Category: LDR

Source: Radio New Zealand

Canterbury’s regional council says it is continuing to address coastal protection rules, but conservationists say it is not acting fast enough.

Environment Canterbury says a review of the Canterbury Regional Coastal Environment Plan is ongoing, despite the government’s halt on planning work.

But Forest & Bird and Greenpeace want action now to protect wildlife and biodiversity.

The plan was adopted in 2005 to promote the sustainable management of Canterbury’s coastline.

The New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement was subsequently introduced in 2010.

ECan councillor Genevieve Robinson has been advocating for the regional coastal plan to be updated for several years.

Her notice of motion two years ago led to councillors calling for aspects of the plan to be reviewed last year.

But the coastal environmental has been forced to take a back seat as the council faces pressures from reform and rates capping, Robinson said.

“We are still obligated to look after the coast and our Mana Whenua partners want us to look after the coast.

Forest & Bird Canterbury / West Coast regional conservation manager Nicky Snoyink said the council could not use the government’s planning pause as an excuse.

“Recent incidents including boat groundings, oil spills, and dolphin deaths are clear warning signs that Canterbury’s marine environment needs stronger planning, monitoring and enforcement, urgently.”

Greenpeace oceans campaigner Juan Parada said “a robust and fit for purpose” regional plan was urgently needed.

“We’ve seen how centralised control has prioritised private profit over ocean health.

“An updated plan would allow for precautionary management that reflects the care Canterbury residents have for their coast, ensuring we protect species like the Hector’s dolphin or hoiho (yellow-eye penguins).”

ECan acting regional planning manager Lisa Jenkins said the council is continuing to review coastal plan, which will feed into a Combined Regional Plan for Canterbury

She said the council’s 2024/34 Long Plan Plan had anticipated a plan change being notified later this year.

“While there are some limited exemption pathways through the ‘plan stop’, it is unlikely a coastal plan change would meet the criteria for an exemption, other than to manage a specific natural hazard.”

Under the proposed legislation, a Combined Regional Plan would need to be in place by 2029.

It will include a regional spatial chapter, natural environment and land use chapters, and will incorporate district and regional plan functions, Jenkins said.

The existing coastal plan applies to the entire coastal marine area from Kekerengu, north of Kaikōura, to Waitaki, and out to 12 nautical miles.

It also addresses sea level rise and climate change by directing development away from areas prone to erosion and coastal flooding.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

Gisborne is a step closer to taking control of regional waste, but some district councillors expressed “discomfort” over the process.

Councillors voted on a preferred site for developing the regional Refuse Transfer Station and Resource Recovery Centre at a council meeting on Thursday.

The 275 Lytton Road site was the recommended option in the council report and “the strongest” according to technical and financial assessments.

However, a mana whenua group, Te Kuri a Tuatai Marae, opposed the site, which was close to their marae.

Confirming the preferred site allows council staff to move into the next planning stages, involving a detailed concept design, cost refinement and a business case.

Māori ward councillor Nick Tupara said the council had not been “the best neighbour” to Rongowhakaata, Ngāi Tāwhiri and Te Whānau a Iwi for some time.

Te Kurī ā Tuatai Marae representatives expressed concerns about the site’s proximity and its visual impacts and prospects of noise, odour and increased traffic, potential effects on the Waikanae Awa, and the wider historical context of waste management in the area, according to the council’s meeting report.

There were ongoing legacy matters on environmental remediation, such as the former Paokahu landfill, which had “influenced perspectives”.

“A key message from marae representatives was: ‘Why address new waste infrastructure when historic waste impacts remain unresolved?'” the report reads.

Tupara voted against the report, along with Māori ward councillors Rhonda Tibble and Anne Huriwai, and general ward councillors Debbie Gregory and Samuel Gibson.

Gregory said the report was “bittersweet” to read. It was her “dream” to see the facility realised.

“I hate to delay anything as cool as this, but in my heart I can’t say yes at this point.”

Both Tibble and Gibson said they felt the “discomfort” in their “puku”.

Delaying the project would result in foregone savings estimated at $1.5 million to $3.2m per year, which would increase over time, the report reads.

“Previous analysis identified an estimated $8.7m capital cost advantage compared with a new Greenfield facility, with further modelling confirming ongoing system‑wide benefits from council ownership.”

Gisborne’s current supply chain for waste creates “market inefficiencies, increased costs, and poor sustainability incentives”, a presentation slide read.

Residents pay $527 per tonne of general waste disposal at the Gisborne Refuse Transfer Station, compared with the national average of $220-$430 p/t.

The cost to the region is estimated to be $12m per year and was forecast to be $16m per year by 2033.

Mayor Rehette Stoltz and Māori ward councillor Rawinia Parata “hesitantly” and “tentatively” supported the paper, and deputy mayor Aubrey Ria said it had caused her much “āmaimai” (anxiety).

Stoltz said she had seen the council go “above and beyond” the Treaty compass to make sure it was not a transitional relationship.

“If we decide today to move this forward, we will do better, and we will keep the door open to focus on improving that relationship.”

Parata said she was interested in the pathways of improving, beautifying and supporting the surrounding areas.

As part of the next phase of work, the council would prioritise a governance-led “best neighbour” approach, according to the council report.

This included environmental protection and enhancement beyond minimum compliance, and design and operational controls that would minimise noise, odour, litter, traffic and visual effects.

Ria said her vote of support did not “predetermine” her decision that the final confirmation of the site was “set in stone”.

She was “willing to take the risk of the further expense” and hoped for “some progression in [council’s] kōrero with hapū and marae”.

She asked whether the transfer station would also go out for consultation with the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan, which had been adopted for consultation at the meeting.

Chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann confirmed that the council would “use the same channels to get the information out at the same time”.

Councillor Larry Foster said he was “totally happy” to move the report, which councillor Alexander Boros seconded.

He was sure most of the community would support the decision.

“To have a facility that we can totally recycle and utilise our waste is absolutely awesome.”

Chief adviser of Māori partnerships Gene Takurua said he did not want to “challenge or disrespect” the position of marae, hapū and iwi, but did not think the council got to engage or discuss “the real kaupapa” and “opportunity at hand”.

This was because of the legacy issues that continued to impact the surrounding area, Rongowhakaata iwi and the hapū concerned.

Opportunity was provided for the marae and Rongowhakaata Iwi Trust to “sit as equal partners” and be recognised for time, effort and contribution.

“Hand on heart, I feel that we certainly aligned with our Treaty requirements and responsibilities in terms of our attempts.”

The council report states that further sites had been explored; these sites either could not support future growth, recycling and recovery initiatives, posed significantly higher operational costs, or were not suitable for the Regional Resource Centre.

The Lytton Road site was the only site within council ownership that could be progressed without significant delays, rework or additional land acquisition.

The site options were 75 Innes Street (status quo), 275 Lytton Road and a greenfields site in the vicinity of Gisborne City.

The recommended option voted on by councillors meant the council would continue to “actively invite mana whenua engagement, including opportunities to participate in design refinement, environmental enhancement, monitoring and ongoing dialogue”.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

It will be more expensive to travel on Wellington’s public transport later this year.

The Greater Wellington Regional Council voted on Thursday to hike Metlink’s base fare by 3.1 percent and slash the off-peak discount from 30 percent to 20 percent but the changes will start only after contactless payments using debit and credit cards are activated on the Snapper system.

Both dates are yet to be confirmed: Metlink officials said at Thursday’s council meeting contactless payments would start “mid to early April” and it would be up to six weeks afterwards when fares would change.

That means for a passenger commuting between suburbs such as Karori, Khandallah, Lyall Bay and the city centre, rush-hour fares are going up from $4.53 to $4.67, but off-peak fares rise from $3.17 to $3.74. Those paying contactless are charged an extra 1.5 percent card fee.

Papers from Thursday’s meeting estimated that as things stands, Metlink’s fare revenue this financial year would be about $3 million lower than budgeted, but officials said that number could still change.

It blamed a combination of factors: the number of train passengers continued to fall, while “socio-economic changes” like flexible work arrangements, slower economic recovery and unemployment contributed to an emerging decline in bus passenger numbers.

Councillors were divided on how much to increase the base fare and the timing of the rise, which was slated originally for July.

Council chairperson Daran Ponter’s amendment brought it forward by a few months to soften any financial difficulty.

“We could exhaust all of our transport reserves as a consequence of stuff that is happening on the network right now,” he said. “It means we’ve got no buffer in the next financial year when many of these things could still continue to play out.”

Ros Connelly, the chairperson of the regional council’s public transport committee, said the 3.1 percent increase was the limit between prudent economic management and what the public could afford. She also wanted any hikes to happen in July.

Councillor Adrienne Staples was in favour of a 4.1 percent base fare increase to take pressure off ratepayers. “While my personal preference in an ideal world would be to have free public transport across our whole region. It’s not where we work at the moment. We cannot afford to keep going out the back door.”

Last year, Metlink increased its fares by 2.2 percent and dropped the off-peak discount from 50 percent to 30 percent.

Thursday’s meeting papers also revealed this financial year’s fares and advertising income would likely make up less than the targeted 25.1 percent of Metlink’s total revenue, with the next year’s target set at 25.7 percent.

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) laid new expectations for all public transport providers in 2024 to have fares and advertising income make up a specific proportion of its revenue.

NZTA’s target for Metlink was once at 42 percent, a figure that regional councillors said it would need to hike fares by as much as 70 percent to hit.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

One of the Wellington region’s longest-serving politicians and best-known environmentalists has announced she will retire from politics later this year.

Green Party list MP and former Wellington mayor Celia Wade-Brown announced her retirement today, saying she would not be contesting the November election.

“Having served as a Green city councillor for fourteen years, two terms as mayor, and a Green Party list MP, I will continue to strongly support the Green Party,” she said.

“Serving as a member of Parliament for the Green Party has been a privilege. However, as one of the oldest MPs in this Parliament – and the oldest woman MP, I am looking forward to fewer midnight debates under anti-democratic urgency.”

She would continue her current Parliamentary role until the election, and support whoever the Green Party chose as its Wairarapa candidate.

“It has been a great experience being an MP based in Wairarapa and getting to know the area,” she said.

“I really love the Wairarapa. I will continue to enjoy the region, as we are staying here.”

She ha- been an MP since January 2024, served as Wellington mayor from 2010 until 2016, and was a Wellington councillor for 14 years before that.

She stood as a list MP in 1999 (the first MMP election), 2005, 2020 and 2023.

She would continue until the election as Green Party associate spokesperson on conservation (predator free), and its spokesperson on democracy and electoral reform, digitising government, and tourism and hospitality.

Her local government portfolio would pass to Mike Davidson, who ha- experience in local government, having served as a councillor in Ōtautahi Christchurch.

Green Party co-leaders Marama Davidson and Chlöe Swarbrick in a statement praised Wade-Brown’s contribution.

“Celia has given many decades to improving outcomes for Wellingtonians and te taiao as part of the Green Party. She is a champion for a sustainable living in local and central government. We respect Celia’s decision to step away from national politics at the end of this term. We expect she will continue to contribute to the Green Party, our shared values, and to bringing about a better world in whatever roles she chooses.”

Carterton-based Wade-Brown had been involved in local predator control and tourism initiatives like the Wairarapa walking festival.

While she had no current plans for her post-Parliament life, she was open to possibilities.

“I am standing down from politics, we will see what happens after November,” she said.

“If there are other opportunities that fit I could be interested.”

She expected her current Wairarapa predator control work would continue, as well as knowledge sharing around conservation issues, and involvement in the walking festival.

“Beyond the election, I will continue to protect native habitat in the Wairarapa against rats, stoats, deer, and possums.

“I’m also going to be doing pack-rafting, cycling, tramping and things that don’t fit easily into a Parliamentary schedule.

“And, most exciting, in 2025 I became a grandmother.”

She would have a full schedule in Parliament up until November.

“In 2026, I will continue to speak up for people, te tiriti, and nature.

“With support from back-benchers across most parties, I hope to progress my domestic cat microchipping members bill.”

Highlights of Wade-Brown’s Wellington local government career included helping turn the Capital into an award-winning centre for urban diversity.

She and her council helped introduce the Predator Free Wellington initiative, targeting rats, stoats and other predators. They also helped Zealandia become financially and environmentally sustainable, and enabled Wellington Zoo to become an environmental leader.

She had put cycling on Wellington’s agenda, with the city now considered Asia-Pacific’s third best for getting around by bike.

Under Wade-Brown the city was also the first to introduce a bylaw requiring cat registration, an initiative she hoped to help take nationwide.

She praised her colleagues.

“The talent within the Green Party staff, elected representatives in local and central government, branch members, and networks is immense.”

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

A small forest fire outside Masterton on Tuesday highlighted the increased risk of forest fires in the region.

Although the Bideford blaze was quickly extinguished, Wairarapa’s mostly dry summers and significant forestry industry have some worried.

However, the region’s biggest forestry firm said it was well prepared.

Fire and Emergency New Zealand community risk manager Phil Soal said many of the forest fires across Wairarapa this month had been started accidentally.

“Over the last month crews have attended a number of callouts after fires have reignited from old burn piles.”

Late last year, at a workshop on climate change organised for the Carterton, Masterton and South Wairarapa district councils, an attendee said he was concerned about possible forest fires.

“We sit out in the country. A lot of us have neighbouring forests – a lot of people are surrounded by forests.”

He said if there were a forest fire, it was possible that the water in farmers’ dams could be used.

“Fires generally occur in summer, so therefore that farmer – relying on the dam for stock water – is he going to say no and then be a party to probably letting the forest fire go and endanger lives?”

Soal agreed it was possible farm dams could be used in a fire emergency, but this was one of many possible water sources.

Fire and Emergency NZ crews would source water from “any sufficient open water supply”, he said.

“Depending on the location of the incident, firefighting water supplies will be taken from a number of places including lakes, rivers, water tankers, oceans and swimming pools. Water could also be taken from farmers’ dams.

“Initially, water supplies will come from our fire trucks and water tankers until a sufficient water supply is established.”

Juken ‘constantly reviewing’ fire dams

Sean McBride is the chief forest officer at Juken New Zealand (JNL), a forestry company that manages 15,000 hectares of forest plantations across Wairarapa.

He said the company had thousands of litres of its own water as well as other firefighting equipment.

Forest owners took their responsibility regarding wildfire risk very seriously, he said, and JNL has an emergency response plan that gets updated annually.

“JNL has installed a number of 1 million-plus litre, lined fire dams at strategic locations throughout our forest estate,” he said.

“These are accessible to both fire appliances and helicopters … We are constantly reviewing the coverage our fire dams give and will be considering new installations in an ongoing basis.

“JNL has invested significantly over our 35-year history in the Wairarapa and have two of our own fire appliances based at our fire station at Waingawa.

“We also have 6km of fire hose, 11 fire pumps, one slip-on unit, access to heavy machinery – bulldozers and excavators – and approximately 50 trained firefighters within our staff and contract workforce.

“JNL management staff are also trained to be able to participate in various roles in an incident management team at any forest fire event.”

He said more than 98 percent of wildfires occurred as a result of human activity.

“If we can implement best practice to reduce the risk of ignition then the impact of wildfire on rural communities is significantly reduced.”

JNL’s plan included forest maps with water source locations, emergency and resource contacts, and response plans scaled to the level of risk.

The plan included wildfire guidelines that complied with the New Zealand Forest Owners Association’s forest fire risk management advice.

Permits needed in restricted season

Soal said Wairarapa was currently in a restricted fire season and he encouraged people to be extra vigilant.

He said property owners needed a permit to light an open-air fire.

“Physically check any burn piles from the last few weeks are fully extinguished. If in doubt, put more water on it to make sure it’s fully extinguished ahead of these extreme conditions.”

People in doubt about smoke or a fire should always call 111.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

About 100 people crowded into the Whakatāne District Council chambers on Wednesday in a show of support for the restoration of Ōhope Beach’s iconic West End walkway.

A second meeting room with video and audio links to the chambers was opened to accommodate supporters of Austin Oliver and Angus Robson’s proposal to allow volunteers to restore the track.

Four years after the section of Ngā Tapuwae o Toi walkway between Otarawairere Bay and, West End, Ōhope, was closed by slips, the track around a steep, rocky point providing one of two access points to the secluded Otarawairere Bay remains closed.

Mr Oliver and Mr Robson told Local Democracy Reporting they had been in communication with the council for about a year with their proposal, which they estimated to cost about a tenth of the $451,000 the council has been allocated through the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Tourism Infrastructure Fund for the track’s repair.

“What we are getting is officers of the council saying volunteers can’t do it because of health and safety,” Mr Robson said.

They asked the council not to allow liability fears to be a handbrake to community projects.

“Angus and I have been blown away by the amount of support we have received from the community,” Mr Oliver said.

“We wish to work with the council to resolve this issue in a safe and practical manner.”

Mr Robson said the council’s concerns had set him off into a “major deep dive” into why community projects throughout New Zealand were being knocked back on health and safety grounds.

“What I have learnt is that if we follow health and safety protocols there’s no more risk to the council than if contractors did the work. We should be encouraged to do it because the rates saving is so huge and the community engagement is so positive.”

Rangitaiki ward councillor Gavin Dennis agreed community groups should be partnering with council to improve the district, but referenced the charges laid against helicopter pilot Mark Law by WorkSafe after he flew out to Whakaari during the 2019 eruption to rescue people on the island.

“I agree with you about what it says here in the law that you can’t eliminate all risks, but it wont stop WorkSafe going after you like a rabid dog, will it?”

Mr Robson had spoken at length to Worksafe and some of the country’s top health and safety lawyers over the past few weeks.

“I think everyone learnt something from the Whakaari [eruption], including WorkSafe.

“I doubt very much that you will ever see a shotgun approach like you saw there.”

Mr Robson said he had spoken to people from the Department of Conservation, which had managed to navigate the use of volunteers to maintain its tracks when it could no longer afford to carry out the work itself.

“So there’s no reason our council shouldn’t navigate it as well.”

He presented a petition yesterday signed by 500 people supporting their proposal.

“Not because we could only get 500 people, but because they were the first 500 people we approached. So far we have received almost 100 percent community support.”

Many of those people had ticked a box on the petition offering help with the project, whether it was through giving money, physically helping or providing expertise.

“We’ve got all the skills and all the money and all the will in the world.”

Mr Oliver acknowledged Ngāti Awa as tangata whenua and Ngāti Hokopu as mana whenua of the area during his presentation.

Māori ward councillor Toni Boynton also acknowledged the the area where the track is located, Kāpū te Rangi, as being of great significance to Māori as “the site of the ancient pa of Toi … one of the cradles of Māori civilisation”.

Mayor Nandor Tanczos said the council would make a decision in the new year when it had engineering reports and various associated reports presented to council.

“Those reports will then be released to the public.”

The council’s community experience general manager Alexandra Pickles said it had not ruled out involvement from volunteers in reinstating the walkway. However, the work involved complex landslip remediation in a high-risk area and the council had health and safety obligations to ensure any work was done properly and safely, regardless of whether it is carried out by contractors or volunteers.

“If volunteers wish to be considered as part of the solution, they will need to go through the standard procurement process alongside other options once the council determines its preferred reinstatement approach.”

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

A Wairarapa council’s climate-change adaptation programme is showing early signs of success.

From no-mow trials in public parks, to soft plastic recycling and addressing water processing issues, Carterton council is adopting sustainable practices across its business units.

The council’s policy and projects subcommittee was updated on the programme’s progress at its meeting on Wednesday.

“We are doing really well,” a spokesperson said.

“There is some great stuff happening. Things like the composting trials, waste-minimisation and progress on our district plan. There are good things in there from a climate perspective.”

A report presented to the committee described climate-adaptation successes in the council’s parks and reserves, water, waste, planning, community development and facilities.

“Climate change, natural hazard risk, and resilience are central themes woven throughout the proposed district plan,” the report said.

“The strategic direction chapter outlines the key matters to guide decision-making and introduces objectives that focus on: climate change mitigation, adapting to climate change, resilience to natural hazards, water resilience and renewable energy.”

A no-mow trial had started in selected parks from September.

This is a land management initiative where areas like parks, road verges, or reserves are left unmown for a time to study the benefits of reduced mowing.

The current trial is at Sparks Park, Carrington Park, Feist Street Reserve, Bird Reserve, Howard Booth Park, and South End Park.

“It’s not the entire park, it’s just a strip of the area – encouraging the wild flowers to grow,” a spokesperson said.

The first two climate community forums, on afforestation and freshwater happened in October and November, with more planned.

Soft plastic recycling was now available through a local supermarket, and community engagement had been encouraged through “plastic free July”, “clean-up” week in September, and similar projects.

The council had switched domestic rubbish bags to ones with higher recycled content, and provided support for Carterton’s community gardens, foodbank and composting initiatives.

“The Waignawa process water project (first stage) was opened in September providing low-cost, non-potable water to businesses within the Waingawa industrial area.

“This will reduce the use of chemicals and power by not using potable water for process water,” the report said.

The council’s climate change strategy – adopted in April – aimed to enhance knowledge and understanding and build a culture of change so that, as an organisation, the council would lead by example.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The government’s proposed rates cap could put future core infrastructure projects at risk, Marlborough mayor Nadine Taylor says.

The government has proposed capping rates rises at a target range of 2-4 percent a year across all general and targeted rates, excluding water charges and non-rates revenue such as fees and charges.

Local Government Minister Simon Watts said the proposal was “about stopping the runaway rate hikes” that had impacted families and those on fixed incomes.

Councils would have to start factoring the cap into their planning from 2027, with the full cap coming into effect in 2029.

Taylor said no-one, including her, wanted to see rates rises like those of recent years, with Marlborough’s increase this year at 8.61 percent.

“Those rates rises we’ve had have been very much outside of council’s control,” Taylor said

High rates rises had been largely tied to inflation, Taylor said.

“Local government inflation isn’t measured against things like butter or mince, things that households buy. It’s measured against steel and bitumen and the cost of building a bridge.

“Those costs have essentially just gone crazy in the last few years.”

Local government inflation was 3.3 percent this year, meaning almost all of a 4 percent rates cap would have been used to cover inflation, Taylor said.

Taylor said that while she understood why water charges were exempted from the rates cap, with $413m of infrastructure investment needed in the next 10 years, she didn’t understand why roading was not also exempt.

“Many councils across the country are looking at a bell wave of renewals in roading,” she said.

“A lot of those renewals are around quite expensive items like bridges … that roading is key infrastructure should be treated the same as water.”

Watts said he did not envisage a situation where councils would let the conditions of their roads deteriorate.

But Taylor said that without exemptions, councils would struggle to fund road renewals under the cap.

Under the proposed cap, councils would need to apply to a regulator to raise rates beyond the cap, which would only be granted under exceptional circumstances such as natural disasters.

The Marlborough Roads Recovery project repairing storm damage from previous years, now in its third and final stage, was partially funded by gradually increasing targeted rates until 2034. Under a rates cap, that funding would be at risk.

“We could be an early example of a council that needs to apply for an exemption,” Taylor said.

It was important the exemption process be flexible and fast-moving to support communities when responding to natural disasters or infrastructure needed for climate change resilience, Taylor said.

“The central government seems to like the term fast-track, so they’re going to need a fast-track process for exemptions in order to keep the country moving,” she said.

Marlborough would need significant climate resilience infrastructure in the future, including raising stopbanks along the Wairau River to protect towns from the increased risk of flooding, Taylor said.

“We don’t want to be having a conversation with our communities to say to them, ‘we can’t do this work, we can’t protect you, we can’t renew that bridge’.

“But if there is not enough flexibility built into this system of exemptions, then that’s a conversation that we might end up having over the next 10 and 20 years.”

While most infrastructure investment was funded through debt, council had to be cautious as to how much they allow debt to make up funding shortfalls, she said.

On Tuesday, credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s said that a rates cap could lead to a greater debt burden as council’s could be forced to rely more heavily on debt to finance capital expenditure.

Councils that responded to the rates cap by loading up on debt could see their credit ratings downgraded, making it more expensive to borrow.

Uncertainty around funding and exemptions meant councils could be reluctant to take on new projects, Taylor said.

“The one that springs to my mind immediately is the homeless, the issue that we’re seeing rising here in Marlborough.

“We will struggle to consider to take on any more obligations … where the community is very, very keen for us to take a lead, we just won’t be able to.”

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand