Category: Politics

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Labour Party would offer doctors and nurse practitioners low-interest loans to set up new practices or buy into existing ones, if elected next year.

Leader Chris Hipkins made the announcement at the party’s annual general meeting in central Auckland on Sunday afternoon.

He said Labour would provide up to 50 loans each year, prioritising areas that had no general practitioners, or practices with closed or partially closed books.

Doctors could apply for loans of up to 90 percent of the cost of buying into a practice, capped at $500,000.

The loans would only be available for owner-operated general practices, with corporate-owned clinics excluded.

They would be interest-free for the first two years, with monthly repayments beginning on the outstanding balance at an annual interest rate of three percent.

The policy would give doctors up to 10 years to repay the loan and each doctor couold only receive one loan under the scheme.

Hipkins said the loans would be available from 1 July 2027, through the existing Small Business Cashflow Loan Scheme.

“This is a practical, targeted way to boost locally-owned clinics across New Zealand and strengthen the ones we already have,” he said. “More doctors in our communities means shorter waits for patients.

“Nearly 650,000 New Zealanders can’t afford to see their doctor when they need to and many others wait too long for an appointment.

“This announcement builds on our plan for three free doctor’s visits, improvements to GP funding and free cervical screening – all aimed at making it easier for people to get care when they need it.”

Hipkins said the policy would compliment his party’s plan to free up 4.5 million doctor’s appointments every year.

“The number of doctor-owned practices is falling, as is the number of doctors who work in doctor-owned practices,” he said. “It’s expensive to start a new practice or buy into an existing one, so our low-interest loans will give doctors the kickstart they need to get established.

“Two-thirds of practice owners and partners are intending to retire in the next 10 years, so it’s vital we can support the next generation to keep the doors and books open.

“This scheme is just one way Labour can help ensure healthcare is there where you need it, when you need it.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Waitangi Tribunal has found the Crown’s decision to exclude the Treaty from a draft geothermal development strategy would be a Treaty breach.

The strategy was developed by the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment with the aim of doubling New Zealand’s geothermal energy by 2040.

Minister for Māori Development and Minister for Māori Crown Relations Tama Potaka, Minister for RMA Reform Chris Bishop and Minister for Resources Shane Jones were involved in the draft.

On 7 November the Waitangi Tribunal held a discrete hearing on the Crown’s draft geothermal development strategy ‘From the Ground Up – A draft strategy to unlock New Zealand’s geothermal potential’.

It was revealed that in the hearing, Jones noted an objective to finalise the strategy later this year for Cabinet approval.

The Waitangi Tribunal said in its report most of the claimants at the hearing supported the draft strategy and it was a promising initiative for Māori economic development.

But the Tribunal noted the strategy also raised a number of issues, and called on the Crown to take the time to strengthen the strategy with Māori, noting specific actions for economic development in the action plan remained significantly underdone.

The Tribunal found that protection was not integrated in the action plan.

“On the specific issue of kaitiakitanga, the report notes that the Treaty principle of active protection requires the Crown to actively protect taonga, and that this is a particularly serious issue in a strategy designed to double geothermal energy in 15 years.

“The Tribunal further found that the strategy concerns the development of geothermal taonga of immense significance to Māori, the exercise by Māori of tino rangatiratanga and kaitiakitanga in respect of those taonga, and Crown-Māori cooperation on a major economic development platform.

“The Tribunal therefore found that the Crown’s decision to exclude the Treaty from the strategy would be a Treaty breach.

“The Tribunal did not consider this exclusion reasonable when the same Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment team and minister included the Treaty in the Minerals Strategy seven months earlier.

“In particular, the Tribunal found that the Treaty partnership, which requires the utmost good faith and mutual respect of each other’s authority, should be reflected in any strategy aimed at the Crown and Māori working together to achieve important outcomes.”

Another concern raised was that the Crown incorrectly characterised geothermal taonga in the strategy as ‘surface features’, such as geysers.

The report said this would breach the Treaty unless the definition was corrected, but there was still time to make amendments before the strategy was finalised.

The Tribunal also noted few specific opportunities in the strategy for iwi and hapū as distinct from Māori landowners.

The report stated the issue of Māori rights and interests, in particular the question of Māori customary title or ownership issues, needed to be addressed.

As this interim report was released part way through the Tribunal’s hearings, the Tribunal said it was not yet in a position to make findings on these issues.

The Tribunal welcomed the Crown’s inclusion of an action to consider the findings and recommendations of its stage 3 report, when this was released.

The report said that for time being, the Crown should engage directly with the groups who hold those rights.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

US diplomats have yet to raise the matter of migration with New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) after being directed to do so by the Trump administration.

A New York Times report on Wednesday said US embassies in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand had been instructed to pressure their governments to heavily restrict migration.

Ambassadors and their staff were advised to “regularly engage host governments and their respective authorities to raise US concerns about violent crimes associated with people of a migration background”, according to the Times.

In a statement to RNZ, an MFATspokesperson said: “There has been no such engagement.”

1News also reported comments from an unnamed US State Department official expressing concern that liberal democracies were signing up to “the globalised migration narrative”.

“The idea that you can just import large amounts of people from a different culture – a radically different culture even – and assume that everything will be fine and hunky dory when case studies have shown that that isn’t the case,” the official told 1News.

“It’s a risk that we see potentially affecting New Zealand as time goes on.”

Speaking earlier this week, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said New Zealand’s immigration policy would be decided by New Zealanders.

“New Zealand has an outstanding immigration system,” he said. “We have good control of our borders. We don’t have problems like I observe in other countries around the world with illegal immigration.”

Luxon told reporters he was very proud of New Zealand’s policy and the many immigrants who had made New Zealand home.

“They’ve made New Zealand a much better place.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

New Zealand was once a world leader in getting people to give up cigarettes, but we seem to have pulled up the brakes

In 34 days we hit the deadline for our world-leading ambitions to get our smoking rate down to less than five percent of the population.

To reach that Smokefree 2025 target we need 120,000 people to quit smoking pretty much immediately.

“That’s about 63,000 Māori, 21,000 Pasifika, 35,000 Europeans needed to quit,” says Chris Bullen, Auckland University public health professor and a leading researcher in the smokefree Aotearoa sector.

We’re not going to make it, but have we failed?

It depends on who you are, says Bullen.

“It’s come down and spectacularly so for certain populations,” he says.

Pākehā women living in high income suburbs have already reached the goal – that demographic is well below five percent.

For Māori it is three times the five percent target, Pasifika smokers are double the desired number.

Should we aim for Smokefree 2030?

Today, The Detail looks at why we missed the goal, the impact of this government’s removal of smokefree protections introduced by the previous Labour government under the Smokefree Action Plan, and what is next in the tobacco control battle.

When Smokefree 2025 was launched around 2011/2012 after a recommendation from the Māori Affairs Selection Committee, around 16.4 percent of adult New Zealanders smoked.

The latest figures from the annual NZ Health Survey show that figure is now 6.8 percent, similar to the previous year but down from 11.9 percent in 2019/20.

Some say we should celebrate what we’ve achieved, and they rubbish the latest rankings in the Global Tobacco Industry Interference Index, which has seen us plummet from second to 53rd place.

But dig into the numbers and they reveal deep inequities with Māori smoking rates at 15 percent and Pasifika at 10.3 percent.

“It’s an absolute failure and I think the present government’s been particularly bad in doing it,” says Anaru Waa, associate professor at Otago University based in Wellington. His research focuses on how we can eliminate tobacco-related harm among whānau Māori.

He’d like to see our Smokefree aim shifted out to 2030, and for it to be not just smoke-free but nicotine-free, because of all the new nicotine products on the market.

Bullen says the launch of Smokefree 2025 around 13 years ago was a breakthrough.

“It was an important lesson for me was that setting goals and targets can be very powerful,” says Bullen. “But it was also a lesson in that it seemed so far away, that for politicians on a three-year electoral cycle it was somebody else’s issue to grapple with.”

“So I guess they thought they’d just get a free ride because smoking was going out of fashion and by 2025 it would be a thing of the past. Of course it’s not.”

Bullen says there’s been cross party support for the idea and ongoing tobacco tax increases and regulations such as smokefree cars and indoor spaces all add up to incremental changes.

“But it was not until Ayesha Verrell (former Labour Health Minister) took up the cause and said 2025 is almost upon us, we need to do something. And that’s where the action plan was promoted and became law, very briefly, until it was repealed when the coalition government took power.”

Labour’s Smokefree 2025 Action Plan included three key measures; banning the sale of cigarettes to anyone born after 2009, slashing the number of tobacco retailers and cutting 95 percent of the nicotine from cigarettes.

But before the measures came into force the legislation supporting them was repealed by the Coalition Government.

Bullen says the policy was supported by the majority of New Zealanders in polling and by the vast majority of healthcare professionals. The repeal mobilised protestors with placards to the streets.

He says the repeal cannot entirely be blamed for the failure to hit the Smokefree target across the population but it sent a subtle message to smokers, “to say, you know our foot’s gone off the accelerator pedal, maybe it’s not so bad”.

The removal of targets for GPs and hospitals to give brief advice and support to people to quit smoking, also had an impact.

“Different governments do these things for various other reasons but that has had a measurable decline in the number of referrals coming to smoking cessation services from GPs.

“The whole system has to work together and I don’t think we’ve had a co ordinated, focussed system that’s really messaged loudly that we have got a goal as a nation and it’s something we can do collectively to support each other to get to that goal. That voice hasn’t been shouted loudly enough.”

The associate health minister Casey Costello has defended the government’s policies and called the Smokefree target ‘ambitious’. She has pointed to the latest figures that show that smoking among young people is below 3.2 percent as the best news.

“That’s exactly what we wanted our young people to see. We wanted our young people not to start,” she has said.

But Anaru Waa says New Zealand’s policies are not keeping up with the new products that are constantly being developed by the tobacco industry designed to hook young people.

“Nicotine drinks, nicotine gummy bears, you name it, just shove nicotine in it and you’ve got a hooked population.

“These aren’t nicotine replacement therapies with low nicotine ….. nicotine is a very highly addictive drug and the industries are awfully good at making it palatable and easy to get addicted to very quickly, then you tend to have the addiction for life.”

He says to achieve the Smokefree goal the measures that were scrapped by this government need to be returned but he also wants strict policies to extend further to products including vapes, with the ultimate aim of shutting out the tobacco industry.

“For some people who can’t quit it (vaping) might be an alternative but we also know that most of the people taking up vapes are youth and young adults and a lot of them have never smoked at all.

“These are the new generation of people using nicotine products and I’m thinking in 20 or 30 years time they’ll wonder why they were thrown under the bus at a time we could have prevented that.”

Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Parliament’s Justice Committee has released its report into the Electoral Amendment Bill.

The select committee recommended the bill be passed by majority, but suggested some amendments.

The bill would prevent same-day enrolments, establishing a deadline of 13 days before election day for people to enrol or update their details.

It would also ban prisoners from voting, and tighten up the rules around treating. Postal requirements for voting will also be removed.

The bill had its first reading in July.

The committee proposed “transitional arrangements” for prisoner voting, so that disqualification would only apply to all prisoners detained for a sentence of three years or more, and prisoners sentenced to less than three years whose relevant offence occurred after the bill’s commencement.

This, the committee said, would address situations where someone sentenced to less than three years’ offence may have been committed at a time when the law did not disqualify them.

The bill also allows for the introduction of automatic enrolment updates, so the Electoral Commission can update someone’s address directly following a data match.

The committee proposed amending the bill so the Electoral Commission needs to notify that person their address would be updated.

It also proposed an amendment so Electoral Commission could remove someone’s name from the dormant role and register them as an elector, if it is satisfied they should be registered.

In its differing view on the bill, Labour said the government’s suggestion the bill was necessary to improve the timeliness, efficiency, integrity, and resilience of elections was “a fiction” and the bill would role back one of the most accessible voting systems in the world.

“Much of this legislation has the effect of suppressing voting. We are deeply concerned that many people will be unable to vote at the next election and either be refused access to the ballot box, or have their vote disallowed because they did not appropriately update their enrolment before voting commenced. If this occurs there is a real risk that the legitimacy of the outcome of the election will be undermined.”

The Green Party also considered it “concerning” that the flexibility would be removed.

“Voting habits for life are formed during these formative years so if our election settings are permissive of the busyness and chaos of everyday life, particularly for young people, this will have flow-on, lifelong effects.”

The Greens also opposed the prisoner voting ban in the strongest possible terms.

“When a person is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, they relinquish their freedom of movement. People in custody do not relinquish their human rights, nor their civic rights, or any set of rights besides freedom of movement.”

Te Pāti Māori also opposed the bill, claiming it would “rig” the next election in the government’s favour.

“This bill will disproportionately impact our rangatahi, Māori, Pasifika, and Asian communities, and a majority of the disenfranchised voters would not support any of the government parties.”

Te Tai Tonga MP Tākuta Ferris said the expansion of treating offences was “criminalising tikanga” and the earlier enrolment deadline “ignores the lived realities of Māori voters”.

In July, Attorney-General Judith Collins found the bill to be inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act, and indicated 100,000 or more people could be directly or indirectly disenfranchised by the rules banning enrolment in the final 13 days before an election.

Collins also found the blanket disqualification from registration for people in prison would disenfranchise people who had a right to vote, and could not be justified.

The government, however, is pressing ahead, with the Prime Minister and Justice Minister both of the view that being a member of society comes with rights and responsibilities.

The committee received 2738 written submissions on the bill, from 2708 submitters.

The Ministry of Justice found 80.2 percent of submitters opposed the bill, with 0.5 percent supporting it.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Labour leader Chris Hipkins says he’s confident his party has changed enough since the 2023 election to win next year’s contest.

Speaking to RNZ before Labour’s annual general meeting in Auckland on Friday night, Hipkins said the party was shifting from reviewing policy to campaign mode.

“The focus for us now is to really get onto a campaign footing. We’ve been consolidating after the last election, we’ve been reviewing all our policy.

“We’re largely through that process now and so now we’re really getting onto a campaign footing and getting ready to win the election next year.”

The party went back to the policy drawing board after voters emphatically voted it out off the back of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Roughly one year out from next year’s election, Labour had so far presented the electorate with a pared back policy platform.

It includes a New Zealand Future Fund, a gaming rebate and a capital gains tax to fund three free GP visits and cervical screening.

This time last year, Hipkins told Labour’s membership the electorate had voted for change in 2023, and the party would have to change to win it back.

“The policy announcements that we’ve made already are very different from the sorts of things we were talking about in government last time,” he said this week.

Casting his mind back to 2023, Hipkins said he had laid down his conditions on staying on as leader just four days after the bruising election result.

“I said to the team pretty clearly, if you want me to stay as the leader, one of the conditions for that is going to be that we are going to work cohesively together as a team and I will be focused on making sure that happens, and that’s exactly what has happened.”

Hipkins successfully pitched its long-awaited capital gains tax in October, though he was pushed to do so earlier than planned after details were leaked to RNZ.

It was hardly the start the party would have wanted for such a contentious policy, though Hipkins said the idea seemed to have landed well.

“We worked through the capital gains tax policy very, very carefully to make sure that what we were putting before the electorate was something that people could understand the need for and they could understand how it would work and it’s landed very well with the New Zealand public.

“Our work on the three free doctors visits, similarly, went through a very thorough process so that we could be confident that we could deliver on that commitment.”

Labour’s policy platform as it stood was one big bottom line for the party, he said.

“These are things that we will deliver on in government,” he said.

Labour has capitalised on voter disillusionment with the coalition, leading National on the cost of living, health, the economy and housing in the latest IPSOS Issues Monitor survey.

However on current polling numbers it couldn’t go it alone and would need the support of the Greens and Te Pāti Māori

Hipkins had been keeping the Māori Party at arms length ever since internal ructions began and had since laid out his party’s intention to contest all of the Māori seats.

“I think Te Pāti Māori has got themselves into a world of difficulty. They’re not in any fit shape to play a constructive role in the current Parliament, much less a future government.

“And that’s one of the reasons that we’re going to be out there to win every one of those Māori seats back at the next election. I know Māori voters want a change of government at the next election, and my message to them is, voting Labour guarantees you a change of government.”

Voters would have to wait until next year to learn more about Labour’s policy platform heading into the election, with only small fry ideas to come in 2025.

“There’s a little bit more to come. They’re not major announcements but they will colour in a few of the blanks for people,” Hipkins said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

New Zealand’s biggest navy ship HMNZS Aotearoa has made a trip through the sensitive Taiwan Strait.

The Strait is part of the South China Sea, over which several countries, including China and the Philippines, have contested territorial claims.

Reuters reported Chinese forces tracked and followed the ship.

Defence Minister Judith Collins said the supply vessel had been on deployment since September after having maintenance done in Singapore.

It sailed through the Strait on 5 November on its way to the North Asian region to take part in UN monitoring of sanctions against North Korea.

Collins said all actions during the transit had been safe, professional and consistent with international law.

That included exercising the right to freedom of navigation, as guaranteed under the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea.

“The NZDF conducts all activities in accordance with international law and best practice. By doing this, we are demonstrating our commitment to the international rules-based system in our near region – the Indo-Pacific”.

The Aotearoa also sailed through the Strait last year in September. The minister said at the time it was with an Australian ship as part of routine activity.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Finance Minister Nicola Willis has urged banks to slash their home loan rates by passing on “as much as possible” of the latest cut to the official cash rate (OCR).

Banks began dropping floating rates on Wednesday after the Reserve Bank cut the OCR by 25 basis points, as expected, to 2.25 percent, the lowest since June 2022.

Speaking in Auckland on Thursday, Willis said the Reserve Bank would monitor how banks responded to the OCR cut, but she hoped it would flow through to mortgage-holders.

“My message to the New Zealand banks is a very clear one: pass on as much as possible,” she said.

“When you do, that makes a significant difference to our economy. And actually, as some of New Zealand’s biggest businesses, you have a stake in this economy. So pass those rates on.”

In its forecasts released on Wednesday, the central bank said the risks for inflation were “balanced”.

Willis told reporters she expected the economy to pick up and inflation to come down even more next year, meaning a real difference to the cost-of-living.

“Conditions are going to get easier for a lot of New Zealand workers and families,” she said.

“All of the data and indicators I’m seeing tell me that next year will be a lot better.”

Willis accepted people were under “no obligation” to believe her analysis until they started feeling the improvement for themselves.

“New Zealanders have been very resilient,” she said. “Your efforts are not in vain… we have better times ahead of us.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Unions want the Prime Minister to step in and resolve their collective bargaining impasses, frustrated that progress is not being made.

The joint letter to Christopher Luxon was signed by the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, New Zealand Nurses Organisation, New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union, Post Primary Teachers’ Association, NZEI Te Riu Roa, and the Public Service Association.

“The recent strike action, rallies and marches is evidence of that frustration on the part of union members. At those rallies and marches there was a clear call for the government to listen to those workforces and to urgently make progress on the matters relating to those workforces and the bargaining,” the letter said.

“We believe that it is appropriate in these circumstances for the Prime Minister to step in and meet with the unions’ leaders to explore possible ways forward and settlement options. While there are different issues in each sector we see there is sufficient commonality across the bargaining to make that an appropriate step.”

The unions believed the prime minister’s intervention would mean the impasses could be moved on, and bargaining could be concluded satisfactorily for all parties.

The prime minister’s office confirmed to RNZ the letter had been received, and said the sender would be responded to directly.

More than 100,000 people walked off the job last month, despite rallies in some parts of the country not going ahead due to weather.

Last month, Luxon heavily criticised the organisers of the strike, saying it was “politically motivated” and he felt no need to meet with them.

“The negotiations, the terms and conditions, are done between the Public Service Commissioner doing the centralised bargaining and also the CEO of Health New Zealand, who are the employers, with the respective unions,” he said at the time.

The strike was held on the same day as former Prime Minister Jim Bolger’s funeral, which Luxon attended instead.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The coalition has officially missed its commitment to deliver 500 new police officers in the first two years in government.

But the minister responsible is defending the target, saying it had led to improvements across the recruitment process.

Thursday marks two years since the government was sworn in, three days after the signings of the coalition agreements.

New Zealand First and National’s coalition agreement contained a commitment to “training no fewer than 500 new frontline police within the first two years”.

A report from the Treasury in September to the finance minister showed September 2026 as the likely target for 500 additional officers, and that would still require significant catch-up.

Nicola Willis had requested a progress update “in light of public reporting on slow progress in meeting this target”, as well as information on how Police had used any underspends, and options for returning the funding if the target was not met.

The report said that given the measures Police had taken regarding attrition and recruitment, Police considered it remained “well-positioned” to achieve the target by mid-2026.

“Police has been reluctant to specify a specific month when it expects the target to be achieved but our analysis of the information provided by them suggests the target is likely to be reached in September 2026.”

The associate police minister and New Zealand First MP Casey Costello, who was delegated responsibility for the target, said ministers had always said recruitment was an operational responsibility for Police, and did not want to see any drop in standards in pursuit of the target.

Costello said the country had an “incredibly well-trained and quality” constabulary, with the highest number of frontline police in New Zealand’s history, and that since the government created the target there had been record numbers of applicants and recruits.

“The timing for 500 new frontline Police was ambitious, but the extra constables will be delivered and the target has driven improvements across the recruitment process, from marketing through to the creation of a new training facility in Auckland,” she said.

“Two years ago, there wasn’t a proper pipeline of applicants, with recruitment barely covering attrition rates. On top of that, to improve training standards, Police increased the length of training courses from 16 to 20 weeks soon after we became government so no wings graduated from February to May 2024. This meant that the number of Police actually declined until then.”

The Treasury document showed Police also had a $7.915 million underspend in 2024-25, the majority of which came from the delays in meeting the target.

Of that, $5.537m was moved to the 2025-26 budget to keep meeting the costs of the target, with the remaining $2.378m moved to the overall Police pot.

Police had sought to address recruitment and attrition issues by reducing the time spent in the recruitment pipeline before training, with the overall timeline reducing from 20 months to 12.

Police had also increased training wing capacity from 80 to 100, including a new facility in Auckland.

“Police is unlikely to be able to speed up delivery of the target given it already appears to have taken measures to speed up recruitment,” the document said.

Police had allowed for attrition at around 5.8 percent in its planning to meet the target – higher than the decade long average of 4.5 percent per year.

Attrition had peaked at around 5.9 percent in the 12 months to December 2024, and dipped to 5.4 percent in the 12 months to August 2025.

Police attributed that higher than usual attrition to an ageing workforce, and campaigns from Australia targeting New Zealand staff.

Costello said attrition rates had reduced below 5 percent, and there was a strong recruitment pipeline in place, with 80 recruits set to graduate in December.

Total graduate numbers in 2025 are expected to be between 750 and 770, compared to 617 in 2023 and 562 in 2024.

“Overall, Police will have brought in approximately 900 new constables – graduates through the Police College and re-joins – during 2025. This will be the most ever achieved in a year,” Costello said.

Labour’s police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the government had “clearly failed” its promise, saying it had been pushed from November 2025 to June 2026, then August, and now September.

“It’s always good to have as many recruits as possible, and it’s great to have recruitment campaigns in place. But I think the problem is, if New Zealanders have been told that they’re going to have 500 more police in place by the 27th of November, then there is a clear expectation that the government should deliver on that promise, and they’ve failed to do that.”

Andersen said the Police Minister Mark Mitchell had known “from the get-go” that two years was going to be difficult.

“This has caused clear tensions in the coalition agreement, but the failure to deliver those extra police officers just puts more pressure on an already stretched front line.”

Acting Deputy Commissioner Tusha Penny said as at 17 November, there were 313 recruits currently under training, and Police had 10,449 constable full-time equivalents.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand