urgent resource to correct these issues”.

[ https://rnz.us6.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=211a938dcf3e634ba2427dde9&id=b4c9a30ed6 Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds], a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Heat, holidays, hikes, and a ‘stinking strong’ sun

Source: Radio New Zealand

Whangamatā is one of the Coromandel Peninsula’s summer hotspots. 123RF

With tourism numbers back to pre-Covid levels, New Zealanders are getting ready for a swarm of tourists. Experts say tourists – local or not – should be ready for some changeable weather.

Tourists chasing the classic Kiwi summer of bright blue skies and postcard-perfect beaches are being warned to prepare for a season that could serve up everything from scorching heat to sudden downpours – sometimes in the same afternoon.

Earth Sciences New Zealand principal scientist and meteorologist Chris Brandolino warns that tourists are often unprepared for the strength and unpredictability of Kiwi weather.

“People coming from overseas, they probably don’t have a full appreciation of our weather and climate, particularly the strength of the sun – how stinking strong the sun is in December and January and how quickly you can get a sunburn … and just how quickly the weather can change once you gain altitude and put yourself in a mountainous environment, how darn quickly that can change,” Brandolino tells The Detail.

“So, I think that’s something that people [visiting New Zealand] may not fully appreciate.”

From the alpine peaks of Queenstown to the golden beaches of the Coromandel, summer favourite spots are preparing for a season that may be busier and more unpredictable than usual.

Brandolino says for those who want warmer temperatures, the upper North Island is “your best bet, but if you don’t mind a bit of uncertainty, running the risk for cooler temperatures, the South Island is the place to be”.

And he’s quick to point out, when it comes to forecasting the long-term summer holiday weather, it comes down to “one woman”.

“With these three-month outlooks, what we are trying to do is predict mother nature’s personality.

“A weather forecast? That’s mother nature’s mood, and most times if you get the personality right, the mood will be aligned with that, but there can be some days where it doesn’t.”

He strongly encourages tourists to use local weather apps daily, especially when crossing mountain passes or going hiking, due to how rapidly conditions can change.

“The mountains are notoriously difficult to forecast for; they can create their own sort of environment sometimes, it seems like.

“You can hop in your caravan … and it’s expected to be a hot day, but you get to the mountain, you start gaining altitude, and it all changes quickly. Temperatures drop fast, the wind picks up, and hypothermia becomes a real thing.”

‘People are coming again’

Tourists are encouraged to check both heat and rain – even on the same day – and to check forecasts every morning and afternoon, protect themselves from UV year-round, be cautious on mountain hikes, stay updated on road conditions, have a backup plan for any outdoor activity, and never underestimate a river, track, or coastline.

And it’s likely there will be a lot of tourists to heed this advice this summer – international tourism numbers have bounced back close to pre-Covid levels, with expectations they’ll hit the 2030 goal of five million a year and worth of $55 billion.

Lincoln University associate professor of parks, recreation and tourism Dr Stephen Espiner says grand ambitions for a tourism reset after borders were closed during Covid have not been fulfilled.

“People are coming again, they’re getting into the national parks, they’re visiting places like Tekapo and Te Anau and Milford Sound in numbers as great as before and some of those have well exceeded the pre-pandemic numbers already,” he says.

“Many of the very same impacts that were beginning to be problematic in 2019 are with us today.”

One of Espiner’s specialities is hazard management and communication, and getting the message to tourists. As the country faces more extreme weather events, he says it is an area of growing interest among councils and agencies like Department of Conservation which want to understand more about how visitors can stay safe, “whether that’s from natural hazards to do with rockfall or avalanches or to do with forest fires as we’ve seen in the media recently,” Espiner says.

DOC closes tracks and bridges if they are deemed unsafe but visitors don’t always comply with messages or warning signs. Espiner cites the popular Cathedral Cove in the Coromandel as an example.

“The track was closed for nearly two years after storm damage and the public compliance around that signage was a long way from perfect.

“People went anyway, especially locals and New Zealand domestic visitors, they make their own assessment and decide, “oh it doesn’t look too bad to me’ and they’ll have a crack anyway.

“It was certainly frowned upon by the authorities and caused some stress for those managing the place.”

Espiner says as the country grapples with more extreme weather events, getting the message out will be crucial, starting in schools and on outdoor education courses.

The sign at the site of the closed bridge or track should be the last reminder.

“It’s your last chance to convince.”

Espiner suggests push messaging has potential as a method for warning people about hazards.

“With each of us carrying a mobile device these days, there is opportunity to warn people of particular hazards, as we well know, through things like tsunami alerts and earthquakes.

“You could use similar things presumably with wildfires or with weather events.

“If you were ever going to go and do the Heaphy track and if one thing you decided to do was to sign up to some sort of push notification service, it could be very useful to you to be warned of a heavy rainfall event or a track closure or some other incident.”

Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

In pictures: 150 years of quirky Kiwi collectibles

Source: Radio New Zealand

Over the years, Christine Fernyhough has built an extraordinary private collection of New Zealand objects, spanning everything from the 1860s through to the 1970s. Now, in her new book The Albino Kiwi & Other Rarities, she’s selected 75 remarkable pieces to showcase. Among the highlights are a rare albino kiwi specimen, cherished Maori artefacts, quirky vintage collectibles, a 10-million-year-old crab and “Molly,” the stout-legged moa.

Listen to Christine Fernyhough talk with Jesse Mulligan here.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Bids set to close for historic Wellington chapel

Source: Radio New Zealand

Potential new owners for Wellington’s historic Erskine Chapel have until Thursday afternoon to put in their bids to buy the chapel.

The building which is part of the former Erskine College is being sold by developers The Wellington Company.

The French Gothic-style chapel which was built in 1929-30 is listed as a Heritage New Zealand Category 1 Historic Place and recognised in the Wellington City Council Heritage List.

The chapel sits on the site of the former Erskine College in Island Bay and was designed by John Sydney Swan.

The chapel is considered to be New Zealand’s finest French Gothic-style chapel, influenced heavily by a chapel in Alsace Lorraine, France. It features a soaring vaulted ceiling and an interior of Italian Carrara marble.

The Wellington Company purchased the buildings in disrepair in 2000.

In 2018 the Environment Court ruled the company could demolish the school buildings, but not the chapel – which had to be saved and strengthened.

It has since been restored to the tune of $7 million and is now an event space.

Erskine Chapel is listed as a Heritage New Zealand Category 1 Historic Place. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Venue manager Kate Spencer said the chapel had hosted all sorts of events from weddings and funerals through to a recent fashion show, Christmas parties and choir performances.

But although the star of the show, the chapel only made up part of the building.

“We also have the nunnery where the nuns lived which is next door to the chapel and downstairs we have the ballroom which was the library for the girls’ school,” Spencer told RNZ during a tour of the building.

Spencer said movies such as The Frighteners had also been filmed there.

RNZ / Mark Papalii

For any potential buyer, one of the considerations will be the building’s heritage status.

Jamie Jacobs director central region for Heritage New Zealand said the building was protected in two ways.

He said it was scheduled in the Wellington District Plan as a heritage building.

Under the Resource Management Act, the site, he said was also under a heritage protection order that was held by the Save Erskine College Trust.

He said as such any major changes or work to the building would have to go through both the council and the trust.

The chapel was built in 1929-30 in French Gothic style. RNZ / Mark Papalii

The Wellington Company director of property Sam Hooper said there had been around 60 expressions of interest in the building since it went on sale.

“The way I’ve always sort of seen who might pick this up will be someone who either has been part of the chapel, either an old girl from the school … someone from Island Bay who’s seen it growing up, or someone who’s into events, weddings, looking, creating really cool spaces, or philanthropists who just love sort of heirloom assets.”

He said there was also opportunity for a church to take it over again.

“It is deconsecrated at the moment, but it can be reconsecrated,” he said. “We are in discussion with a couple of churches who are certainly looking at it.”

Meanwhile, in a statement the Save Erskine College Trust said it was hoping for a successful transition of guardianship.

“Erskine College remains a vital part of the Island Bay and wider community, including Erskine Chapel and the remnant Reverend Mother’s Garden. Along with Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and Wellington City Council, we hope for a successful transition in ownership and kaitiakitanga.”

Erskine Chapel is currently desconsecrated, but it could be reconsecrated. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Economist asks: Why not cap taxes if we’re capping rates?

Source: Radio New Zealand

Infometrics chief economist Brad Olsen says it’s “ironic” that the government has no proposal to cap taxes. 123RF

A leading economist says it’s “galling” to see government planning a rates cap for councils when it is imposing no restraints on the taxes it levies.

The government announced earlier this month that it planned to introduce a variable target band for council rate increases, probably starting with minimum increases of 2 percent and maximum of 4 percent from 2027.

But Infometrics chief economist Brad Olsen said there was a certain irony about the cap.

“It seems like it’s good enough for the government to cap rates for local government, but it’s not willing to do the same to itself.

“There’s no proposal for a tax cap that’s been put forward, which seems highly ironic, given that the government is still spending more than it’s earning for the next five years or so on most forecasts.

  • What is productivity? And are Kiwis really so bad at it? [ https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/no-stupid-questions/2025/What-is-productivity-And-are-Kiwis-really-so-bad-at-it? Listen to No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds]

“That suggests that if, as it’s been put out, that the idea of the rates cap is to limit levels of spending to more reasonable levels, then government should take a leaf out of its own book and look in the mirror a bit more.”

Infometrics calculated the average tax bill of a household with two median income earners, earning $71,760 per person before tax, not including any Working for Families credits.

Olsen said they would pay $39,080 to the government, made up about $13,750 in income tax each, and $11,600 in GST. They might pay another $3800 a year in local government rates.

He said the cost that local governments had been facing were driven by increases in spending on things like bitumen, concrete and structural steel.

“From 2019 till now, you’ve seen a 40-plus percent increase in the cost of building water infrastructure and running water infrastructure and constructing a bridge… And all of that’s now got to be funded.

“I worry that sometimes the points that are being made around the rates capping policy have been oversimplified, particularly given that there’s no recognition in the current policy for any of the differences in how different councils are currently situated. Some councils have had considerable and still have considerable growth that they’re going through, yet they’re only going to be able to change rates between inflation and headline national GDP.”

He said Wellington was an example of an area where there had not been the right level of investment into various infrastructure over time.

“For all of the challenges that are there around rates affordability, and I very much hear them every day, that’s also often what households want. They want the services that are being provided by the councils. And the challenge now with the rates capping policy likely to come into play is going to be that communities will not get what they got before.

“Something’s got to give, something will not be funded. And I think if there’s one silver lining in my mind of the rates capping policy, it will force the community to be very clear over what it’s happy to give up and it will require that there is no additions that come in without other changes.

And that means that from a council point of view, someone’s going to have to front up to some members of the community and say, you used to get something, now you don’t. What is that? Is that community halls that now don’t get funded? Is it alcohol licences that don’t get supported? Do dog registrations go on hold for a year because there’s no money? I mean, those are potentially some of the trade-offs that have to be made.”

He said part of the solution could be more willingness from the government to fund the work that it requires of councils but provides no money for, or paying rates on things it owns around the country to keep money flowing to councils.

“Because at the moment, you’ve got central government over time has continued to push more and more on to local government. There’s never any money that comes from central government to do much of that work.

“All of the various changes and rules and regulations that come through over time, they are expected to be paid for locally by the community.

Rehette Stoltz RNZ / Angus Dreaver

“There’s a huge amount of money, time and effort that goes into reviewing council budgets every three years. The community has to be consulted. It has to go through all this detail. We don’t do a lick of that when it comes to central government funding, and it takes a whole heap more money out of us every year.

So, I find it a little bit hard to stomach and understand the sort of restrictions that are being put on rates here without any sort of constraint on how much taxes continue to take out from people. It’s a whole lot more than rates ever will.”

Local Government New Zealand said the move away from a rates cap to a rates band would offer more flexibility but the band will restrict investment in core services like roads, bridges and public transport.

“We will be working through the policy detail and with our members – and taking that feedback to the government.”

Vice-president Rehette Stoltz said councils like Gisborne District were rebuilding their infrastructure following multiple severe weather events, so the policy needed to recognise different, specific needs.

“Keeping rates low is a priority for all elected members. Our community’s expectation is also that we deliver the critical infrastructure and services they rely on in a timely way,” Stoltz said.

[ https://rnz.us6.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=211a938dcf3e634ba2427dde9&id=b4c9a30ed6 Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds], a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Immunologist urges measles vaccination check before holiday travel

Source: Radio New Zealand

The measles virus, the US CDC says measles is very contagious and can be serious, and anyone who is not protected against the virus is at risk. Supplied/ US CDC

A New Zealand-based Tongan immunologist says vigilance around measles spread is particularly important as families prepare to travel over the Christmas period – both within the countries they live and across the region to visit loved ones.

Dr Chris Puli’uvea said, unlike Fiji, New Zealand’s vaccination rate for children is 82 percent. For Pacific children aged one to five, the vaccination rate sits around 80 percent.

Health NZ has recorded 30 cases of measles in New Zealand in recent weeks, including 11 in Auckland and eight in Wellington.

With local health authorities working to increase the rate to the herd-immunity level of 95 percent, Puli’uivea, a senior lecturer at the Auckland University of Technology, is encouraging open conversations around vaccinations and disease protection.

“It’s important for our different layers of communities to be able to have these conversations, reach out and talk to someone who’s had it before and what their experiences were like,” he said.

“I’m sure you could [also] find out experiences of those who haven’t had the MMR vaccine and some of the troubles that they’ve had to face as well.”

Read more:

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Taxpayers’ Union releases fudge taking swipe at Finance Minister Nicola Willis

Source: Radio New Zealand

Finance Minister Nicola Willis (left) has challenged her predecessor Ruth Richardson. RNZ/Reece Baker/Supplied

The Taxpayers’ Union (TPU) has launched a campaign targeting Finance Minister Nicola Willis and calling out what it says is the government’s “growing habit of sugar-coating fiscal truths”.

The organisation released packaged fudge from the ‘Nicola Fudge Co.’, branded with an image of Willis with the slogan, ‘A treat today – A tax tomorrow’.

TPU chair Ruth Richardson said Prime Minister Christopher Luxon had condemned the previous government’s ‘sugar-rush economics’, but that this government had “reached for the same lolly jar”.

“Rather than cutting back on sugar, Nicola Willis has poured more into the mix.

“Government spending has actually increased – both in real terms and as a proportion of the economy – since Grant Robertson left office. That’s a fiscal recipe for trouble, no matter how thickly the fudge is poured.”

She said the campaign was about calling out the “fiscal elements in the room”.

In anticipation of the campaign, Willis threw down the gauntlet on Tuesday, challenging Richardson to “come out of the shadows” and debate the substance of the issue.

Richardson initially laughed it off. But the Taxpayers’ Union later issued a media release, saying Richardson was “more than happy” to debate.

On Wednesday, Willis said she was proud of her government’s record of reprioritising spending.

“I really want the chance to defend our government.”

TPU head of communications Tory Relf told RNZ the organisation is all about “good policy” and did not mind which party it came from.

“We will work with whoever it is to deliver that good policy, and right now Minister Willis is not delivering it.”

Relf said it was not about attacking Willis as a person.

“She is Minister of Finance, the same way they did ‘Robbo’s Removals’ when he was Minister of Finance.

“Whoever was in that role, there would be a play on words or a gimmick to draw attention to the issue.”

In response to the campaign, Willis told RNZ the government was putting the books back in order.

“I’m not going to comment on silly stunts. I want a debate on the substantive policy issues.”

The TPU would not disclose how much the campaign cost, but said it had been done internally.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Is it ever okay to leave a party or social event without saying goodbye?

Source: Radio New Zealand

Whether it’s to avoid long and drawn-out goodbyes, not wanting to interrupt the hosts, or because our social batteries are empty, leaving a gathering abruptly — sometimes referred to as an “Irish goodbye” or “French exit” — can often seem like the easiest way to make a quick getaway.

But regardless of our intentions, “ghosting” a party or get-together can sometimes be perceived as rude.

We asked two experts about the etiquette of leaving a social gathering without notice and the best approaches to take if you ever do need to depart suddenly.

Regardless of our intentions, leaving a party or social gathering without saying goodbye can be interpreted as rude.

Unsplash

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand