More than 900 health graduates to receive financial boost through bonding scheme

Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

More than 900 newly qualified health professionals are set to receive financial support to kick-start their careers, Health Minister Simeon Brown says.

“The Government is committed to growing and strengthening our health workforce, and retaining health professionals is a key part of that,” Mr Brown says.

“We want more of our nurses, midwives, anaesthetic technicians, and other critical health professions to stay in New Zealand after they graduate.

“The Voluntary Bonding Scheme provides financial incentives to encourage new graduates to stay and work in the country – particularly in hard-to-staff regions and specialities where they’re needed most.”

The scheme, which was launched under the previous National government, was expanded in 2024 to include new and recent graduate anaesthetic technicians and pharmacists. It offers after-tax payments ranging from $14,165 to $50,000 over a bonding period of three to five years, depending on the profession.

The 2024 intake of 925 graduates includes: 

  • 477 registered and enrolled nurses
  • 172 midwives
  • 77 anaesthetic technicians
  • 70 rural and regional general practice trainees
  • 48 pharmacists
  • 23 dentists
  • 22 oral health therapists
  • 20 radiation therapists
  • 15 Sonographers
  • One medical physicist

“We are relentlessly focused on ensuring Kiwis have access to timely, quality healthcare in the community.

“The scheme is a practical way to build and strengthen key parts of our health workforce, particularly in areas and specialities that face the greatest recruitment challenges.

“We know there is further work needed to improve access to primary care and boost the primary care workforce, which will be the focus of the intake for 2025.

“This builds on the primary care package announced in March, including:

  • 100 clinical placements for overseas-trained doctors in primary practice.
  • Recruitment incentives for up to 400 graduate nurses annually for five years to work in primary practice.
  • 100 additional doctor training places over the course of this Government at our medical schools.
  • Up to 50 graduate doctors training in primary care annually.
  • Up to 120 training places for nurse practitioners in primary care.
  • Accelerated tertiary education for up to 120 primary care nurses. 

“I want to congratulate the most recent cohort of graduates who are entering the scheme and will be working in vital health roles across the country,” Mr Brown says.

Progress on Mill Road Stage One

Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

Transport Minister Chris Bishop has welcomed the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board’s endorsement of the investment case for Stage One of Mill Road, a crucial Road of National Significance.

The Board has endorsed the investment case and approved $91.1 million for completing the design work and securing consents on Stage One.

“South Auckland is the fastest growing area in the Auckland region, with 120,000 more people expected to make it their home over the next 30 years. We need to get on and deliver crucial transport infrastructure that supports that kind of growth, reduces congestion, improves safety, and helps unlock housing,” Mr Bishop says.

“Mill Road is one of 17 Roads of National Significance (RoNS) this Government is progressing, and the NZTA Board’s endorsement of the investment case and approval of design and consent funding for Stage 1 is a direct result of our focus to streamline the business case process and get projects into delivery faster.

The investment case for Mill Road Stage 1 (Manukau to Alfriston) includes:

  • Four lane (general traffic) corridor including a westbound bus lane at the northern end.
  • Two new and six upgraded intersections between SH1 interchange and Murphys Road.
  • Three new roundabouts.
  • New bridges across Puhinui Creek and Cheesman’s Bush.
  • Current Mill Road south of Redoubt Road becomes a shared path and property access road.

“Delivering Mill Road Stage 1 has substantial benefits, including a 30 percent reduction in congestion on the corridor, over 60 percent reduction in deaths and serious injuries, and by 2031, 25 percent faster journey times.

“The endorsement of the investment case and approval of design and consent funding for Stage 1 provides certainty on the next steps as the project moves to complete the design and technical work necessary for construction to begin as early as mid-2026.

“In order to deliver benefits for the people, communities and businesses of South Auckland as soon as possible, NZTA are planning on dividing the construction of Stage 1 in different construction packages so they can start work sooner in places where there is more certainty around the existing environment.

“Mill Road Stage 1 covers a range of different environments, including sections that are highly urban, through to rural areas, as well as locations that require more technical assessments to determine the most appropriate design and construction methods.

“The plan is to focus on Stage 1b from Hollyford Drive to Hilltop Road, along with a piece of work to the south (Stage 1d), which includes roundabout improvements around the Mill Road Alfriston area. Stage 1a between State Highway 1 (SH1) and Hollyford Drive and Stage 1c from Hilltop Road to north of Alfriston will be delivered later.

“Mill Road has a long history, including a confirmed designation for Stage 1 obtained in 2016. NZTA is working at pace to build on earlier designs with a focus on improving the efficiency and resilience of the corridor, and increasing capacity to deliver faster, more reliable journey times. The project will also seek to obtain statutory approvals, likely via the Fast Track Approvals Act, and this will be confirmed in coming months.

“Technical work to secure the route protection and other approvals for future Stages 2 and 3 is scheduled to begin from mid-2026.

“The Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024 (GPS) also requires NZTA to consider tolling for all new RoNS. The investment case confirms tolling is possible and the revenue will support the construction and maintenance of the road. If tolled, Mill Road Stage 1 has a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of 2.2, and un-tolled the BCR is 3.1. The Government will consider this recommendation and announce next steps of the process in due course.

“The investment case for Mill Road Stage 1 has shown it represents a strong case for investment delivering substantial benefits. Taking a staged approach to delivery and spreading investment over multiple National Land Transport Programme (NLTP) periods, helps focus delivery of priority benefits sooner, and delivers a strong pipeline of work for the construction sector into the future.

“NZTA recently opened a Registration of Interest (ROI) for the first package of technical works, which will help move Stage 1 closer to construction.

“South Auckland is the fastest growing area in the region, and we need to get on and deliver transport infrastructure that supports this growth. I want to thank local MPs Hon Judith Collins, Rima Nakhle and Hon Simeon Brown for their advocacy of this important project, and I know we all look forward to seeing more progress in the months and years ahead as Mill Road Stage 1 moves into construction as soon as possible.”

For more information about the project on the NZTA website here: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/south-auckland-projects/mill-road/

Notes to Editor:

Key features of the Stage 1 design include:

  • Two lanes in each direction, including a westbound bus lane from Everglade Drive to SH1 interchange
  • New intersections at Alexia Place and Bartells Drive
  • Signalisation of the intersections at Diorella Drive, Goodwood Drive, Hilltop Road and Murphys Road
  • Upgraded signals at the Hollyford Drive and Everglade Drive intersection
  • Roundabouts to connect parts of the new Mill Road with Redoubt Road, Ranfurly Road and Alfriston Road
  • New bridges across Puhinui Creek and Cheesman’s Bush
  • Original Mill Road south of Redoubt Road to become a shared path and property access road only

Project outcomes

  • Economic benefits: less congestion and quicker journey times, supporting economic growth and productivity (by 2031, 25% faster journey times, 3 mins quicker Alfriston to SH1 in the morning peak, 7 mins quicker SH1 to Alfriston in the evening peak. 30% reduction in congestion on the corridor).
  • Safety improvements: reduced crash risk at intersections connecting the corridor and local roads (over 60% reduction in deaths and serious injuries).
  • Network resilience: viable alternative to SH1 during unplanned incidents, supporting faster network recovery across the region and reducing economic impact.
  • Improved experience: greater reliability for all users, reducing frustration during unexpected delays

Record growth in research and development to drive a stronger economy

Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Dr Shane Reti has welcomed a significant milestone in New Zealand’s research and development (R&D) sector, with new figures showing total expenditure on R&D has climbed to $6.4 billion – a 21 per cent increase since 2022.

Dr Reti says the strong rise in R&D expenditure demonstrates growing momentum and reflects the Government’s commitment to backing science, innovation and technology as core drivers of economic growth and supports its global trade and investment agenda.

“Using new ideas, knowledge and technology to develop better ways of doing things helps the New Zealand economy grow,” Dr Reti said.

“R&D is how we lift productivity and create high-value jobs. It’s also critical to opening opportunities in global export markets, helping build a resilient economy that can thrive on the world stage.”

According to data released by Stats NZ today, between 2022 and 2024, the business, government, and higher education sectors reported:

  • Total R&D expenditure rose to $6.4 billion – up 21 per cent since the 2022 survey
  • Average R&D expenditure per entity increased 24 per cent to $2.8 million – an average increase of $524,000
  • The number of R&D FTEs increased by 9 per cent to 42,000
  • R&D expenditure as a proportion of GDP rose from 1.49 per cent to 1.54 per cent

“These figures show the depth and intensity of investment has strengthened. That’s a positive trend toward smarter, more focused innovation.

In the business sector, R&D expenditure reached $4.0 billion in 2024 – a 9 percent year-on-year increase. The number of R&D FTEs remained stable at 21,000, while the average R&D spend per business rose by nearly 9 percent to $1.8 million.

Businesses reported that their top motivations for investing in R&D were to gain access to new markets and to maintain their market position.

“Having businesses investing more in technology and innovation will create higher-paying jobs for New Zealanders and diversify our economy into new industries and global markets,” Dr Reti says.

“Science, innovation and technology is a key pillar in our Government’s plan to grow our economy.

“It will not only create more jobs, increase incomes and provide more opportunities at home in New Zealand but also enable additional international trade and investment – something the Government is actively pursuing, including through international trade agreements like those with the UAE and GCC.

“We’re making deliberate choices to back science, innovation and technology as powerful enablers of productivity and opportunity across the board.”

Better compensation for scam victims

Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

Banks have responded to the Government’s expectation to better protect Kiwi consumers from scams by introducing stronger safeguards and a compensation scheme, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson says.

“New commitments from banks mean that if a bank fails to adequately warn and protect a consumer from a scam, they will reimburse the victim up to $500,000,” Mr Simpson says.

“This is an important win for bank customers, who have been advocating for some time for better recognition from banks of the role they play as the final gate between a consumer and a scammer.

“Last year the Government wrote to banks outlining our expectation that banks take greater responsibility for protecting Kiwi consumers. I am pleased that banks have responded to this directive and are updating their Code of Banking Practice with five new commitments to better protect customers, including pre-transaction warnings and identification of high-risk transactions. 

“Banks will also take a more active role in preventing scams, by participating in information sharing agreements across industry and government and educating people. Stopping scams before they happen is the best strategy.

“Online scams cause immense harm to our wider economy, as consumers lose confidence transacting online. The fear generated by scams runs directly counter to efforts to digitise our economy. 

“While people still need to remain vigilant and take responsibility for their own online safety, these changes will enable consumers to check a payment is legitimate before transferring money.

“I have been clear with banks that the journey doesn’t stop here. I expect banks to continue to prioritise security and adapt to the ever-evolving scams environment. 

“I have made similar expectations clear to telecommunications companies and digital platforms and look forward to progressing a cross-industry approach with them.

“Improving the safety and ease of doing business is part of our plan to grow the economy.”

Notes to editors:

The five commitments introduced to the New Zealand Banking Associate Code of Banking Practice include:

  • a Confirmation of Payee service for customers to check that the name of the person they are paying matches the account number, which has already commenced roll-out
  • pre-transaction warnings to consumers based on the payment purpose
  • identification of and response to high-risk transactions or unusual account transaction activity, and the ability to block or delay transactions in some cases
  • providing a 24/7 reporting channel for customers who think they’ve been scammed, and responding to protect accounts
  • sharing scammer account information with other banks to help prevent criminal activity, and freezing funds where appropriate

The updated Code comes into force on 30 November 2025. This is to allow the banks time to get all the protections in place.

Proposed updates to forest types and default carbon tables for exotic forests in the NZ Emissions Trading Scheme and other regulatory amendments

Source:

Updates

29 April 2025

Technical annex added

We published a technical annex that summarises the research supporting the proposed updates to the default carbon tables.

View the technical annex

23 April 2025

Registrations open for webinars and online hui

To support this consultation, we are running 2 webinars and 2 online hui. These sessions will provide an opportunity for you to ask questions and discuss the proposals. The online hui are dedicated sessions for whenua Māori to give feedback on the proposals. You must register to attend the webinars or hui. (The registration links are to a Zoom booking system called ‘Connect’).

Webinars

• 12pm on Friday 2 May: Register to attend

• 4pm on Tuesday 6 May: Register to attend

Hui

• 4pm on Monday 5 May: Register to attend

• 12pm on Wednesday 7 May: Register to attend

Have your say

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is consulting on changes to improve the default carbon tables for exotic forests in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS). Default carbon tables are used by small-scale forestry participants to calculate the carbon stored in their forests. We are also consulting on other technical regulatory amendments for forestry in the NZ ETS.

We want your feedback about the proposals – summaries are on this page and full details are in the discussion document.

You can send us your submission from 15 April until 5pm on 16 May 2025.

Discussion document

Proposed changes to forestry in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS)  [PDF, 2.1 MB]

Related documents

Evaluating the potential for a default carbon table for redwoods and an updated default table for the exotic softwoods forest type for use in the ETS summary report [PDF, 3.3 MB]

Section D: Technical report: Evaluating alternative carbon modelling and analysis models for redwoods [PDF, 2 MB]

Section E: Impacts of silviculture and coppicing on carbon stocks in redwoods [PDF, 3.3 MB]

Updated default tables for the exotic hardwoods forest type for use in the ETS [PDF, 2.7 MB]

Updating radiata pine carbon yield tables for use in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme [PDF, 3.6 MB]

Proposed updated and new default carbon tables in Excel format [XLSX, 86 KB]

Technical Annex: Summary of research supporting the proposed updates to the default carbon tables [PDF, 1.2 MB]

Introduction and summaries of the proposals

The Maximising Forest Carbon Programme aims to improve how we measure, recognise, and reward carbon storage in our native and exotic forests. One of the ways it will do this is by improving the accuracy of the default carbon tables.

Find out about Maximising Forest Carbon Programme

Summary of proposed changes to the default carbon tables for exotic forests

Participants with less than 100 hectares of forest land registered in the NZ ETS use the default carbon tables to calculate their forest’s carbon storage. The tables were developed in 2007–2008 using the best data available at the time but have not been meaningfully updated since.

Tree species in the NZ ETS are grouped into 5 forest types for carbon calculations. These are:

  • Pinus radiata (radiata pine)
  • Douglas-fir
  • exotic hardwoods
  • exotic softwoods
  • indigenous (native).

We are proposing updates to default carbon tables for the following types of exotic forest:

  • exotic softwoods
  • exotic hardwoods
  • Pinus radiata (radiata pine)

We’re also proposing to introduce a new forest type and default tables for redwoods. Redwoods are currently in the exotic softwoods forest type but under our proposals redwoods would be separated from exotic softwoods.

These improvements will help to ensure:

  • the forest types in the NZ ETS reflect the main types of forest grown in New Zealand
  • the default carbon tables provide robust carbon sequestration estimates
  • small-scale forestry participants are fairly rewarded for their carbon sequestration.

Summary of proposed regulatory amendments in the NZ ETS

Separate to the default tables proposals, we are also proposing some smaller amendments to the Climate Change (Forestry) Regulations 2022. These changes address technical issues. They are: 

  • clarifying whether young forests that fail to thrive should be considered first or subsequent rotation under averaging accounting
  • updating the deadline for the input calculator to align more closely to the deadline for emissions returns
  • streamlining the processing for transmissions of interest
  • simplifying the treatment of small areas
  • future-proofing the method of spatial measurement used for determining land area.

Making your submission

Send us your feedback on the proposals by 5pm on 16 May 2025.

You can submit feedback on the whole document, or just the areas relevant to you.

There are 3 ways you can make a submission – using an online form, or by emailing or posting your submission. 

Online

Complete our online submission form – Alchemer

Email or post

If you are sending us a submission by email or post, we encourage you to use the submission template. The submission template has the same questions as the online form.

Optional submission form template [DOCX, 120 KB]

When you have completed your submission, email it to etsforestrychanges@mpi.govt.nz

Or post it to:

Maximising Forest Carbon Programme
Te Uru Rākau – New Zealand Forest Service
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Include the title of the consultation document with your submission: Proposed changes to forestry in the NZ ETS.

Additionally, you may choose to include the following optional details:

  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

Providing this information is optional. If you do include it, it will help us gain more insights from your submission.

If you’d like more information, email etsforestrychanges@mpi.govt.nz

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Second notice of an application for a mātaitai reserve at southern Hokianga Harbour and adjoining waterways, Northland

Source:

Your views sought

Ngā tāngata kaitiaki ō Te Hikutū (Te Hikutū Hapū) has applied for a mātaitai reserve (“Te Mātaitai ō Te Hikutū”) in the southern part of the Hokianga Harbour, Northland.

Fisheries New Zealand invites submissions from persons having a fishing interest in the stock or stocks in the proposed mātaitai reserve.

Te Hikutū Hapū and Fisheries New Zealand have previously consulted the local community on the application.

Find out about the first consultation with the local community (closed 13 May 2024)

What’s being proposed?

The proposed area includes the fisheries waters within a portion of southern Hokianga Harbour extending approximately 500 metres from the mean high-water mark, between Koutu Point and the Whirinaki River mouth, and adjoining freshwater fisheries waters.

Te Hikutū Hapū amended the original proposed area following the first consultation with the local community.

Consultation documents

Map of proposed mātaitai [PDF, 2 MB]

Te Mātaitai ō Te Hikutū application [PDF, 9.3 MB]

Making your submission

Submissions close at 5pm on Monday 19 May 2025.

Email your submission to FMSubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

Fisheries management – Spatial allocations
Fisheries New Zealand
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Public notices about this consultation

Public notices about the call for submissions are scheduled to appear in the Northern Advocate and Northland Age on 3 April 2025.

About mātaitai reserves

A mātaitai reserve is an identified traditional fishing ground which tangata whenua have a special relationship with. Mātaitai reserves are limited to fisheries waters and do not include any land area. Mātaitai reserves do not change any existing arrangements for access to private land.

Mātaitai reserves also do not affect private landowners’ land titles, or their ability to exercise resource consents for such things as taking water or extracting gravel or sand. Resource consents are managed under the Resource Management Act 1991.

When a mātaitai reserve is established, the recreational fishing rules do not change. However, the Tangata Kaitiaki for a mātaitai reserve may propose changes to the rules at a later date.

Commercial fishing is prohibited in a mātaitai reserve but can be reinstated at the request of the Tangata Kaitiaki for the mātaitai reserve for specified species, quantity or time period.

Mātaitai reserves do not have an impact on whitebait or trout fishing.

Find out more about mātaitai reserves

Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998 – NZ Legislation

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Review of the Biosecurity (Meat and Food Waste for Pigs) Regulations 2005

Source:

Have your say

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is reviewing the regulations for feeding meat and food waste to pigs. The aim of the review is to reduce biosecurity risk and improve MPI’s ability to monitor compliance.

Requirements for feeding meat and food waste to pigs are in the Biosecurity (Meat and Food Waste for Pigs) Regulations 2005. The regulations provide important protection against exotic diseases entering New Zealand that would affect pigs and the livestock sector.

We want to hear your feedback about 4 options under consideration.

  1. Keep the status quo: meat food waste cannot be fed to pigs unless treated.
  2. Prohibit feeding food waste to pigs that contains meat (or has come into contact with meat).
  3. Require food waste producers to treat it before it can be distributed.
  4. Prohibit feeding any food waste to pigs.

Full explanations for each option are in the discussion document.

Discussion document

Reviewing the Biosecurity (Meat and Food Waste for Pigs) Regulations 2005 [PDF, 920 KB]

Related document

Biosecurity (Meat and Food Waste for Pigs) Regulations 2005 – NZ Legislation

Making your submission

Email your feedback on the discussion document and the options presented by Sunday 27 April 2025 to BiosecurityPartnerships.Policy@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can post written submissions to:

Biosecurity Partnerships and Regulatory Stewardship team
Food Waste for Pigs Consultation
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Proposed amendments to the New Zealand Food Notice: Maximum Residue Levels for Agricultural Compounds

Source:

Have your say

New Zealand Food Safety wants your feedback about changes to the New Zealand Food Notice: Maximum Residue Levels for Agricultural Compounds. The proposed changes include:

  • 2 new entries for maximum residue levels in Schedule 1
  • 12 amended entries for maximum residue levels in Schedule 1.

Full details are in the consultation document. Submissions close at 5pm on 16 May 2025.

Consultation document

Proposals to amend the New Zealand Food Notice: Maximum Residue Levels for Agricultural Compounds [PDF, 494 KB]

Related documents

WTO notification – NZL 783 – SPS notification – Proposals to Amend the Maximum Residue Levels [PDF, 203 KB]

Background information about MRLs

Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) are the maximum legal levels for residues of agricultural chemicals and veterinary medicines in food for sale in New Zealand. As new products and uses are registered, new MRLs are set and existing MRLs are adjusted as needed to ensure that residue levels remain as low as practicable without compromising the ability for the chemical to successfully do what is intended. Entries are also set and amended for compounds that do not require MRLs to manage residues in food.

The entries in the notice for MRLs and compounds for which MRLs do not apply are established for agricultural compounds to support Good Agricultural Practice in New Zealand while ensuring risks associated with food safety are effectively managed. MRLs may also be proposed to support the importation of food into New Zealand.

Making your submission

Email your feedback on the consultation document by 5pm on 16 May 2025 to ACVM.Consultation@mpi.govt.nz

For each compound you comment on, answer these questions:

  • Do you agree or disagree with the proposed addition or amendment?
  • Do you agree or disagree with the proposed MRL values?

While we prefer email, you can send your submission by post to:

MRL Amendments
New Zealand Food Safety
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140
New Zealand.

What to include

Make sure you tell us in your submission:

  • the title of the consultation document
  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Fisheries reform: proposed amendments to the Fisheries Act

Source:

Updates

12 March 2025 – Consultation extended 

The consultation has now been extended 2 more weeks. Send your feedback by 5pm on Friday 11 April 2025.

25 February 2025 – Presentation document added

Following the first session of the public online meeting on Monday 24 February 2025, the presentation document has been published.

See the presentation document

Have your say

Fisheries New Zealand wants your feedback on a package of proposals that will enhance value to fishers and better ensure sustainability. These proposed reforms will:

  • improve the responsiveness, efficiency, and certainty of decision-making
  • provide greater protection for on-board camera footage and ensure the on-board camera programme is workable
  • implement new rules for commercial fishers that set out when QMS (Quota Management System) fish must be landed and when they can be returned to the sea.

The consultation opened on 12 February and will close at 5pm on 11 April 2025.

Media release

Online public meetings

During the consultation period, we’ll be holding 4 public online meetings. At these sessions, we’ll give you a high-level presentation on the proposals and you’ll have a chance to ask questions.

  • Session 1 – Monday 24 February 2025, 6pm to 7pm
  • Session 2 – Monday 3 March 2025, 3pm to 4pm 
  • Session 3 – Thursday 13 March 2025, 3pm to 4pm
  • Session 4 – Wednesday 2 April 2025, 3pm to 4pm.

If you would like to attend one of the meetings, you must register.

Register for an online meeting – SurveyMonkey

We encourage you to read the consultation document before you attend.

Consultation document

Proposed amendments to the Fisheries Act 1996 [PDF, 2.4 MB]

Related documents

Proposed Amendments to the Fisheries Act Consultation Presentation 2025 [PDF, 482 KB]

Part 3 of the consultation document seeks input into how we plan to implement new rules for commercial fishers that set out when QMS species must be landed and when they can be returned to the sea. Further detail on one of the proposals is in the supplementary information document.

Proposed adjustments to Total Allowable Catch settings for stocks where a current landing exception is removed [PDF, 585 KB]

Fisheries reform work programme – Cabinet paper [PDF, 1.1 MB]

Proposed Changes to the Fisheries Act 1996 Consultation – Cabinet paper [PDF, 1 MB]

Why we’re making these changes

The Government has made commitments to lift New Zealand’s productivity and economic growth – increasing opportunities and prosperity for all New Zealanders, including the seafood sector.

We now have access to better quality and more frequent data through electronic reporting by fishers and verification of some of this data by onboard cameras and fisheries observers.

The proposed changes respond to the Government’s goals and take advantage of new data and analytical tools to improve how we manage New Zealand’s fisheries.

Making your submission

We must get your feedback by 5pm on Friday 11 April 2025. We’d prefer you used our online survey form but you can also email or post a submission. 

Email

Email your submissions to fish.reform@mpi.govt.nz

Post

Post your written submission to:

Fisheries Policy Team
Policy and Trade Branch
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526 Wellington 6140
New Zealand.

What to include in your email and postal submission

Make sure you tell us:

  • the title of the consultation document [‘Proposed amendments to the Fisheries Act 1996’]
  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Proposed changes to cost recovery settings: 2025 annual review

Source:

Have your say

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) seeks your feedback on increases to:

  • the Dairy Standards Processor Levy and the Dairy Exporter Levy
  • veterinary service fees for establishments
  • veterinary service fees for live animal imports and exports, including germplasm
  • the Raw Milk Levy
  • the Homekill Levy.

We’re also proposing 6 relatively small design changes to ensure appropriate charging for the services provided.

Summaries of the proposals are on this page and full details are in the consultation document.

Consultation opened on 5 February and we must get your submissions by 5pm on 7 March 2025.

Consultation document

Annual review 2025: Proposed changes to MPI’s cost recovery settings [PDF, 1.9 MB]

What’s being proposed?

Fee/levy Current rate Proposed rate

Dairy Standards Processor Levy total revenue per annum 

$4,279,580

$5,576,268

Dairy Exporter Levy revenue per annum 

$834,567

$1,541,334

Establishments fees (vets) per hour

$128.15

$152.42 or $155.80

Establishments fees (supervising vets) per hour

$136.45

$169.89 or $173.71

Veterinary service fees for live animal imports and exports, including germplasm per hour

$186.30

$216.84

Raw Milk Levy per annum

$581.25

2% increases per annum for 3 years.

$616.83 by 2027–28.

Homekill Levy per annum

$100

2% increases per annum for 3 years.

$106.12 by 2027–28.

Summaries of proposed regulatory design changes to 6 other cost recovery settings

1. Clearance of increased regulatory interest and high regulatory interest foods (for example, frozen berries)

Regulations currently include an administration activity fee for importing of increased regulatory interest food or high regulatory interest food. Under the regulations, charging is specified as being for “each consignment”. The administration activity is often done for groups of consignments, for example, where a group of consignments comes from a single origin, rather than for each consignment within that group. This saves time and reduces the bill for the importer. It is proposed to amend the regulations to clarify that charging is done for “each consignment or group of consignments of a single origin”.

2. Levy waiver relating to the former Meat Industry Initiative Fund

Regulations state amounts to be charged for a now-ended Meat Initiative Fund. A permanent waiver is in place so that these amounts are not actually charged. The design change proposes to replace the waiver with a change to the regulations to clarify that these charges have ceased.

3. Food export exemptions

It is proposed to add a new charge of $135 per application plus $33.75 per quarter hour beyond the first hour to recover the cost of the work undertaken by MPI officials to process exemption requests under section 347 of the Food Act 2014. For example, if food is destined solely for export, it should comply with standards in the destination market and could be given an exemption from meeting New Zealand standards where these differ from those prevailing in the destination market. The new fee will increase revenue by about $34,000 per annum.

4. Agent collection rate (Domestic Food Business Levy)

A change is proposed to clarify that the $11 collection charge for the Domestic Food Business Levy currently described in regulation is GST-exclusive. Charges in regulations are routinely recorded as GST-exclusive because businesses are generally the one charged and claim back GST (the price businesses are concerned about is the GST-exclusive price). This will also future-proof charges in case of future GST changes. This charge was intended to be GST-exclusive.

5. Animal products: charges for use of electronic system

The proposal is to amend the Animal Products (Dairy Industry Fees, Charges, and Levies) Regulations 2015 and Animal Products (Fees, Charges, and Levies) Regulations 2007, to enable certification costs to be recovered at the same level during 2025–26, as the certification system transitions from the AP e-cert system to the new trade certification system. The proposals include removing the “cost per second” component of the charging formula, and to amend the definition of “cost per request” as the cost per second component is not compatible with how the new system will operate.

6. Food Importer Levy

Three changes are proposed to the new Food Importer Levy. The changes improve efficiency around who pays, what data is used in the calculation of the levy, and the due date for levy payment. The changes reflect original intentions when the Food Importer Levy was approved last year, but which were not given effect at the time. The changes are as follows:

  • extend the levy to importers who are registered but who do not import any amount of food. Despite importing no food, these importers generate some cost by interacting with the food safety system
  • charge importers at the start of each financial year according to their import amounts from the previous year. This is expected to reduce administration costs for importers and MPI.

We also propose to standardise the date the levy is payable to within 20 working days of the date of the annual levy invoice.

Making a submission

We welcome submissions on the proposals contained in the consultation document. Submissions must be received by 5pm on 7 March 2025.

You can make a submission by completing a submission form and either:

  • sending it to us by email, or
  • posting it to us.

Cost recovery submission form [DOCX, 110 KB]

How to submit your completed form by email

Attach your completed form to an email and send it to costrecovery@mpi.govt.nz

How to submit your completed form by post

Post your completed submission form to:

Cost Recovery Directorate I Corporate Branch
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation