Category: Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Investment app business Sharesies says updated economic modelling indicates the lift in the default contribution to KiwiSaver will fall short of a no-frills retirement for nearly half of retirees.

From 1 April, new default employee and employer KiwiSaver contributions come into effect, with an increase to 3.5 percent from 3 percent, with a National Party proposal to further increase to 4 percent in two years’ time, followed by increments of 0.5 percent in following years, taking the contribution to 6 percent, or 12 percent on a combined basis.

“The Government needs to be commended for raising contribution rates,” Sharesies KiwiSaver head Matt

Macpherson.

“However, averages don’t tell the whole story, which is why we turned to real world data to see the impact on everyone and not just the average person.

“What was clear is that rising contributions mainly benefit those who can already afford it.”

Macpherson said the voluntary contribution scheme, which attracted matching contributions from employers, disadvantaged people on low incomes, who were not able to save for retirement and therefore received no employer-contribution.

He said one way to improve the situation would be to make employer contributions compulsory for all New Zealanders in work.

“No matter which pathway we opt for, our numbers show that relying just on increasing contributions risks entrenching inequality.”

What the report says

The Sharesies report indicates half of its members would fall short of a no-frills retirement lifestyle, as defined by a Massey University assessment of at least $705 a week for “basic standard of living which includes few, if any, luxuries.”

Sharesies report indicates a modest increase in the default contribution rate to 4 percent would be helpful, but “still insufficient to close the retirement savings gap for most members.

“At National’s proposed 6 percent default setting, with matched employer contributions . . . the median weekly income from KiwiSaver funds would increase from $708 to $798.”

However it says even that would fall short of a no-frills lifestyle for 40 percent of pensioners, or more than 2 out of 5 people.

“Strikingly, even a young personʼs balance, with more time for returns to compound, still falls short and we can see this because the Sharesies database tends to skew younger,” Macpherson said.

Sharesies findings also aligned with the 2022 Review of Retirement Income Policies, which emphasised 40 percent of people over 65 and over relied almost entirely on NZ Super.

“Given that our sample is younger, which would in theory make our projection more optimistic, this strongly

indicates that a significant proportion of members will not have enough for a basic retirement,” the Sharesies report says.

“Furthermore, while increasing the contribution rate does improve outcomes, a significant share of members would still not reach a basic standard of living in retirement.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

New Zealand is an expensive country, Reserve Bank chief economist Paul Conway says, with many products priced well above the OECD average.

And some things – such as construction services, household utilities and some food items – are among the most expensive in the OECD.

Conway spoke to the National Financial Advisers Conference in Auckland on Wednesday.

He said inflation had been one of the most obvious economic disruptions over the past few years, particularly over the pandemic, when demand combined with a lack of supply sent inflation soaring at the sharpest rate in decades.

He said people were still asking why everything felt so expensive, even though inflation was much nearer the Reserve Bank’s targets than it had been.

Conway said, since the start of the pandemic, overall prices had risen by 26 percent and the price of some essentials had increased much more.

Wages rose 32 percent but that increase was probably not evenly felt – people who moved jobs were more likely to have received larger wage increases.

Conway said that for the past five years, one or more of a range of everyday household essentials that were hard to avoid had been increasing strongly in price at almost every point. “That included prices for council rates, construction services, some foods – including meat and butter, and insurance.

“Because households cannot easily avoid some of these costs, this has no doubt added to the sense of a ‘cost-of-living crisis’.”

Rates, insurance and gas had jumped particularly in recent years.

Tobacco products were among the most expensive in the OECD and milk, cheese, eggs and fruit prices were well above the average. Seafood, clothing, and meat were slightly below average.

“For services, the price of construction in New Zealand is the highest in the OECD and more than double the average. This is undoubtedly a handbrake on housing and infrastructure development here. In fact, the price of ‘capital formation’ – which covers machinery, equipment and construction – is 70 percent above average in New Zealand and also the highest in the OECD. The price of housing services and utilities in New Zealand is also assessed as being the most expensive in the OECD.”

He said low and stable inflation mattered for the cost of living but it was not the whole story.

Monetary policy – such as the official cash rate set by the Reserve Bank – could help to anchor prices but not make New Zealand affordable on its own. He acknowledged that inflation ended 2025 just above the Reserve Bank’s 1 percent to 3 percent target band and was likely to be more elevated because of the Middle East conflict.

He said what mattered for households was their purchasing power.

Before 2020, the purchasing power of wages in New Zealand was growing faster than the OECD average on the back of strong employment growth and favourable terms of trade.

“Today, while wage purchasing power is around average across all 38 OECD members countries, it is about 20 percent below the average of the more advanced OECD economies that we typically compare ourselves to.”

Productivity the key

For there to be continued sustained improvements in purchasing power, there would have to be more productivity, he said.

Real per capita income in New Zealand was below the OECD average, he noted. It had been about 80 percent of the average until the mid-2000s then increased to more than 95 percent by 2020.

“Since 2020, real income in New Zealand has fallen back to around 90 percent of the OECD average and the income gap vis-à-vis Australia has widened. Purchasing power, as measured by real income, has not kept pace with the rest of the OECD nor Australia since the beginning of the pandemic.”

Wages had declined less compared to the OECD average and were at best average, he said.

“Importantly, this is compared to all 38 current OECD member countries, which includes several emerging economies. Compared to the 30 OECD member countries in 2010, average incomes in New Zealand sit around 20 percent below the average.”

He said productivity growth would be the single most powerful determinant of higher real incomes and better purchasing power over the long run.

“New Zealand’s productivity performance leaves much to be desired and has lagged other OECD economies. Further, productivity growth in the New Zealand economy fell significantly following the global financial crisis and has been negative in the wake of the pandemic.

“While low and stable inflation is a key ingredient in lifting productivity and improving purchasing power, it is insufficient on its own. By anchoring prices, monetary policy creates the conditions for growth. But sustained gains in purchasing power require structural improvements in the economy.”

Measures to improve resilience

He said a more fragmented and unpredictable global economy would raise the stakes for ensuring New Zealand’s structural policies were resilient, adaptive and fit for purpose.

“We are in a new era of heightened geopolitical risk and persistent uncertainty, with the conflict in the Middle East a timely reminder of how quickly geopolitics can disrupt the global economy. At the same time, cross-country flows of trade, capital, and people are shifting, governments are becoming more interventionist, and the rules-based order that once underpinned global integration has weakened considerably.

“This is not a temporary shock that we can simply wait out. It’s a durable shift that makes the global economy more difficult and dangerous for small economies like New Zealand. We are more exposed to external shocks, fragile global supply chains, and shifts in global rules and norms over which we have little control.”

He said sustaining living standards would depend on structural policy settings that built resilience into the structure of the economy by encouraging flexibility, investment and adaption.

“A more resilient and flexible economy would mean monetary policy does not have to work as hard, or be as aggressive, to stabilise inflation as shocks wash through the economy.

“While monetary policy plays a critical role in responding to shocks, it cannot solve New Zealand’s ‘cost-of-living crisis’. Low and stable inflation underpins economic stability and is critical for sustained gains in purchasing power. But monetary policy does not create prosperity directly. It creates the conditions in which prosperity can endure.

“Improving the purchasing power of New Zealand households requires improved productivity. Productivity gains support stronger real wage growth, while competitive markets help keep price increases in check… stronger productivity raises the economy’s speed limit – allowing faster growth without inflation. A more resilient and flexible economy also means monetary policy doesn’t need to be as aggressive to keep inflation stable when shocks hit.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Some Meridian customers have complained of increases in the cost of the power they use for their electric vehicles – but interest in electric cars overall is booming.

A number of EV owners have taken to social media to question increases in the power company’s Electric Vehicle Power Plan.

One was told that when his plan renewed on 1 May he would be put on a new fixed rate plan, which would mean more than 50 percent increases on the day and night rates, and a 30 percent increase on the daily fixed charge.

Another said the increase could add hundreds to his monthly power bill.

Meridian said some customer plans were changing.

“Our EV plan offers a fixed rate for two years and we recently communicated with some customers whose term is coming to an end about their new offer. As you know, beyond our own costs there have also been substantial increases from lines and distribution networks over the last couple of years and this is another flow-on effect of that.”

Mike Casey, chief executive of Rewiring Aotearoa, said he had been contacted by people about the changes, too.

“What is driving these increasing costs is probably not actually Meridian themselves, but the cost to transport the electrons or the power from the power plants all the way to your home, and that’s namely the poles and wires.

“What we’ve seen very recently is the Commerce Commission allowing for much higher expenditure and much higher charging of customers for the maintenance and the growth of our poles and wire network in New Zealand.”

He said it would have been nice if the power company had “read the room a little bit” in the context of fuel prices increasing quickly.

“We have a really big opportunity here to convert a lot of drivers over to electric, and the news that energy into electric vehicles is also going up isn’t really what we want to be hearing right now.

“We want to be trying to encourage as many drivers into electric vehicles as possible because they will save a lot of money.

“The key thing here is even with the prices going up, the savings potential is absolutely huge. All this increase in Meridian’s prices are absolutely dwarfed by what’s going on the fossil fuel market at the moment, so I hope that New Zealanders, even though they see price rises on both options, that they realise how small one price rise is compared to the other price rise at the moment.”

He said charging an electric vehicle off the normal grid would cost the equivalent of about $1.50 a litre. “If you charge an electric vehicle off your rooftop with your solar, you’re probably paying close to $1.15 a litre … compared to what $3.30, $3.50 a litre, whatever it might be at the moment, you can see there’s still incredible savings by going electric.”

Westpac New Zealand managing director of institutional and business banking Reuben Tucker said demand for electric vehicles through the bank’s greater choices home loan top up and other loans for electric vehicles had soared.

“In the last two weeks the number of applications for EVs through these products has roughly doubled,” he said.

“We’re the only bank to offer interest-free lending on EVs and chargers, which is a key way we can help customers manage higher living costs not just now but in case of future events.”

Trade Me said people were also motivated to look for ways to become independent with their homes.

Searches for “off-grid” properties were up 68 percent year-on-year in the last month.

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand