Source: UNICEF Aotearoa NZ
Energy Resources Aotearoa Welcomes New Industry-Led Work-based Learning Model
Source: Energy Resources Aotearoa
Govt vocational education reforms will cause massive disruption – CTU
Source: New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi (CTU)
The New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi is warning that the Government’s decision to adopt a new model for the vocational education and training sector will lead to massive disruptions and instability in an already fatigued sector.
“The NZCTU remains fundamentally opposed to these reforms, which will create further disruption across the sector and come off the back of a period of disruption and change in the sector over the past five years,” said NZCTU Acting President Rachel Mackintosh.
“We are concerned by the impacts that another several years of change processes will have on the sector, learners, and industries.
“Our major concern regarding the model that the Government is adopting is the risk of the creation of new private agencies competing for public funding within the sector; this model has not served New Zealand well in the past.
“Profit motives drive instability in education, and it is not a good use of resources to have multiple agencies competing for funding as they must focus attention on securing funding at the expense of focusing on delivery for learners.
“The whole process for these reforms has been flawed. There is no reason why the consultation needed to have such a narrow scope, excluding critical stakeholders, and key subject matter experts.
“The Minister’s insistence on pushing ahead with these poorly thought through reforms is likely to create several more years of instability in the sector, and more uncertainty for learners, industries, and the vocational education and training workforce,” said Mackintosh.
ANZAC Day – ‘Never Again’ Anzac Day Peace Picnic
Source: Peace Action Wellington
Friday 25 April 2025 – An Anzac Day Peace Picnic with the theme of ‘Never Again’ will be held at Pukeahu National War Memorial on Friday 25 April from 12:30pm-2pm. This is a family-friendly peace event operating under the tikanga of mana whenua, Te Kotahitanga o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o te Ika.
“’Never again’ means no genocide,” said Valerie Morse, member of Peace Action Wellington.
“‘Never again’ is a phrase or slogan which is associated with the lessons of the Holocaust and other genocides. The slogan was used by liberated prisoners at Buchenwald concentration camp to denounce fascism.”
“We are coming together to stand against war, against fascism and to demand that we meet the aspirations of our ancestors who survived World War 1 and World War 2 for global peace and freedom,” said Valerie Morse, member of Peace Action Wellington.
“Anzac Day is portrayed as a day where the country can reflect on the horrors of war, the costs in human lives and commit collectively to never again allowing genocidal mass murder. We have to ask, is that really happening?” said Morse.
“In 2025 the Western world is actively funding a campaign of complete annihilation against Palestinians. Two million men, women and children are daily being shot, bombed from above, burned alive, bulldozed with tanks and held hostage inside a giant concentration camp called Gaza. This is paid for and provided by the US. Meanwhile, across the West fascism and far right political parties are gaining power with campaigns of hatred, exclusion, war, austerity and visions of armageddon.”
“The NZ government has failed to provide any humanitarian path for Palestinian refugees fleeing the bloodbath. It has been silent about Israel’s crimes. What’s worse is the government is now aiming to spend billions on new weapons of war and committing to fighting alongside the fascist USA in its endless wars. The new Defence Capability Plan clearly aligns NZ to the US and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. This is incredibly dangerous for the peace and security of Aotearoa NZ and the wider Pacific,” said Morse.
The Anzac Day event is organised by Peace Action Wellington, Pōneke Anti-Fascist Coalition, VUW Socialists, Justice for Palestine, Students for Justice in Palestine, Falastin Tea Collective and Alternative Jewish Voices.
BusinessNZ – More detail needed on vocational education reforms
Source: BusinessNZ
Consumer NZ – Despite low confidence in government efforts, people want urgent action to lower grocery bills
Source: Consumer NZ
Consumer NZ calls for stronger regulation of supermarket pricing and promotional practices following its new survey on supermarkets.
Consumer’s NZ Grocery Survey, carried out in mid-April, reveals a strong public appetite for government action to improve access to affordable food. Many respondents called for clear and effective intervention by the government, while also expressing low confidence in its ability to deliver.
“New Zealanders are struggling to access quality food at affordable prices, and they’re not seeing meaningful change at the checkout,” says Consumer NZ chief executive Jon Duffy.
“We’re pleased the government has kicked off a request for information process to explore how new entrants could help increase competition and deliver better grocery prices for New Zealanders. But the urgency is real.”
The survey also revealed the growing impact of rising prices on households. Thirty percent of people have needed help over the past year to get food – for example, from foodbanks, friends, family or Work and Income – based on the survey results.
The cost of living remains the highest concern for New Zealanders across all age groups and has for three years according to its Sentiment Tracker.
Low confidence in government action
The nationally representative survey shows most New Zealanders don’t believe the government is doing enough to keep food affordable.
Two-thirds of people (66%) said they have low confidence in current government policies, while just 9% expressed high confidence in government action.
Distrust in supermarkets also rising
These results provide valuable insights into more recent trends in public trust in supermarkets and the government, as shown in Consumer NZ’s Sentiment Tracker.
Source: Consumer Sentiment Tracker
Shoppers also report limited or declining trust in supermarkets to price and promote products fairly — an issue that raises additional concerns about consumer protection.
“There’s increasing discomfort with how data is being used in loyalty schemes, and whether the deals offered actually benefit the consumer,” Duffy says.
Strong support for government regulation
When asked in the Grocery Survey what could be done to keep food accessible, hundreds of respondents said food is simply too expensive and urgent action is needed. Many supported stronger regulation and clearer rules to stop misleading promotions, not just more competition in the sector.
“Consumers want the government to take a harder line — not only in promoting competition, but also in actively regulating how prices are set and how promotions are run,” says Duffy.
Shoppers adapt to high costs
Consumers are increasingly turning to cost-saving strategies, such as shopping around and buying in bulk, to deal with rising food prices and growing pressure on household budgets.
More than half of respondents said they compare prices across supermarkets – most commonly through supermarket websites or apps, rather than in-store checks. This behaviour signals the need for unit pricing and easy price comparison across retailers.
Loyalty programme perceptions are mixed
Perceptions of supermarket loyalty programmes are divided. Nearly two in five consumers feel loyalty schemes offer little or no benefit, while around one in three see them as worthwhile.
“Consumers are rightly questioning the real value of loyalty programmes,” says Duffy.
“Our research found 84% of New Zealanders use loyalty cards, but the so-called ‘specials’ don’t always reflect the lowest prices available at the checkout.”
While the Commerce Commission has not recommended a full review of loyalty programmes, it has called on supermarkets to ensure transparency in how data is collected and used, and to clearly disclose the terms of these schemes.
Time for action
“We are hearing loud and clear that shoppers feel unsupported and are losing trust – not just in supermarkets, but in the laws and systems that are meant to protect them,” Duffy says.
“To restore confidence, we need tougher regulation and greater enforcement to tackle pricing practices and market power in New Zealand’s grocery sector.”
Consumer NZ continues to push for measures that ensure fairer pricing, improved transparency, and increased competition in the supermarket industry.
Note
Consumer NZ surveyed 1,005 New Zealanders aged 18 and over online, between 10 and 15 April 2025 for the NZ Grocery Survey. The sample was provided by Dynata and reflects national population profiles based on Stats NZ data.
The Consumer NZ Sentiment Tracker is a quarterly survey that explores the interests and concerns of New Zealanders. The nationally representative survey of 1,000 respondents is conducted every three months.
Use of Police dog in arrest of youths in Gisborne justified
Source:
9 December 2021
The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that Police were justified in using a Police dog to arrest two youths in Gisborne on 10 February 2021.
A car was stolen in Gisborne, and officers located it at the end of an isolated, dead-end road. When Police searched the car, they found gang related tagging on the interior.
A dog handler tracked through isolated rural land. The dog led him to a stop-bank, where he heard a gang greeting. He located two persons with his torch whom he did not recognise and issued a warning for them to stop. One individual continued to move away from him. The police dog was released to stop that person. Both offenders were arrested.
Following the arrest, it was found that both offenders were youths. They were taken into custody and processed before being returned to their families. Following their arrest, two officers were required to complete a report to the Commissioner as the offenders were youths. The Authority found that this was not completed in accordance with policy.
A complaint was laid from the mother of one of the youths about both the use of force, inappropriate language from the arresting officer, and the way her complaint was handled by Police. The Authority could not determine whether derogatory language had been used and did not believe Police had deliberately discouraged a complaint from being laid.
The Authority also found that the use of the dog was lawful and reasonable under the circumstances. Authority Chair, Judge Colin Doherty, says, “Although apprehension of the occupants of a stolen car by use of a Police dog will not be warranted on many occasions, we do believe that the officer here was informed in his decision and this apprehension was justified”.
Public Report
Use of force on a man in central North Island justified
Source:
7 December 2021
The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that a Police officer was justified in using force to defend himself when he was accosted as he arrested a man in central North Island.
The officer attended a house to arrest the man for breaching his electronic bail monitoring conditions.
When the officer made the arrest, another man present physically intervened. Fearing that he was about to be assaulted, the officer punched the second man and a scuffle broke out between the two. The second man then ran inside the house, locking the door behind him.
The officer aimed pepper spray at the second man through an open window, and then broke a glass panel on the door to gain entry, only to find the man had escaped through a back window.
The Authority is satisfied the officer was justified in using the force he did in self-defence and that the force was reasonable in the circumstances. We also found that the officer’s entry into the house was lawful.
Public Report
Decision to use force on man in central North Island justified (PDF 378 KB)
Arrest of man in Palmerston North not justified
Source:
30 November 2021
The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that the arrest of a man for disorderly behaviour in Palmerston was not justified, and the man should not have been given a formal warning. The Authority also found that the way in which the officers dealt with the incident was unprofessional.
At about 3 am on 26 September 2020, two officers drove past a man and his friend who were crossing a road intersection in Palmerston North. The men did not cross at a pedestrian crossing and were standing in the middle of the road. One of the officers told the men to get off the roadway and the men yelled abuse at the officers as they drove past them.
The officers turned their car around and stopped next to the men, who were now standing on the opposite footpath. Two nearby, independent witnesses saw the officers get out of their car and aggressively confront the men. One of the witnesses complained to the Authority.
The interaction escalated and an officer warned one of the men that he would be arrested for disorderly behaviour if he continued behaving in that way. The man continued the abuse and was arrested for disorderly behaviour. The man was later released on a formal warning for the offence.
The Authority does not think the man’s behaviour amounted to disorderly behaviour as, in the context of the situation, it did not risk upsetting the public order, nor did it risk provoking a violent response from the public.
A parallel Police investigation found that the attitude and manner in which the officers approached the situation was a significant factor in causing it to escalate. The investigation also found that the interaction could have been better managed by the officers.
Subsequent to the Authority’s investigation, Police accepted that the arrest of the man was not justified. Police have apologised to the man and removed the formal warning from their database.
Authority Chair, Judge Colin Doherty said, “On the evidence available to him, we do not think the officer had ‘good cause to suspect’ the man committed the offence of disorderly behaviour (under either section 3 or section 4 of the Summary Offences Act) … We believe the officers should have made relevant inquiries to satisfy themselves that the man’s behaviour upset the public order or was likely to provoke a violent reaction. They did not.”
Public Report (PDF 419 KB)
Justified search and charging decision in Whanganui
Source:
18 November 2021
The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that Police were justified in searching and charging a woman who had been arrested and taken into custody in Whanganui on 1 September 2020.
During processing, a female officer searched the woman in accordance with policy. Once in a cell, Police asked the woman to remove all her clothing and put on a tear-proof gown. This was reasonable as officers had concerns for the woman’s safety and wellbeing.
The woman placed the gown over her clothing. A male officer used a cutting tool to remove the straps of her undergarments so her clothing could be removed from underneath the gown. The Authority found that the officer did not breach policy when he cut the straps. However, his actions lacked sound judgement and were inappropriate.
The woman was later charged with committing an indecent act with intent to insult due to comments she made to one of the male officers and her alleged actions while in custody. The charge was later withdrawn by Police.
The Authority found the charging officer relied on information provided to him and made an error of judgement by not reviewing all the documentation before it went to Court. However, Authority Chair, Judge Colin Doherty, says, “I believe there was sufficient evidence for the officer to lay the charges based on the woman’s comments to an officer and her actions that were captured on CCTV footage”.
The Authority recommended to Police that the policy governing searching people should be amended to ensure gowning may only be carried out by a person of the same gender identity as the detainee, unless in extreme or urgent situations.
Public Report (PDF 460 KB)